• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Mcu Spider-Man H1C

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gördüğüm kadarıyla, bu durum aykırı değerler için belirlenen her bir noktayı ihlal ediyor:
1) Güçte büyük bir sıçrama mı yoksa düşüş mü var? Şehir yıkımı konusunda birçok başarısı olan bir karakterin bir dağı yok edebildiği gösterilirse, bu durum mutlaka bir istisna olarak değerlendirilemez; çünkü aralarındaki enerji değerlerindeki sıçramaya rağmen, seviyeler arasındaki sıçrama aşırı derecede büyük değildir. Karakterin çok az başarısı varsa, bu noktayı muhtemelen göz ardı edebiliriz.
If a character has a bit feat for a higher level, it wouldn't already have a building level and would scale to a higher level.
2) Bu benzersiz veya istisnai bir olay mı? Benzer düzeydeki olaylar zaman içinde tutarlı bir şekilde tekrarlanıyorsa, bunların aykırı olma olasılığı düşüktür. Genellikle üçüncü olaydan itibaren. Karakterin çok az başarısı varsa, bu noktayı da atlayabiliriz.
This is entirely a method of denial; a character doesn't have to constantly demonstrate success, it can be scaled with just one scene.
3) Olay açıklanamaz ve gerekçesiz mi? Aşırı bir olay, onu haklı çıkaracak herhangi bir açıklama ile birlikte gelmiyorsa, muhtemelen istisnai bir durumdur. Ancak bir güç artışı, zayıflık veya sınırlayıcı mekanizma ile açıklanabiliyorsa, muhtemelen istisnai bir durum değildir. Süpermen bir kurşunla yaralanırsa, muhtemelen istisnai bir durumdur. Ancak Süpermen kırmızı güneş ışığının etkisi altındaysa veya daha önce Kriptonit ile zayıflatılmışsa, istisnai bir durum değildir.
Prove that this is an exceptional case.
4) Bu olay, önceden belirlenmiş güç sıralamasını bozuyor mu? Burada, benzer karakterlerin varsayımsal aykırı değerle benzer seviyede yeteneklere veya ifadelere sahip olması, aykırı değerin benzer bir seviyeyi gösterebilecek dövüşlerle desteklenmemesi veya onu bir şekilde çelişen sonraki olaylar veya ifadeler gibi bir dizi faktörü dikkate almalıyız.
When was Spider-Man ever defeated by someone of a lower level? And if someone defeats Spider-Man, Spider-Man doesn't fall; the person who defeats Spider-Man becomes H1C.
5) Olay, eserin anlatısıyla çelişiyor mu? Birçok kez, aykırı bir olay, bir eserde daha önce ortaya konan veya gösterilenlerle çelişerek, iki olaydan birini geçersiz kılmadığımız sürece çözülmesi zor tutarsızlıklar yaratır. Örneğin, bir karakter daha önce açıkça mermilerden kaçtığı görülmüş olmasına rağmen, mermilerden kaçamadığını iddia ediyorsa, muhtemelen daha güvenilir kanıtı kullanmak zorunda kalacağımız bir çelişkiyle karşı karşıyayız.
Prove that there is a contradiction.
 
The entirety of Far From Home, No Way Home, and Brand New Day. There's my outliers. Every time Peter does anything or gets hurt by being thrown into a wall or something.
In this case, Peter doesn't experience a fall; whatever is harming Peter becomes H1C.
 
9pmrim.jpg


So why exactly are we arguing that Spiderman is relative to the Infinity stones via resisting the "effects(hax)" of the snap, furthermore why are we saying that Spiderman was able to resist it when he very clearly didn't and his resistance was nothing more than a dramatic moment, it's your burden to prove otherwise and a hefty one at that. That aside if Spiderman is indeed H1-C that makes a ton of people H1-C which roughly puts them in the same park as Infinity Ultron and said people got damaged by meteorites and other conventional weaponry.
 
Bu konuyu ciddiye almak istememiştim ama görünüşe göre bu gerçek bir teklifmiş, bu yüzden tüm yanlış noktaları burada paylaşacağım:
  • Dormammu'nun 11 boyutlu olması, onu Yüksek 1C yapmaz. Yüksek 1C seviyesine ulaşmak için önemli büyüklükte 11 boyutlu bir evreni yok etmeniz gerekir.
11-dimensional characters or objects will be considered H1C.
  • Sonsuzluk Taşlarının Dormammu'yu durdurabilmesinin saldırı güçleriyle hiçbir ilgisi yok; çoğunun fiziksel saldırılarla alakası olmayan, olağanüstü yetenekleri var.
The time stone is already affecting Dormammu; I've proven it.
  • Peter'ın hayatta kalmasının tek sebebi dramatik etki yaratmaktı. Eğer gerçekten direnseydi, bu sadece yıkıma karşı bir direniş olurdu ve AP ile hiçbir ilgisi olmazdı. Ayrıca onu öldüren bir şeye göre ölçeklendirmek de mantıklı değil. (Ayrıca ölçeklendirme zinciri de mantıklı olmazdı, sanırım Infinity War'dan sonra ortaya çıkan her Örümcek Adam düşmanı Yüksek 1-C seviyesinde.)
Prove that this is nothing but drama.
  • Tüm bunların yanı sıra, bunun son derece saçma bir istisna olacağı gerçeği de var.
only denial and rebellion
Filmlerde gerçekten 1-C seviyesinde olduğuna ve öyle gösterildiğine mi inanıyorsunuz, yoksa sadece en sevdiğiniz karakterlerden biri olduğu için profilinde 1. seviye olarak listelenmesini mi istiyorsunuz?
 
High 1-C wall
This is valid in marvel
 
So 20 m falls are now High 1-C? Walls now have High 1-C dura? High 1-C ordinary folk?

703503764_18113193700886077_2279273649120528579_n.heic
This is accepted at Marvel.
 
A regular train is 11D?
Son😭
Yeah
 
9pmrim.jpg


So why exactly are we arguing that Spiderman is relative to the Infinity stones via resisting the "effects(hax)" of the snap, furthermore why are we saying that Spiderman was able to resist it when he very clearly didn't and his resistance was nothing more than a dramatic moment, it's your burden to prove otherwise and a hefty one at that. That aside if Spiderman is indeed H1-C that makes a ton of people H1-C which roughly puts them in the same park as Infinity Ultron and said people got damaged by meteorites and other conventional weaponry.
Saying "it was for drama" doesn't refute the argument; prove it.
 
11-dimensional characters or objects will be considered H1C.
Will be according to who? If you think that they should be then make a staff thread because as far as our policies are concerned that's not how tier 1 works.
The time stone is already affecting Dormammu; I've proven it.
Again, that's hax, aka an ability that has nothing to do with attack potency or with attacking others physically and damaging them.
Prove that this is nothing but drama.
Doesn't change the fact that this has nothing to do with attack potency and that you're trying to scale someone to something that killed him. I guess if a character gets hit by an attack and dies from it at the hospital they scale to that attack because they didn't die instantly.
only denial and rebellion
sure.
 
Will be according to who? If you think that they should be then make a staff thread because as far as our policies are concerned that's not how tier 1 works.
vsbw agrees with what I'm saying, you're currently contradicting the site.
Again, that's hax, aka an ability that has nothing to do with attack potency or with attacking others physically and damaging them.
Thanks to this ability, they can gain AP, ultimately affecting an entity that is 11D.
Doesn't change the fact that this has nothing to do with attack potency and that you're trying to scale someone to something that killed him. I guess if a character gets hit by an attack and dies from it at the hospital they scale to that attack because they didn't die instantly.
Spider-Man, who briefly withstands the power of the Infinity Stones, becomes equally powerful.
 
I want to point out that the 11d statement comes from Ryan Meinerding, who is just the concept artist and character designer for the MCU , so the statement is probably not even reliable
Statements made by someone who owns the copyright will be considered third-degree canon, and third-degree canons will be valid unless there is a contradiction.
 
Saying "it was for drama" doesn't refute the argument; prove it
The Burden is on you to prove the validity of the "resistance" attributed to this specific scene which can be dismissed under the context of mere dramatic effect. It's your positive burden to show your position holds any merit whatsoever given the context and the narrative I don't have to prove anything because by all means I can dismiss the entire "resistance" argument by saying it's a darama.
 
The Burden is on you to prove the validity of the "resistance" attributed to this specific scene which can be dismissed under the context of mere dramatic effect. It's your positive burden to show your position holds any merit whatsoever given the context and the narrative I don't have to prove anything because by all means I can dismiss the entire "resistance" argument by saying it's a darama.
I've already proven that Spider-Man relies on the power of the stones, but you're saying it's just drama and offering no proof; that's a subjective opinion and not a refutation.
 
Even if we assume the entire argument is "okay" wouldn't Spider-Man still just get disintegrated anyway? I mean, it's like having your head smashed in, but it still scales to that attack lmao
I'm not saying Spider-Man is superior to the Infinity Stones, but the fact that he could withstand their power for a short time makes Spider-Man comparable to them.
 
Ah there it is. And here's Antvasima, the Head Bureaucrat, calling it a disaster in the making. MCU does not scale to comics. Find another scapegoat.
 
I've already proven that Spider-Man relies on the power of the stones,
????
Your translator is botched my guy. Nowhere have you proven that spiderman resisted the power of the stones because the feat you are using to assert the validity of your statement is what's under question you can't use the very feat under question as a valid proof or evidence.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top