The people on the thread I mentioned were largely in consensus that a single fireball from Character A would instantly kill Character B upon hitting, even though Character B is multiple tiers above Character A, and the OP of the thread directly stated that Character A's fire scales to their AP.
Huh, maybe the fire has special stuff I'm not aware about?
It negates heat resistance, but is otherwise normal (Albeit very hot, though not insanely so) fire. At least that's what I remember OP said.
Nobody is saying that. Heat has value(in temperatures), heat resistance has values. If your heat resistance is higher than heat, you are mostly fine.
1. We don't give characters abilities that author think should have. We give them only what they are shown to have
Some people have strong disgust reaction towards idea of weaker opponent beating much stronger one. Never understood this.
Yes. Only other one I know who could have it is Hiei.
She has molecule manip that activates when she gets mogged
I was told that Durability Negation is always just Durability Negation, no limitations, no matter how you do it.
Well her dura neg is tied to her dying
I still wouldn't call the hax itself limited. If even fire works, then actual matter manip shouldn't have a 'limit'. Whether or not she needs to be dying, the hax itself still does what it does.
Maybe they meant limited in application and that it can't be spammed by her?
Kai has negation of Invulnerability to fire attacks. Both of them are very specific abilities. Kai wouldn't be able to burn down guys that have higher fire resistance, than heat of his flames. So Bleach high tiers would be safe.
...Uhhhh
I thought it was a bad wiki because the concepts of fiction and vsdebating were dumb and bad.
It's a bad wiki because it has no Gundams.
Bruh, nobody was denying that WOG can be used for scaling. Site only has problems with it, if it's:
Agreed.
Leading question objection doesn't work because giving a report about one's opinions or personal life is seperate from an author exercising their authority to change the set of facts about a fictional world (Canon is the set of facts true to an imagined world) how they please. An author's WOG statement is saying 'This is true'
This is something I agree with. It has to be a contradiction though. Work says X, author says Not-X. If we go with 'uhhh well it wasn't shown so it doesn't count' we have Problems. Starting from the fact that we don't know what a universe looks like, so no universal feats can ever exist (same for anything infinite, can't be shown), that characters planet level or above don't always blow up planets in every fight even when they really should. Then there are franchises like Shin Megami Tensei who don't show things like galaxies blowing up on screen, despite being far more than multiversal in reality.
explain what those are
General form of leading questions:
For example, anything related to big shows with multiple writers. It should be unacceptable to:
Yeah but that has the same problem I mentioned. An author can literally make anything they want in the fiction true if they say, it is true. Unless it contradicts the fiction itself.
Agree.
You have ******* Gunpla not GUNDAM. THAT'S AN IN UNIVERSE TOY.
vsbattles.fandom.com
ONE CHARACTEROrga Itsuka
Orga Itsuka is a protagonist in Mobile Suit Gundam IRON-BLOODED ORPHANS. He was previously the leader of the Third Group of the Chryse Guard Security private military contractor. After he and the Third Group staged a mutiny against the adults of the organization and took it over, he renames the...
(One of the protagonists is close enough, right)?
You never specified how many pages needed to be here, just that they were here.
I will contribute to VS wiki when hell freezes over. I played Xenogears. I watched Gundam. And I know 100% VSwiki will overblow their power level to hell and back.
Nobody is stopping you from making threads to revise their stats.
I hate CRTs
Generally, you can make a page for a new character without a content revision thread.
I would rather nuke myself on the moon with a 10 gigaton nuclear bomb than do that
Ok then.
Reference to the strongest hypothetical planned nuke huh?
Neat, gnosticism is interesting.
I did not realize that at first. That's a pretty cool reference.
You can? I thought you needed to consult staff and fellow users.
