• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Does outrunning the destruction of a Low 2-C structure count as an Immeasurable speed feat?

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheHedgememe

They/Them
Messages
189
Reaction score
124
Say a character outruns the space-time continuum being destroyed with sheer speed. Does this fit our wiki's standards for Immeasurable speed, or would this fall under something akin to how we treat characters moving in timeless voids?
 
It's just range without further explanation.
Nah, if there's no explanation on how they did it besides it's seemly done through sheer speed, it can just be put in the speed section that they are MFTL+ (Of quite a high value, assuming it's a normal size universe of any finite length), but have the ability to somehow cross outside of the space-time continuum of the universe through there speed.
 
Yeah, outrunning it and not taking damage because well they never got touched by it.
I see. Makes sense. So they'd just have to be inside of it the entire time and not take damage from it? No exiting it at all in any capacity?
 
Generally, it doesn't. To "dodge" that you need two properties: being unaffected by your past being erased (that's gonna happen regardless) and leaving the spacetime continuum before the attack is fired. Only specific portrayals that involve doing things backwards through time would count.
 
Generally, it doesn't. To "dodge" that you need two properties: being unaffected by your past being erased (that's gonna happen regardless) and leaving the spacetime continuum before the attack is fired. Only specific portrayals that involve doing things backwards through time would count.
Would you be kind enough to note this down in our speed page somewhere? With regards to dodging or outpacing explosions that encompass entire space-time continuums and bigger structures?

Would you also be kind enough to make a note regarding HDE characters and whether or not they qualify for Immeasurable speed and what-have-you?
 
Last edited:
Generally, it doesn't. To "dodge" that you need two properties: being unaffected by your past being erased (that's gonna happen regardless) and leaving the spacetime continuum before the attack is fired. Only specific portrayals that involve doing things backwards through time would count.
Will this effect Undertale's immeasurable speed rating?
 
Would you be kind enough to note this down in our speed page somewhere? With regards to dodging or outpacing explosions that encompass entire space-time continuums and bigger structures?
Would need a CRT to be added. Guess I can make one later.
Would you also be kind enough to make a note regarding HDE characters and whether or not they qualify for Immeasurable speed and what-have-you?
Isn't that already clear by the tiering faq?

Will this effect Undertale's immeasurable speed rating?
Idk.
 
Would need a CRT to be added. Guess I can make one later.
Staff thread you mean.

Apparently not. I have seen people claim that by being the size of multiple temporal dimensions (Like say, being a 4-D or a 5-D being bigger than a 4-D spacetime or a 5-D multiverse respectively) could get it, claiming that it would automatically involve traversing moving in multiple temporal dimensions. I guess we should clarify that as well.
 
Apparently not. I have seen people claim that by being the size of multiple temporal dimensions (Like say, being a 4-D or a 5-D being bigger than a 4-D spacetime or a 5-D multiverse respectively) could get it, claiming that it would automatically involve traversing moving in multiple temporal dimensions. I guess we should clarify that as well.
I mean, there is a difference between being bigger than temporal dimensions and encompassing temporal dimensions. Although, I guess at the latter, we are technically more talking omnipresence.
 
I mean, there is a difference between being bigger than temporal dimensions and encompassing temporal dimensions. Although, I guess at the latter, we are technically more talking omnipresence.
Moreso talking about guys like these (This one is plain 4D, his face is larger than an infinite-sized spacetime continuum) and these (As big as a 5D Low 1-C Multiversal structure). People argued that because they are that large that they are bound to move across multiple temporal dimensions by virtue of their size alone, and thus, be Immeasurable.
 
Last edited:
Moreso talking about guys like these (This one is plain 4D, his face is larger than an infinite-sized spacetime continuum) and these (As big as a 5D Low 1-C Multiversal structure). People argued that because they are that large that they are bound to move across multiple temporal dimensions by virtue of their size alone, and thus, be Immeasurable.
@DontTalkDT
 
I mean, there is a difference between being bigger than temporal dimensions and encompassing temporal dimensions. Although, I guess at the latter, we are technically more talking omnipresence.
I mean, there are multiple non-omnipresent characters that are simply, physically bigger than a structure with a temporal dimension. Regardless of how we rate that, it would be good to have a consistent stated standard on it. The FAQ does a good job with it but I don't think there's a good enough demarcation between the Bulk Beings and any character who can physically hold a timeline like a marble.
 
Yeah no I completely disagree with the idea of "outrunning the destruction of a timeline with just physical movement is not immeasurable" when the basis of Immeasurable is to bypass linear space-time with sheer speed, but that's gonna be for the CRT ig.
 
@DontTalkDT We really need your response here.
Funny, I was in the middle of writing it.
Moreso talking about guys like these (This one is plain 4D, his face is larger than an infinite-sized spacetime continuum) and these (As big as a 5D Low 1-C Multiversal structure). People argued that because they are that large that they are bound to move across multiple temporal dimensions by virtue of their size alone, and thus, be Immeasurable.
Just spatial size alone should do nothing. If they occupy time, then as said.
I mean, there are multiple non-omnipresent characters that are simply, physically bigger than a structure with a temporal dimension. Regardless of how we rate that, it would be good to have a consistent stated standard on it. The FAQ does a good job with it but I don't think there's a good enough demarcation between the Bulk Beings and any character who can physically hold a timeline like a marble.
So, would adding something like this at the end of the FAQ section be enough?
Characters who are merely larger than a timeline in terms of spatial size or occupy more spatial dimensions than the spacetime of a timeline as a whole do not qualify as having Immeasurable speed for the same reason. Characters whose size occupies the time dimension itself, however, can be ranked as being (nigh-)omnipresent throughout time. They wouldn't qualify for Immeasurable, as they can't move through time, on grounds of already occupying all of time.
 
That's impossible even with immeasurable speed.
I was going off prior precedents when I posted that, and a feat granting immeasurable speed vs immeasurable speed can do that are two different scenarios (Like how just having immeasurable speed won't allow you to dodge temporal omnipresence, though some characters gained immeasurable speed because they have that feat).
 
Last edited:
So, would adding something like this at the end of the FAQ section be enough?
Characters who are merely larger than a timeline in terms of spatial size or occupy more spatial dimensions than the spacetime of a timeline as a whole do not qualify as having Immeasurable speed for the same reason. Characters whose size occupies the time dimension itself, however, can be ranked as being (nigh-)omnipresent throughout time. They wouldn't qualify for Immeasurable, as they can't move through time, on grounds of already occupying all of time.
@Executor_N0 @Planck69 @Elizhaa @LephyrTheRevanchist @Qawsedf234 @Maverick_Zero_X @Just a Random Butler This look alright to you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top