• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Acheron does NOT have acausality type 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
You guys arguing Past erasing, past not existing. May I ask how this is Ac2? If thats valid(Considering i didnt read arguments fully) it would be Ac1 rather than Ac2
The world she is from was erased from time. From reality. History. The timeline. She doesn't have a past. This would normally be Ac 1 but Elio who sees the future and its infinite outcomes cannot see her in it. She doesn't exist in it. This gives her Ac 2.
btw just to clarify, changes to the past not affecting the future is already accepted as MWI in the verse so this wouldnt even grant aca type 1
Nothing mentioned in that page, which is OUTDATED, matters here.
my summary is here none of this has been refuted
Everything has been refuted lol
 
The world she is from was erased from time. She no longer has a past. This would normally be Ac 1 but Elio who sees the future and its infinite outcomes cannot see her in it. She doesn't exist in it. This gives her Ac 2.
already addressed
Nothing mentioned in that page, which is OUTDATED, matters here.
ok lets delete all of hi3.. oh wait that also removes 11D so aeons would go down to 4D HDE.. yea sure... it also removes extradimensional range...
Everything has been refuted lol
with reused scans that were refuted 2 pages ago
 
already addressed

ok lets delete all of hi3.. oh wait that also removes 11D so aeons would go down to 4D HDE.. yea sure... it also removes extradimensional range...

with reused scans that were refuted 2 pages ago
Again, saying "Nuhuh this didn't happen because I said so" doesn't mean refuting.
 
my last comment to support the idea she has a past and future.

Her path leads her to a new tomorrow this wouldnt be possible if nihility deletes your past and future. Nihility deleting your past and future is also contradicted by zephyro being predicted by elio in another future, zephyro being a self annihilator of nihility, something we currently accept on the wiki. This point is also tackled in the OP with no real contention.

Acheron treads trails of the past and even remembers her past proving her past still exists.

Some might say this is acausality type 2 but that would be ignoring the context of the statement. She is not talking about her being having no past present or future, rather her reason for drawing her blade remains the same regardless of the point in time.

Speaking of her blade, everytime she uses it the memories of using it, from the point of it's origin, return to her. This proves that nihility didnt destroy her past but rather obscured them (as ive been arguing)

Others also remember acheron's deeds, which is something acheron herself even says will happen, proving that she is temporally present in the past. others remembering things she has done shouldnt be possible if her past is supposedly deleted by the nihility. The entire plot of 3.8 happens within our memories and acheron is present there which shouldnt be possible if Nihility supposedly deletes her past as the opposition has been saying. Not to mention that if Nihility deletes her past none of these scenes should have happened or be remembered by other characters, yet they are. Maybe because her past still exists and is just obscured by nihility. Last but not least, we're able to have a false memories with acheron in them the plot of 3.8 is recalling our true memories that were sealed away by the dahlia, everything from this part to sunday's loss is in lore a fake memory created by the dahlia to hide the truth so we wont die in amphoreus. How can we have fake memories of someone who is supposedly deleted at that point in time? How can someone create fake memories of someone who doesnt exist in the past or future?

also just to point out, but erasing history isnt proof of acausality type 2, thats just existence erasure. for acausality type 2 you need proof she isn't temporally present in the future or past, which there hasnt been any proof of in this thread from the opposition





These, and the OP, should be evidence enough she still has a past even after becoming an emanator. there is no proof that she became acasual after becoming an emanator until i see scans proving that its pure headcanon. everything else is addressed in the OP

i will now wait for staff
bumping
 
Whatever. I'll make a final tl;dr (almost) writeup and just end it here unless a mod replies.

Nihility's power has long been accepted to be the opposite of existence. Capable of erasing things from reality as if they've never existed. It erases cause and effect and fate. These scans are on IX's profile and they come from Acheron's power as both of them wield Nihility. Since Acheron can do those things, it's expected that IX (her source of power) can too.

Acheron's homeland was struck and affected by IX's Shadow and she eventually obliterated it with a single slash mentioned here as well. This slash erased it from the memories of the world as if it never existed. Following this, Acheron was annihilated herself and sank into Nihility and started being erased. Acheron's past is gone in the sense that within the timeline, Izumo was erased from ever existing. This means that the causal chain between her origin and her existence has severed. Hence why it's been said that she "isn't supposed to exist".

The people who went to explore what happened to it found ONLY traces of Enigmata after its destruction hiding its history.

What OP is saying here
Another thing that disproves this is the history of Izumo, which is Acheron's home world. The relic set thoroughly describes Izumo's history before it was destroyed meaning they have records of this place but they are confused on why it suddenly disappeared. The only one who knows what happened to it is IX THEMSELVES since THEY were the one who destroyed it however IX doesnt speak so no one will ever find out. Other statements of Acheron not having a past are just characters saying "she's hiding something" so its pretty unlikely her past just straight up doesnt exist.
is a misreading of the relic's description. The description is given to us by an omniscient narrator. Not an in-game character. Nobody else in-universe is aware of this history. There's no traces left of it hence why people wonder what actually happened to it and even question its existence. IX technically knows what happened to it because they, passively, destroyed it. IX however being an apathetic, uninteractive and stagnant Aeon who doesn't communicate with anyone, won't spit the answer out. Because it's sleeping. Not because it has a hidden agenda. It doesn't think. This belongs to Enigmata which is why they hid and manipulated all information surrounding Izumo.
1. Acheron doesnt show up in elio's script.

Acheron asked S.A.M if she was in the script elio gave her and S.A.M says she didnt see anything about Acheron in the script. This would be a good case seeing that Elio can see infinite possibilities, even possibilities of Aeons. The problem here is that Elio never gives the full script as it would completely mess up his plan, So it’s far more likely that he simply didn’t give S.A.M. the full script, rather than Acheron somehow not appearing in it.
Acheron, because she is a temporal paradox, has no future. Elio who supposedly sees all timelines and possibilities has no trace of her anywhere.

The claim that the Hunters are not given their full scripts is not accurate. The scene is crucial piece of information about Acheron's existence and nature. There's no evidence that Firefly didn't have the full script at the time as we know that there's times when scripts are given to the Hunters with even the last of the details being in them. Claiming that FF didn't have the full script at that moment is speculative and frankly goes against the narrative of the scene whose point is to slowly reveal that Acheron is a self-annihilator. It's a pivotal point of the Penacony Arc. The question is very specific. She's asking about her future and Firefly answers her that she doesn't have one.

Acheron still remembers the old history exactly as it was, even though that version of it no longer exists anymore. Her own past stays intact in her memory and identity, while the world around her has moved onto a different history. So she ends up existing as proof of a reality that technically no longer exists. That's the basis of Acausality.

The point is that the world/history she originated from was consumed by Nihility when she became an Emanator destroying the causal continuity of her existence. Other people remembering Acheron’s actions does not disprove this in any case. Why would Acheron not be capable of interacting with the present timeline and leave observable effects? Nobody argued she became nonexistent or incapable of causally interacting with reality.

The entire point is that she survives after the destruction/consumption of the history and future connected to her world. She carries memories and continuity from something swallowed by Nihility.

The 3.8 memory segments happen after Acheron already became an Emanator and after the events involving Izumo/Takamagahara were consumed by Nihility. So using scenes from 3.8 to “prove her past still exists normally” makes no sense because those scenes are taking place after all of that already happened.

Only her origin point is gone, not her ongoing existence. The past that produced her was erased, but the “now” continues with her still inside it.

As for Passive Prob Manip, I am neutral as she doesn't have a predetermined future like other Pathstriders.

Lastly, nuking her Acausality 2 would affect IX's powers too since a lot of them are infered from how the obliteration of Izumo and herself erased the past and the future. And we are just not doing that for a number of reasons.
 
Last edited:
my last comment to support the idea she has a past and future.

Her path leads her to a new tomorrow this wouldnt be possible if nihility deletes your past and future. Nihility deleting your past and future is also contradicted by zephyro being predicted by elio in another future, zephyro being a self annihilator of nihility, something we currently accept on the wiki. This point is also tackled in the OP with no real contention.

Acheron treads trails of the past and even remembers her past proving her past still exists.

Some might say this is acausality type 2 but that would be ignoring the context of the statement. She is not talking about her being having no past present or future, rather her reason for drawing her blade remains the same regardless of the point in time.

Speaking of her blade, everytime she uses it the memories of using it, from the point of it's origin, return to her. This proves that nihility didnt destroy her past but rather obscured them (as ive been arguing)

Others also remember acheron's deeds, which is something acheron herself even says will happen, proving that she is temporally present in the past. others remembering things she has done shouldnt be possible if her past is supposedly deleted by the nihility. The entire plot of 3.8 happens within our memories and acheron is present there which shouldnt be possible if Nihility supposedly deletes her past as the opposition has been saying. Not to mention that if Nihility deletes her past none of these scenes should have happened or be remembered by other characters, yet they are. Maybe because her past still exists and is just obscured by nihility. Last but not least, we're able to have a false memories with acheron in them the plot of 3.8 is recalling our true memories that were sealed away by the dahlia, everything from this part to sunday's loss is in lore a fake memory created by the dahlia to hide the truth so we wont die in amphoreus. How can we have fake memories of someone who is supposedly deleted at that point in time? How can someone create fake memories of someone who doesnt exist in the past or future?

also just to point out, but erasing history isnt proof of acausality type 2, thats just existence erasure. for acausality type 2 you need proof she isn't temporally present in the future or past, which there hasnt been any proof of in this thread from the opposition





These, and the OP, should be evidence enough she still has a past even after becoming an emanator. there is no proof that she became acasual after becoming an emanator until i see scans proving that its pure headcanon. everything else is addressed in the OP

i will now wait for staff
bumping so the responses are beside eachother i guess i should also preface that this thread isnt removing passive probability manip, the only reason it is brought up is because it contradicts Aca type 2
 
The claim that the Hunters are not given their full scripts is not accurate. The scene is crucial piece of information about Acheron's existence and nature. There's no evidence that Firefly didn't have the full script at the time as we know that there's times when scripts are given to the Hunters with even the last of the details being in them. Claiming that FF
the scan for "them" doesnt work
 
Sorry Mbpoops but I'm definitely not reading allat 🙏

What's the summary?
bumping so the responses are beside eachother i guess i should also preface that this thread isnt removing passive probability manip, the only reason it is brought up is because it contradicts Aca type 2
i replied to it in this message, nighting's response is right above it
 
In case if any staff or people skim through thread and dont want to read whole arguments, I didnt read arguments from both sides and will get to thread when i get free tmrw or later

Summary
my last comment to support the idea she has a past and future.

Her path leads her to a new tomorrow this wouldnt be possible if nihility deletes your past and future. Nihility deleting your past and future is also contradicted by zephyro being predicted by elio in another future, zephyro being a self annihilator of nihility, something we currently accept on the wiki. This point is also tackled in the OP with no real contention.

Acheron treads trails of the past and even remembers her past proving her past still exists.

Some might say this is acausality type 2 but that would be ignoring the context of the statement. She is not talking about her being having no past present or future, rather her reason for drawing her blade remains the same regardless of the point in time.

Speaking of her blade, everytime she uses it the memories of using it, from the point of it's origin, return to her. This proves that nihility didnt destroy her past but rather obscured them (as ive been arguing)

Others also remember acheron's deeds, which is something acheron herself even says will happen, proving that she is temporally present in the past. others remembering things she has done shouldnt be possible if her past is supposedly deleted by the nihility. The entire plot of 3.8 happens within our memories and acheron is present there which shouldnt be possible if Nihility supposedly deletes her past as the opposition has been saying. Not to mention that if Nihility deletes her past none of these scenes should have happened or be remembered by other characters, yet they are. Maybe because her past still exists and is just obscured by nihility. Last but not least, we're able to have a false memories with acheron in them the plot of 3.8 is recalling our true memories that were sealed away by the dahlia, everything from this part to sunday's loss is in lore a fake memory created by the dahlia to hide the truth so we wont die in amphoreus. How can we have fake memories of someone who is supposedly deleted at that point in time? How can someone create fake memories of someone who doesnt exist in the past or future?

also just to point out, but erasing history isnt proof of acausality type 2, thats just existence erasure. for acausality type 2 you need proof she isn't temporally present in the future or past, which there hasnt been any proof of in this thread from the opposition

Type 2: Temporal Singularity: Characters with this type of Acausality do not exist in either the past or the future, only the present. This means they cannot be affected by changes to the past, while also making them resistant to Precognition that works by viewing the future, as they do not exist within it, and Fate Manipulation, for the same reason. In essence, they are able to choose their own fates, but they remain just as vulnerable at the point in time in which they do exist.

Existence Erasure is the simple power to remove something from existence, leaving nothing behind, a level of destruction beyond incineration, vaporization, and atomization. Rather than just reducing something to its constituent parts, this ability leaves absolutely nothing behind. Powerful enough uses of this ability can even erase the mind and soul, if not more fundamental aspects of one's existence, such as concepts.

These, and the OP, should be evidence enough she still has a past even after becoming an emanator. there is no proof that she became acasual after becoming an emanator until i see scans proving that its pure headcanon. everything else is addressed in the OP

i will now wait for staff
Whatever. I'll make a final tl;dr (almost) writeup and just end it here unless a mod replies.

Nihility's power has long been accepted to be the opposite of existence. Capable of erasing things from reality as if they've never existed. It erases cause and effect and fate. These scans are on IX's profile and they come from Acheron's power as both of them wield Nihility. Since Acheron can do those things, it's expected that IX (her source of power) can too.

Acheron's homeland was struck and affected by IX's Shadow and she eventually obliterated it with a single slash mentioned here as well. This slash erased it from the memories of the world as if it never existed. Following this, Acheron was annihilated herself and sank into Nihility and started being erased. Acheron's past is gone in the sense that within the timeline, Izumo was erased from ever existing. This means that the causal chain between her origin and her existence has severed. Hence why it's been said that she "isn't supposed to exist".

The people who went to explore what happened to it found ONLY traces of Enigmata after its destruction hiding its history.

What OP is saying here
Another thing that disproves this is the history of Izumo, which is Acheron's home world. The relic set thoroughly describes Izumo's history before it was destroyed meaning they have records of this place but they are confused on why it suddenly disappeared. The only one who knows what happened to it is IX THEMSELVES since THEY were the one who destroyed it however IX doesnt speak so no one will ever find out. Other statements of Acheron not having a past are just characters saying "she's hiding something" so its pretty unlikely her past just straight up doesnt exist.
is a misreading of the relic's description. The description is given to us by an omniscient narrator. Not an in-game character. Nobody else in-universe is aware of this history. There's no traces left of it hence why people wonder what actually happened to it and even question its existence. IX technically knows what happened to it because they, passively, destroyed it. IX however being an apathetic, uninteractive and stagnant Aeon who doesn't communicate with anyone, won't spit the answer out. Because it's sleeping. Not because it has a hidden agenda. It doesn't think. This belongs to Enigmata which is why they hid and manipulated all information surrounding Izumo.
1. Acheron doesnt show up in elio's script.

Acheron asked S.A.M if she was in the script elio gave her and S.A.M says she didnt see anything about Acheron in the script. This would be a good case seeing that Elio can see infinite possibilities, even possibilities of Aeons. The problem here is that Elio never gives the full script as it would completely mess up his plan, So it’s far more likely that he simply didn’t give S.A.M. the full script, rather than Acheron somehow not appearing in it.
Acheron, because she is a temporal paradox, has no future. Elio who supposedly sees all timelines and possibilities has no trace of her anywhere.

The claim that the Hunters are not given their full scripts is not accurate. The scene is crucial piece of information about Acheron's existence and nature. There's no evidence that Firefly didn't have the full script at the time as we know that there's times when scripts are given to the Hunters with even the last of the details being in them. Claiming that FF didn't have the full script at that moment is speculative and frankly goes against the narrative of the scene whose point is to slowly reveal that Acheron is a self-annihilator. It's a pivotal point of the Penacony Arc. The question is very specific. She's asking about her future and Firefly answers her that she doesn't have one.

Acheron still remembers the old history exactly as it was, even though that version of it no longer exists anymore. Her own past stays intact in her memory and identity, while the world around her has moved onto a different history. So she ends up existing as proof of a reality that technically no longer exists. That's the basis of Acausality.

The point is that the world/history she originated from was consumed by Nihility when she became an Emanator destroying the causal continuity of her existence. Other people remembering Acheron’s actions does not disprove this in any case. Why would Acheron not be capable of interacting with the present timeline and leave observable effects? Nobody argued she became nonexistent or incapable of causally interacting with reality.

The entire point is that she survives after the destruction/consumption of the history and future connected to her world. She carries memories and continuity from something swallowed by Nihility.

The 3.8 memory segments happen after Acheron already became an Emanator and after the events involving Izumo/Takamagahara were consumed by Nihility. So using scenes from 3.8 to “prove her past still exists normally” makes no sense because those scenes are taking place after all of that already happened.

Only her origin point is gone, not her ongoing existence. The past that produced her was erased, but the “now” continues with her still inside it.

As for Passive Prob Manip, I am neutral as she doesn't have a predetermined future like other Pathstriders.

Lastly, nuking her Acausality 2 would affect IX's powers too since a lot of them are infered from how the obliteration of Izumo and herself erased the past and the future. And we are just not doing that for a number of reasons.
 
I can't comment on timeline stuff since I don't know the verse.

So I'll have to rely on the actual supporters of the verse, which would be easier if the OP @Mbpoops updated whose in agreement and disagreement.

My vote might change off of that.
 
Agreeing with OP, since it seems pretty clear she has a past that is treated as existent.
Please, re-read this part.
Nihility's power has long been accepted to be the opposite of existence. Capable of erasing things from reality as if they've never existed. It erases cause and effect and fate. These scans are on IX's profile and they come from Acheron's power as both of them wield Nihility. Since Acheron can do those things, it's expected that IX (her source of power) can too.

Acheron's homeland was struck and affected by IX's Shadow and she eventually obliterated it with a single slash mentioned here as well. This slash erased it from the memories of the world as if it never existed. Following this, Acheron was annihilated herself and sank into Nihility and started being erased. Acheron's past is gone in the sense that within the timeline, Izumo was erased from ever existing. This means that the causal chain between her origin and her existence has severed. Hence why it's been said that she "isn't supposed to exist".
Even OP agrees that her past and her planet have been affected by IX. He just reads it as it having been "destroyed and concealed" whereas it's currently accepted that is was erased from the timeline.
 
Please, re-read this part.

Even OP agrees that her past and her planet have been affected by IX. He just reads it as it having been "destroyed and concealed" whereas it's currently accepted that is was erased from the timeline.
None of this really helps me.

Since I don’t know the verse, I can’t judge who’s right or wrong here. One side can show me scans saying her past was erased, another can show scans saying it was concealed, someone else can show scans about history erasure, and then another person can show a scan where her history is still referenced.

I don’t know the context or the timeline of events within this verse, so I can only go by what the supporters of the verse agree or disagree with.

So my vote depends on whether the majority of supporters agree or disagree with OP.
 
None of this really helps me.

Since I don’t know the verse, I can’t judge who’s right or wrong here. One side can show me scans saying her past was erased, another can show scans saying it was concealed, someone else can show scans about history erasure, and then another person can show a scan where her history is still referenced.

I don’t know the context or the timeline of events within this verse, so I can only go by what the supporters of the verse agree or disagree with.

So my vote depends on whether the majority of supporters agree or disagree with OP.
Agree: @Mr._East_Statement @Zanesucksatlife

Disagree: @Voidnether @Nighting4l33yes @CastoriceTheFifth

Neutral: @Natsuki012 @PedjaTarzan @Eseseso @Jackof_noTrades068
 
Last edited:
Anyhow I’m pretty sure the “isn’t supposed to exist” part is referring to how Nihility isn’t supposed to have Emanators since IX doesn’t glance at anyone. I don’t recall it having to do with some temporal anomaly
Or it's about her not having a traceable origin. There's other Emanators of Nihility as described here (meaning there's others) and here. Some Self-Annihilators are Emanators. And please, read the HSR Wiki's justification on that part. It's been mistranslated and the original text does call them Emanators. And let's not go down the route we did with the Generals again...

Also, I said it again but I'll repeat it.

The reason Acheron and IX both have this in their profiles:
"Passive Void Manipulation, Existence Erasure (Space-Time, History, Memory, InformationType 2】& ConceptualType 3】) & Causality Manipulation"
Is because of Acheron destroying Izumo. If we don't consider her past erased from space-time, history, memory, information and so on, they naturally lose it as half the justifications will be gone since they are also used for her Acausality making this a far bigger CRT.
 
Btw yall are basicslly arguing that goku black should have acausality type 2 because beerus erased his past self. He has no past woulf that mean hes aca type 2? No. Because thats not how aca type 2 works
 
Btw yall are basicslly arguing that goku black should have acausality type 2 because beerus erased his past self. He has no past woulf that mean hes aca type 2? No. Because thats not how aca type 2 works
Well from his profile he has Aca type 4. If you want to make her type 2 into a 4, that's another thread and point entirely. Her Aca 2 comes from her immunity to Elio's scripts and precognition.
 
Btw yall are basicslly arguing that goku black should have acausality type 2 because beerus erased his past self. He has no past woulf that mean hes aca type 2? No. Because thats not how aca type 2 works
It would depend on if it's constant or not.

Having your past erased once, wouldn't mean you can't create new history. However, if it's constantly being erased even as it's being made, then it's the same as having no past at all.
 
It would depend on if it's constant or not.

Having your past erased once, wouldn't mean you can't create new history. However, if it's constantly being erased even as it's being made, then it's the same as having no past at all.
Acheron's past was erased from the timeline. She can do things as of now.

I am not sure if you are a familiar with Genshin but it's the same way Wanderer has been removed with Irminsul from the history of the world giving him Acausality 1. She however gets Aca 2 because she is immune to any sort of predictions, precog and the likes. Again, I don't see a problem with making it Aca 4. But it's not the point of the current thread.
 
Last edited:
It would depend on if it's constant or not.

Having your past erased once, wouldn't mean you can't create new history. However, if it's constantly being erased even as it's being made, then it's the same as having no past at all.
The issue is the past isnt being constantly erased as i said in my summary. Characters remember her deeds in the past, they have logs of izumo, there are important scenes that wouldnt happen if acheron was deleted from those points in time
bumping so the responses are beside eachother i guess i should also preface that this thread isnt removing passive probability manip, the only reason it is brought up is because it contradicts Aca type 2
 
Characters remember her deeds in the past, they have logs of izumo, there are important scenes that wouldnt happen if acheron was deleted from those points in time
Characters remember her in modern history after meeting her AFTER the event. The erasure of her past happened hundreds of years ago. Why would she not be able to affect current history?

I've addressed the logs already.
 
Or it's about her not having a traceable origi
But this:
That lady's past? Nobody knows.

Doesn’t read like it’s supposed to be the consequent of this, by the way the sentence is read:
—is an Emanator who should not exist.

And this scene is done whilst it’s revealed that Acheron isn’t an Emanator of Hunt, but rather of Nihility iirc. Which would make contextual sense with my interpretation.

It would depend on if it's constant or not.

Having your past erased once, wouldn't mean you can't create new history. However, if it's constantly being erased even as it's being made, then it's the same as having no past at all.
The funny consequent of Acausality 2 is the implication that either Acheron survived Irontomb’s nuke, or she is dead currently in the story lol. Since Memory (Remembrance) is the past, then Cyrene wouldn’t be able to restore Acheron since her Nihility powers directly erase Memory, causing Enigmata (as seen in her Character Stories)
 
The funny consequent of Acausality 2 is the implication that either Acheron survived Irontomb’s nuke, or she is dead currently in the story lol. Since Memory (Remembrance) is the past, then Cyrene wouldn’t be able to restore Acheron since her Nihility powers directly erase Memory, causing Enigmata (as seen in her Character Stories)
I BROUGHT THIS UP EARLIER BTW
 
The proof is in the OP

Fuli specifically records memories of the universe to bring back the universe the present would be after the universe ends because terminus still exists so that means the flow of time also still exists so how is Fuli reviving acheron through memories if her memories dont exist?

Everything is explained in the messages i bumped

What does IX being the opposite of reality have to do with him witholding information? He knows what happened to izumo but wont tell anyone that is withholding information
^^
 
Also, realistically speaking, if Memory is the Past, then nobody would be able to remember Acheron… but we clearly know mfs do. Very likely it’s that the History EE is localized (mainly Izumo), the same way Enigmata erodes the past (which we know is explicitly related to Acheron’s past).

Very likely, I’d be fine with Acheron having passive History EE if anything.
 
Also, realistically speaking, if Memory is the Past, then nobody would be able to remember Acheron… but we clearly know mfs do. Very likely it’s that the History EE is localized (mainly Izumo), the same way Enigmata erodes the past (which we know is explicitly related to Acheron’s past).

Very likely, I’d be fine with Acheron having passive History EE if anything.
Self history EE i mean immune to memory manip ig
 
The funny consequent of Acausality 2 is the implication that either Acheron survived Irontomb’s nuke, or she is dead currently in the story lol. Since Memory (Remembrance) is the past, then Cyrene wouldn’t be able to restore Acheron since her Nihility powers directly erase Memory, causing Enigmata (as seen in her Character Stories)
Nova. I already addressed this. Multiple times. Cyrene captured the universe RIGHT BEFORE the nuke when Acheron was alive in the present. Aca 2 doesn't remove you from the present. Her history isn't being deleted every second constantly. There's nothing saying Aca 2 types aren't allowed to leave history. It's only her point of origin that was erased from the timeline. Btw, Cyrene, Herta and the TB tanked it too. They weren't erased like March or DH.

You're smarter than this.
Doesn’t read like it’s supposed to be the consequent of this, by the way the sentence is read:
I am sorry but this is just whatever.

Also, realistically speaking, if Memory is the Past, then nobody would be able to remember Acheron… but we clearly know mfs do. Very likely it’s that the History EE is localized (mainly Izumo), the same way Enigmata erodes the past (which we know is explicitly related to Acheron’s past).
Brother... Nobody remembers Acheron from the time of Izumo. Why do you two keep insisting on that? Those that remember her are the ones AFTER her past was erased. Which has nothing to do with her actions in the future.

Do people who interact with Scaramouche keep forgetting him everyday? Wtf?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top