• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Honkai: Star Rail Discussion Thread

Screenshot-2026-04-24-205136.png
☠️
What the 😭
 
wait so theres like 6 emanators on planarcadia and 2 aeons (3 if we count lan almost sniping the planet)... yea theres gotta be something beyond aeons cause we're getting to endgame levels of power waaaaaaaaaaay too quick

maybe in washtopia they will reveal smthn
 
I have a question.

What are the flaws of Cyrene narratively? I saw tons of people saying she is badly written for some reason.
Personally, I don't have any strong feelings regarding Cyrene. I just think the issue she had was the execution of concept.

We spend a majority of our time after 3.4 with a person who completely imitates the PhiLia093 data signal, or "Peach" in her words. She looks like Cyrene, talks with the same voice as Cyrene but she wasn't Cyrene - at least from what we (and even the Demiurge herself) was aware of at the time.

Even the Trailblazer in 3.5 asks a question at the start regarding if she was Cyrene or not, in which her answer was "no" yet she still wished for us to call her Cyrene anyway because its who she physically had become.

Additionally, when we awakened Khaslana in 3.7, we saw the difference in how a character who knew the original PhiLia093 viewed the Demiurge. He didn't call her Cyrene, he called her Mem. You can even see a hint of sadness in the Demiurge's eyes from how he addressed her as she repeated Cyrene's promise to Phainon in the 0th cycle.

The tragedy of her character is that only at the very end when she chooses to gaze back upon the world to close off causality, she learns that in truth, her and PhiLia093, the one who she looked up to and tried to follow in their footsteps so hard, were always the same person.

But by that point in the story, there is no time to establish that realization further with any other character because she had already made the choice to stay behind.
 
I think the prime issue with Cyrene's character is her personality is exclusively the parts people loved of Elysia's character.

She's not constructed from anything that gave Elysia depth. The parts excluded from Cyrene are the reasons why we truly remember Elysia's character:
  • Her charming but narcissistic way of saying things. That slight insensitiveness towards others.
  • Her intriguing plotpoints like being a traitor, being nice on a surface level but everyone around her not fully trusting her.
  • The air of mystery we got around Elysia's character.
  • The way she'd hide her true strength, only leaving it for small moments you'd never expect it like checking if Mei is wearing mascara. It made her more intimidating, gave her more character. You didn't know what she was truly capable of.

Cyrene is a mishmash of Elysia's character, her nice-ities, how she likes everyone and tries to unite everyone, how she makes a big sacrifice for the future, but not much else is given to her. She's not dissimilar enough to Elysia to be her own character while not being similar enough to give Elysia fans what they want.

It's all the style took from Elysia with none of the substance that made people truly enjoy her character. It doesn't help Cyrene gets no time to interact with other characters. She needed far more than one patch.
 
It's all the style took from Elysia with none of the substance that made people truly enjoy her character.
Not sure If I should played Honkai 3rd impact then. I didn't, and still enjoyed Cyrene character.

If I know Elysia before, would I hater her too? Saying Cyrene have no substance is a 🙅‍♂️
She needed far more than one patch.
Facts. It would be better that her relantionship with Phainon got a little more flesh out.
 
If I know Elysia before, would I hater her too? Saying Cyrene have no substance is a 🙅‍♂️
IMO it just feels like a worse attempt at Elysia and it makes me dislike Cyrene more for it. It's not that I hate her character, it's just that she has no character of her own from my perspective. I like how Cyrene actually becomes a thing listening to the eras of tales from each cycle's Cyrene, but in terms of actual interaction and character moments with the cast it feels like she has next to nothing. Mem is hardly memorable either.
 
Facts. It would be better that her relantionship with Phainon got a little more flesh out.
heavy on this. the patch literally starts out with smallrene and phainon playing together hell we see them go to the end of the world together yet they have like no chemestry theres barely even a friendship she just starts saying she loves the trailblazer out of nowhere n shit lowkey pmo. also doesnt even build relationships with the other chrysos heirs unlike elysia
 
The problem is that they wrote the Demiurge in a way that intentionally separates her from the Chrysos Heirs, where she doesn't view PhiLia093's experiences and memories as her own, with her and the audience only learning the full picture at the very end of the story. Because of this, characters treated her simply as a separate entity who shares the appearance of Cyrene.

She cannot convey anything to Phainon to give him closure regarding his promise because as far as she and everyone else was aware, she was not the person who forged that promise with him 33 million lifetimes ago. Phainon recognized this the moment he saw her, and thus views the Demiurge as the result of Cyrene's struggle within the Nameless Tomb who came to wear the same appearance as his childhood friend out of admiration for them. This results in their interaction in 3.7 being very bittersweet, because on one hand Phainon sees a person who looks like Cyrene, has the same voice as her, but isn't her, while the Demiurge is melancholic at the fact that she is unable to console Khaslana because her words would not carry the same weight as hers (Cyrene/Peach).

Ultimately we do learn that the Demiurge and PhiLia093 were actually the same person, but for the vast majority of the story it was not treated that way due to the absence of such information. This leads to the feeling of contrivance, which could've avoided had they emphasized more on the Demiurge's identity crisis which would've allowed it to become a more obvious strength of her character.

As for the repeated talk about love and stuff like that, it does feel like it lacks nuance because we go from seeing a person fueled by immense hatred and wrath manage an impossible feat that defied all understanding which gave us the chance to even save the world, to all of a sudden denouncing hatred and viewing it purely as an "evil" or "wrong" motive. If that is truly the final writing decision on the duality of Love and Hate in Amphoreus I think that's a real shame, but it feels so jarring that it might be a chekov's gun (if we follow Empedocles Theory of the Cosmos, which seems to be the clear inspiration for this relationship of Love and Hate).
 
There was a CN ad of Phainon that said "Love and Hate are not opposites, they will eventually converge." which is pretty much the idea behind Empedocles's Theory. When Hate is too dominant, the roots of the cosmos separate and drives the elements apart causing suffering. When Love is too dominant, the roots of the cosmos join together in harmony and causes the world to become unchanging and stagnant. Only when both are equally in contention with each other can the world gain its dynamism and diversity, which allows for life to flourish and civilization to progress. This might be the conditions necessary for Amphoreus to become real.
 
to all of a sudden denouncing hatred and viewing it purely as an "evil" or "wrong" motive. If that is truly the final writing decision on the duality of Love and Hate in Amphoreus I think that's a real shame,
That’s because Shaoji was larping two separate philosophies.

§3.5.3. It is not appropriate to disbelieve that Love is a real existent, that is, a Substance produced from a Substance, less than the producer, but still a Substance. For that higher Soul, too, was a Substance that came to be from the activity and got its life from that which was prior because it to it, that is, from the Substance that consists of Beings both looked towards that which was primary Being and looked at it with great intensity. And this was its first object of sight and it looked at it as to its own good and rejoiced in the sight; and the sight was the sort of thing to ensure that which sees makes its gaze not into an attendant activity but so as to produce, by means of pleasure and reaching out to it and of gaze, something from it that is worthy of it and of the sight. And so from that which is intently active about what is seen and from a kind of out-flowing from the thing seen, the eye was filled, just as physical seeing is found along with the image [of the thing seen], and Love came into being.
For what is ugly is opposed to both nature and to god. For nature produces by looking towards beauty and it looks towards what is defined, which is ‘in the column of the good’. But the indefinite is base and in the other column. Nature comes into being from the intelligible world, from the Good and, clearly, from Beauty. If anyone is in love with and akin to anything, he is drawn also to its images.
Actually, in pursuit of Kronos, then, or, if you prefer, Heaven, the father of Kronos, she turns her activity towards him, establishes an affinity to him, falls in love and brings forth Love. And together with Love she looks towards Kronos. And her activity has fashioned a real existent, that is, a Substance. And both of them look to the intelligible world. And the mother who gave him birth and beautiful Love who has come into being as a real existent that is always ranged towards another beauty, having its existence in this other beauty, in a sort of mid position between the one longing and the one longed for; he is the eye of the one longing and by means of its eye provides the lover with the sight of what is longed for, while Love himself runs ahead and is filled with the vision before providing the lover with the power of seeing through the organ of visual perception. He is ahead, not like a person seeing by fixing his gaze on the object of his longing, but by himself plucking the fruit of the vision of beauty while it runs past him.
In (Neo)platonism, Love (Philia) is the component of the Soul produced after it witnesses the good that is prior to it, i.e Intellect (Nous). In a sense, it is the intermediary between Intellect itself and the Soul, being like the eye of a person conveying an image between the observer and the observed.

And as Nature (Phusis), is produced by being directed towards goodness (the higher principles), it is so that the movement and production of all other things in the cosmos is a derivative of things being directed towards goodness and contemplating such goodness, and then exemplifying what they see in the higher principles through their activity (expressed principles).

Particularly speaking, it is also held (in contrast to Gnostics), that the material world is not to be hated, rather it is to be loved. For what exists in the material world is still an image of the good in the higher principles (The Platonic Forms), and thus the beauty found in the sensible world makes you aware and re-directs you to the beauty of the intelligible world (Intellect/Nous).

Thing is, then, that the mover of the Universe in Platonism is “Love” itself, which is what he was trying to imply with Cyrene and the Erudtion.

Yet, he also takes the wild (and incompatible) decision to also establish Empedocles’ philosophy, which is rather contradictory with what is seen above.

When Love is too dominant, the roots of the cosmos join together in harmony and causes the world to become unchanging and stagnant.
This, for example, is directly referenced in the Fourth Finality being Remembrance, which is “Love” causing the entire Universe to stagnate and freeze, which is not possible if he was truly appealing to Platonism. (“Destruction” being the “Hate” that causes everything to separate)

But whatever, that’s just what I think. Maybe Shaoji just has 10000IQ and us mortals can’t understand his writing or sum shit.
 
Last edited:
So we have 3 CRTs open.
  • 1 is Voidnether's where he edited Zephyro stuff in and needs 1 more staff approval for the other thing.
  • 1 is Nova's where he deals with Zephyro and Scepter stuff.
  • 1 is Scoops where he moves base Firefly to unknown.

This Welt stuff IS that serious, huh?
 
So we have 3 CRTs open.
  • 1 is Voidnether's where he edited Zephyro stuff in and needs 1 more staff approval for the other thing.
  • 1 is Nova's where he deals with Zephyro and Scepter stuff.
  • 1 is Scoops where he moves base Firefly to unknown.

This Welt stuff IS that serious, huh?
Don't forget pompom
 
tbh they needed 1 more patch dedicated to cyrene only. and they should've focused on her "lament" mobile more. there was so much potential there. her selfishly freezing the universe to preserve just one planet was glorious but they completely ignored that.
 
I have a question.

What are the flaws of Cyrene narratively? I saw tons of people saying she is badly written for some reason.
Its development should have been addressed in 3.5 and extended over the rest of the Amphoreus arc, and its conclusion should have been placed in 3.7; they put almost everything in 3.7
Without meaning to make a pun, one of the most important characters in the arc is literally anecdotal until the very end of that same arc
I like Cyrène and I understand her theme about love, etc., but honestly, I don't connect with it and there's a false note. It's like listening to an orchestra but the music sounds off and you can't quite put your finger on the problem
I like the character, but I'm definitely hesitant to remove her from my top 5 Amphoreus characters; there's really something about her that bothers me
 
Deadass you must be the only one who does stuff in the hsr-verse cause the only mf people ping / person who is told to do stuff is you

Also the March reunion in 3.6 had more impact than anything in 3.7 ever will
Subjective take : March and Evernight have a better writing potential than Cyrene
No, really, the scene with March is truly moving
 
Subjective take : March and Evernight have a better writing potential than Cyrene
No, really, the scene with March is truly moving
I like how it actually adds on the character's dynamics and really makes it feel like the characters do know and care for each other, because they should. They basically spend most of their time with each other on the Express and this fact isn't represented like this literally anywhere up until 3.6. It's why it's the 2nd best past in Amphoreus behind 3.4, IMO, because also there the dynamics have been built up with Phainon and the others.

I love how the characters instantly know it IS march the moment she replies with 'Ace' because it's the tone she speaks in. I like the banter afterwards where they ACTUALLY feel like companions and characters. The game needs more grounded moments like these to actually make you care about the characters, rather than constant high-octane ones facing new foes and enemies.
 
Back
Top