- 6,547
- 6,297
So HP, nibelung and bina.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
[Genshin] 4-A God-Tiers Upgrade 😰 (🥀)
- Thread starter MSahla
- Start date
- Status
- 2,347
- 594
It's okay, I won't elaborate further, as my points are in the previous argument.
And yes, this fake sky issue will probably be discussed in detail in a separate CRT.
Thunderman101
He/Him- 3,426
- 809
thread accepted in one day
- 12,483
- 16,845
- 8,473
- 3,053
- Thread starter
- #85
The Shades too right? I remember Planck (Ap and Dura only) and Reiner agreed in the previous CRT that y'all agree the Shades can upscale from Moon Goddesses.
And you have said this before:
Morever, there's literally no way that Columbina is above the Four Shades since the shades themselves hierarchically higher than Columbina herself and just one level below the Heavenly Principles. And there's a lot of thing to suggest the Shades is superior than the Moon Goddeses.
Last edited:
- 8,473
- 3,053
- Thread starter
- #86
The Current God-Tier characters as the title says. So Nibelung, Four Shades, Sinners, and Sovereigns.
Well, don't say "They don't deserve it! He shouldn't be the same tier!" Because we're talking about the current one. So, them deserving as in the god tier or not is for another crt.
- 8,473
- 3,053
- Thread starter
- #88
[Genshin] 4-A God-Tiers Upgrade 😰 >GRACE<
I mean, it is 100% up to you to show the dimensions are legit. Specially when past cases show they actually aren't legit. If you can't... Tuff luck there. That’s true, but if visual evidence doesn’t present a contradiction or inconsistency, does that invalidate the existence of celestial...
- 5,366
- 2,829
3 pages long and bro already negative tracked this
- 6,547
- 6,297
I don’t believe sinners really deserve that (Rerir fighting Weekend Bina doesn’t count). As for the Sovereigns, I’d put them in the “likely” or “possibly” at best.
No
- 8,473
- 3,053
- Thread starter
- #91
Surely the Shades have legit rating, cause.. That's like an obvious thing and you should know that.
And Reiner, Lephyr and Planck was agreed that the Shades can upscale in the previous CRT.
- 8,473
- 3,053
- Thread starter
- #92
It is tho. See Lephyr's conclusion:
[Genshin] 4-A God-Tiers Upgrade 😰 >GRACE<
I mean, it is 100% up to you to show the dimensions are legit. Specially when past cases show they actually aren't legit. If you can't... Tuff luck there. That’s true, but if visual evidence doesn’t present a contradiction or inconsistency, does that invalidate the existence of celestial...
Mbpoops
He/Him- 8,361
- 7,510
We csnt ask questions anymore?
- 6,547
- 6,297
I didn't said anything about shades tho.
- 299
- 112
@LephyrTheRevanchist
I have something to point out. The phrase “light-years” is a mistranslation. The original text does not contain the phrase “light-years.”
"距离遥远的星星突然坠落在地，按理说这不可能。但事实就是如此矛盾。",
- 8,473
- 3,053
- Thread starter
- #96
Well, now you should.
- 5,366
- 2,829
Asked the most obvious question award
- 299
- 112
No. It's the same sentence.
I checked the original text at this link and confirmed that it is the same.
"1448689234": "Theoretically, it's not possible for stars that are goodness knows how many light-years away to suddenly turn into meteors and fall out of the sky. But, however paradoxical it may be, this is the reality.",
"1448689234": "距离遥远的星星突然坠落在地，按理说这不可能。但事实就是如此矛盾。",
- 8,473
- 3,053
- Thread starter
- #100
No. It's the same sentence.
I checked the original text at this link and confirmed that it is the same.
"1448689234": "Theoretically, it's not possible for stars that are goodness knows how many light-years away to suddenly turn into meteors and fall out of the sky. But, however paradoxical it may be, this is the reality.",
"1448689234": "距离遥远的星星突然坠落在地，按理说这不可能。但事实就是如此矛盾。",
Yh
- 2,347
- 594
These things are actually irrelevant to continue, because what is accepted has nothing to do with false sky.No. It's the same sentence.
I checked the original text at this link and confirmed that it is the same.
"1448689234": "Theoretically, it's not possible for stars that are goodness knows how many light-years away to suddenly turn into meteors and fall out of the sky. But, however paradoxical it may be, this is the reality.",
"1448689234": "距离遥远的星星突然坠落在地，按理说这不可能。但事实就是如此矛盾。",
Regardless, proof that stars are real is found in several things I discussed earlier.
- 299
- 112
I simply wanted to point out that since you’re using point 1 as evidence, you can’t use one of the four pieces of evidence. I didn’t mean to disagree with the content of this thread.
- 2,347
- 594
Yeah ok,, the first point is partly invalidated due to a mistranslation
- 12,483
- 16,845
The feat that is being accepted anyways is the one by Columbina, so no worries there. Thank you tho.
- 8,473
- 3,053
- Thread starter
- #105
Yurr... I was asking something about the scaling. The shades gotta too right?
- 12,483
- 16,845
"And whoever scales above her" I believe is self explanatory, is it not?
- 8,473
- 3,053
- Thread starter
- #107
I get what you mean on that, but apparently Twilight wasn't consider the Shades that way, so just wanna confirm it from you.
- 12,483
- 16,845
In the profiles, right now, are they scaling above her? If yes, there you go.
- 8,473
- 3,053
- Thread starter
- #109
so let me get this straight aight.
Legit = Shades and Nibelung
Possibly/Likely = the Sovereigns
Not legit = Sinners.
Last two was from @TWILIGHT-OP's personal opinion. Anyone wanna add?
Legit = Shades and Nibelung
Possibly/Likely = the Sovereigns
Not legit = Sinners.
Last two was from @TWILIGHT-OP's personal opinion. Anyone wanna add?
- 2,986
- 932
We are 6 years into this game and people still dont know which are the top tiers, it isnt as if Sovereing and Shades fought for 40 years and Sinners have statments that compared them to Sovereings (The 3 groups are equals)
Saqphire
She/Her- 1,573
- 1,884
I was about to say "Throw a f*cking discussion rule on this" cuz it would be the third time I've seen 4-A Genshin be accepted just to get nuked a week later cuz the mods who accepted it did it too hastily.
This seems to be fine though and I agree with what staff are saying FRA, although I personally disagree with it scaling to her durability/striking strength; it seems to be a creation feat she can't really like, casually do and more so an ultimate attack. Moreover, I'm not sure if elements or kuhvaaki would be an UES with the new standards coming in place, and I wouldn't apply anything related to UES rn in case it wouldn't fly by the standards regardless
This seems to be fine though and I agree with what staff are saying FRA, although I personally disagree with it scaling to her durability/striking strength; it seems to be a creation feat she can't really like, casually do and more so an ultimate attack. Moreover, I'm not sure if elements or kuhvaaki would be an UES with the new standards coming in place, and I wouldn't apply anything related to UES rn in case it wouldn't fly by the standards regardless
- 264
- 137
You’re right. I concede GG.
Columbina would totally WASTE solar system level energy to fight an opponent she’s on par with!
- 12,483
- 16,845
That's precisely why I asked for a showing of Stabilization. Since she can passively sustain the dimension whether in combat or outside of it, yet she puts more effort into attacking, she does show her energy upscale to the creation feat. After that, it's simple powerscaling. Her attacks damage opponents but don't one shot them, so they scale. They dish it back, so she herself scales.
- 264
- 137
What are your standards? There’s nothing here that works under any legible standards.
I seriously doubt you’re accepting stuff that is blatantly contradictory with the narrative. Or the fact that you can’t even prove that they’re really stars in the first place. There’s not even an argument to apply the standard to in the first place. We’ve disregarded many feats like this due to the fact that we cannot prove the celestial bodies in question to be real.
- 12,483
- 16,845
I already linked them, asked for proof, and proof got provided. You may disagree, the wiki disagrees with us. It is what it is.
- 264
- 137
- 264
- 137
Can you link the proof that they provided you?
- 12,483
- 16,845
...when we are given a reason to doubt them. Whether that be the stars not behaving as they should or mitigating circumstances outside of it, like with the other pocket dimension feats (which were rejected in this very thread).
Columbina's, seemingly, has not contradictions (I asked for them, because I don't have verse knowledge). None were provided. Instead, the opposition keeps asking to ignore it, and nah fam. Prove your claim.
Saqphire
She/Her- 1,573
- 1,884
Unless I'm tweaking, I don't see in the video how Columbina is actively putting in energy to keep it up (and thus stabilising it), she just creates it and boom it's done.
- 12,483
- 16,845
Once the fight is over, the dimension disappears. That points to her sustaining it.
- Status
