• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Tier 0 Starfield

Status
Not open for further replies.
FriendOfTheTeaParty

FriendOfTheTeaParty

Messages
7,723
Reaction score
9,194
I think they should still have the usual match formats as it's not impossible for the profiles having their tier being downgraded.
 
Its supposed to be on the page even if they arent made for matchups. Someone else will just edit in after its posting anyways.
 
Ebihara said:
Its supposed to be on the page even if they arent made for matchups. Someone else will just edit in after its posting anyways.
Click to expand...
I don't think it needs to be on there at all due to sheer redundancy. Other tier 0 pages also just have had no match up parts for a long time. I'm not arguing about this further so stop derailing.
O0DSF0o said:
Look even if you disagree, page format n shit + I like how pages look with them
Click to expand...
 
BestMGQScalerEver said:
I don't think it needs to be on there at all due to sheer redundancy. Other tier 0 pages also just have had no match up parts for a long time. I'm not arguing about this further so stop derailing.
Click to expand...
Its not derailing. There is nothing to argure about. Youre wrong. it should be added. If you feel this should change site wide make a staff thread but you thinking its redundant is not a valid reason to exclude it. Charcter could get downgraded or get another key. And the "agurement" it can be added later is still not a reason to incorrectly make the page. There are many charcters on this site that just arent suitable for matchups and they still have this section, cause that's how you format profiles.

vsbattles.fandom.com

Standard Format for Character Profiles

When there are multiple versions of a character that are distinct enough to be split into several profiles, whether it is due to the length and complexity of the page or versions from different mediums, then the multiple pages that are created as a result of this have to be linked by a...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

It does not say optional. Just cause others made pages incorrectly doesnt mean you should
 
Last edited:
Ebihara said:
Its not derailing. There is nothing to argure about. Youre wrong. it should be added. If you feel this should change site wide make a staff thread but you thinking its redundant is not a valid reason to exclude it. Charcter could get downgraded or get another key. And the "agurement" it can be added later is still not a reason to incorrectly make the page. There are many charcters on this site that just arent suitable for matchups and they still have this section, cause that's how you format profiles.

vsbattles.fandom.com

Standard Format for Character Profiles

When there are multiple versions of a character that are distinct enough to be split into several profiles, whether it is due to the length and complexity of the page or versions from different mediums, then the multiple pages that are created as a result of this have to be linked by a...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

It does not say optional. Just cause others made pages incorrectly doesnt mean you should
Click to expand...
I don't really care.
 
I don't think you need to add the matchup part ngl. Not only it just doesn't work (You will NEVER be able to actually make 2 tier 0s fight. So, you're just adding it to make the page more cluttered without any actual reason besides "muh rules"), but there are stuff where if it serves no purpose, it can just safely be deleted.

I remember when I added a page and the for the notable attack sections (iirc), I didn't add anything, and a content mod deleted it and said it is not necessary if it serves no purpose. There are also stuff like "Feats" where it is mentioned in the Standard Format, and yet there are many pages that just don't add it and it's fine.

Basically, why would you make the page/profile longer for no reason? The matchups are there because it is possible to make them fight other dudes, but for the Tier 0 stuff, it is explicitly mentioned that it is absurd to make tier 0s fight;
Tier 0 characters cannot meaningfully fight, since there can be no coordinated multiplicity of them such that they make "two" (or any number of) entities. Furthermore, any battle implies interaction towards something else, which is likewise Impossible in their case, as pluralities of entities have been blocked. Therefore, the idea of such a battle is simply absurd in-and-of-itself.
Click to expand...
So, there's no actual reason to add it, as it serves no purpose whatsoever.

Regardless, I agree with the thread.
 
Planck69 said:
A Tier 0 addition 100% needs more than 1 admin and 2 thread mods.
Click to expand...
I think it literally just needs 3 votes 1 of them being an admin. Just that its "preferred" for there to be more and not required.

Edit: Yea
  • For content revisions that affect Tier 2or higher, the participation of at least one Administrator in the review and approval process is required.
    • The Administrator(s) should provide their evaluations and input regarding the suggested revision, and their decision will be given significant weight in the final determination of approval.
  • The review and approval of content revisions that affect Tier 1 and/or Tier 0 ratings or that are highly controversial should preferably be conducted by a larger number of staff members in order to ensure that all relevant parties are aware of and agree with the proposed changes. It is essential that these revisions are evaluated by staff members who possess a reasonable level of genuine understanding and expertise in these areas in order to maintain the accuracy and quality of the revised material.
Click to expand...
Oblivion falls under the reasonable level criteria I think since he frequently does tier 0 stuff too.

But I'll see and wait for more
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

FriendOfTheTeaParty
  • Locked
Tier 0 surreal indie game (Disillusion & Disillusion ST)
Replies
27
Views
3K
Vietthai96
Vietthai96
Azertyhuuh
  • Locked
Restoring The Creator to Tier 0 once again.
4 5 6
Replies
218
Views
12K
Azertyhuuh
Azertyhuuh
Para_Pala_Zula
  • Locked
The Dark Tower Tier 0 Upgrade
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Vesxpura
  • Locked
Wannabe Nasuverse Tier 0 Wank CRT(Re:Creators)
2 3
Replies
94
Views
9K
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
FriendOfTheTeaParty
Neither High 1-A+ or Tier 0 (Self-Reference Engine Downgrade)
2
Replies
64
Views
8K
Dihdksuxch
Dihdksuxch
Back
Top