Can barely surviving an attack scale you to anywhere?

[CatLover313]

As I was looking into durability threads, I saw a post and comment saying if you passed out, all bloodied, but still will live after taking a Multiversal attack, it’ll give you at least universal. While this is an extreme example, I can think of instances where a character passes out but survives against an attack (highly injured) from an attack calculated to be 2-3 tiers above their current ranking.

While the durability page says and most people also agree you won’t scale to the feat for barely surviving with massive injures or passing out, is there any discussions about downscaling to the tier or a certain numerical multiplication value below?

 

[AguilaR202]

tiers above Low 2-C don’t work like that, because the gaps are undefined, even if a character were only half as strong as a 2-C character he’d still be 2-C just below “baseline”

Likewise if a character has a clean feat of surviving something at a given tier and supposing it is not such an overwhelmingly disparate showing from his usual durability rating the character could be rated with the “At most” prefix

 

[CatLover313]

tiers above Low 2-C don’t work like that, because the gaps are undefined, even if a character were only half as strong as a 2-C character he’d still be 2-C just below “baseline”

Likewise if a character has a clean feat of surviving something at a given tier and supposing it is not such an overwhelmingly disparate showing from his usual durability rating the character could be rated with the “At most” prefix

How does At Most usually work? Rarely see it but say a situation happens above, so character A receives At Most 7-C. If character B is shown to be relative or vaguely stronger than A and can beat him low-high diff, do they just get At least 7-C?