• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Do Branched Timelines Count as Low 2-C?

Messages
989
Reaction score
596
I have a question: if there's a single timeline or space-time continuum that features branches—whether finite or infinite—would this structure still be classified as Low 2-C? Does there need to be clear evidence that these alternate timelines are completely separate from each other for the entire structure to qualify as 2-B or even 2-A?

If it remains Low 2-C, would the complete destruction of one of these timelines, without affecting the main one or the others, still count as a Low 2-C feat?
 
if it branches it should be counted as 2-C at least
Isn't it assumed that, since they are a branch and share the same past, they are part of the same structure? And therefore, they are 2-C Low, especially if an explicit branch is represented by a main timeline and other lines that diverge from it.

I want to know if, by default, it would be 2-C Low and, only with the compatibility of their separateness, it would be 2-B/2-A.
 
I have a question: if there's a single timeline or space-time continuum that features branches—whether finite or infinite—would this structure still be classified as Low 2-C? Does there need to be clear evidence that these alternate timelines are completely separate from each other for the entire structure to qualify as 2-B or even 2-A?

If it remains Low 2-C, would the complete destruction of one of these timelines, without affecting the main one or the others, still count as a Low 2-C feat?
Depends if the branch timelines there are actualized (2-B/2-A is sufficient depending it's a finite or infinite branch timelines that's actualized) or not, better off if there are statements about each branch timeline being a different space-time continuum but generally that's only a supporting evidence. Main evidence if we don't know the branch timelines are actualized or not. You could get hypertimeline through that

If it remains Low 2-C because they're not actualized (Remains as a possibility, this doesn't apply to MWI though contrary to popular belief where timelines in MWI only exist as a possibility when they're actualized), the destruction of the main timeline probably.
 
Depends if the branch timelines there are actualized (2-B/2-A is sufficient depending it's a finite or infinite branch timelines that's actualized) or not, better off if there are statements about each branch timeline being a different space-time continuum but generally that's only a supporting evidence. Main evidence if we don't know the branch timelines are actualized or not. You could get hypertimeline through that

If it remains Low 2-C because they're not actualized (Remains as a possibility, this doesn't apply to MWI though contrary to popular belief where timelines in MWI only exist as a possibility when they're actualized), the destruction of the main timeline probably.
But what happens when we are explicitly shown through a clear representation that these timelines are connected and share the same past?

 
But what happens when we are explicitly shown through a clear representation that these timelines are connected and share the same past?


It still depends with the statement and how it's portrayed, if you were referring about MCU. That sacred timeline is basically a hypertimeline btw, the cosmology page explains this
 
It still depends with the statement and how it's portrayed, if you were referring about MCU. That sacred timeline is basically a hypertimeline btw, the cosmology page explains this
Under a standard assumption, it's said that each major decision creates a branching or temporal variation, often illustrated with an image like the one I shared above. What level would that correspond to?
 
Under a standard assumption, it's said that each major decision creates a branching or temporal variation, often illustrated with an image like the one I shared above. What level would that correspond to?
Low 2-C normally, generally to be higher than that, at the least there should be like a Multiverse concept introduced. Then you could get higher than that (If you watch Multiverse of Madness, you'll understand what I meant by this)
 
Back
Top