• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Expanding structure with a time axis destruction feat

No to.... what exactly? That's exactly what I had just said....
I mean, from how I read your post, I thought you were doubting what was written, so I said no as in "No, the standard is right, don't worry", my bad if that wasn't clear.
Not if you don't agree with time being continuous as opposed to being discrete, planck time anyone?
Obviously, but the whole "time works that way over another way" is how VSBW postulate it in the first place, so unless stated otherwise in-verse, we will always assume it works the same way.
 
I forgor
I will explain the situation that I have this question about, without specifying the verse it comes from to avoid unnecessary bias. Thre is also a purpose of making it a general situation

There is structure A that is a separate space-time continuum (with its own time axis). This structure is not universe sized at the moment. However, A is constantly expanding its size at a FTL speed. Character B comes to A, when it's not yet universe sized and destroys both the physical and the temporal parts of it.
Question: would that still count as Low 2-C, due to B also technically destroying its future, universe (and bigger) sized version?

Note 1: If a similar situation had already been asked, please notify me and provide the link
Note 2: If you know, which verse this question comes from, please refrain from openly stating it in this thread
So, before answering this I will come with a caveat: The first line doesn't work. The verse in question 100% determines the surrounding context of the feat and what it amounts to. What can work in some franchises doesn't work in others.

But to answer your question, this space, as long as it reaches a size deemed significant enough (so vaguely universal), it would be Low 2-C. But it would first need to reach that size for the feat to count as a Tier 2 feat. If it was a room-sized zone that in a quadrillion years would reach universal size, you'd only get a Low 2-C rating after a quadrillion years have passed, to the best of my knowledge.
 
But to answer your question, this space, as long as it reaches a size deemed significant enough (so vaguely universal), it would be Low 2-C. But it would first need to reach that size for the feat to count as a Tier 2 feat. If it was a room-sized zone that in a quadrillion years would reach universal size, you'd only get a Low 2-C rating after a quadrillion years have passed, to the best of my knowledge.
Doesn't 4D destruction work by destroying every snapshot on the time axis? I thought this might count for AP, but no range. Anyways, thanks for replying
 
There is allegedly a planned revision where a structure with temporal axis to be Low 2-C by default, but either way, given the inflation aspect and future periods having a "Will reach universe sized" that's enough for Low 2-C.
Do you know when this revision will take place? It's just that if this thread doesn't end up as agreement, then I can still do a sh*t ton of work and prove that the structure is L2C anyways or I can wait for this revision and get it in like 2 seconds
 
Do you know when this revision will take place? It's just that if this thread doesn't end up as agreement, then I can still do a sh*t ton of work and prove that the structure is L2C anyways or I can wait for this revision and get it in like 2 seconds
2047 or longer
 
There is allegedly a planned revision where a structure with temporal axis to be Low 2-C by default, but either way, given the inflation aspect and future periods having a "Will reach universe sized" that's enough for Low 2-C.
Are there any other time frames or even how certain is this revision taking place. It seems another 11 page mess can start in my fandom. It would honestly be easier to confirm the probability
 
Back
Top