- 177,301
- 90,180
What are the staff conclusions and consensus here so far?![]()
Okay.Sorry I havent been active much, had some irl issues ive been dealing with. I will finish the rework as soon as i can
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What are the staff conclusions and consensus here so far?![]()
Okay.Sorry I havent been active much, had some irl issues ive been dealing with. I will finish the rework as soon as i can
I mean, sorta yeah, theyre two different states of matterThe page layout is solid enough but do we really need that many subcategories though? Like, I feel like Aerosols and Gases can just be one tier. Same with solids and semi-solids.
Since there is Sub-Atomic, probably should have Macro-Quantum and Quantum level too i guess
Can you think of a character that has intangibility of that type?
What are the staff conclusions and consensus here so far?![]()
Thats what im trying to figure out too, but no one is responding : /What are the staff conclusions and consensus here so far?![]()
What are the staff conclusions and consensus here so far?![]()
@Vietthai96 @DarkDragonMedeus @Planck69 @Damage3245 @FinePointThats what im trying to figure out too, but no one is responding : /
Would you be able to ping them again?
I forgot to comment on this, but I recall DontTalkDT sharing an article confirming fire as a plasma.Would we classify fire as a gas, a plasma, or an energy?
Gotcha, ive updated the sandboxI forgot to comment on this, but I recall DontTalkDT sharing an article confirming fire as a plasma.
My opinion was/is that we should essentially leave the nuance of NPI to the context of a particular case rather than making any rule which dictates whether one type implies another or so on.
AgreedMy opinion was/is that we should essentially leave the nuance of NPI to the context of a particular case rather than making any rule which dictates whether one type implies another or so on.
Assume you are still keeping this, i feel like this Type isn't even Intangiblity. Because Intangibility is literally passing through physical substance, so if character are still having solid physical characteristics and can be interacted by physical means then it is totally defeat the point of intangibilityType 1 (Solids):The user is able to become intangible by turning into a mass of solid matter or solid particles, such as sand, ice, paper, or plants, or even non-natural materials such as nanomachines or small creatures such as insects. Due to still being made of solid physical matter, characters with this type of Elemental Intangibility can still usually be damaged by physical means without the use of Non-Physical Interaction.
That makes sense to me.My opinion was/is that we should essentially leave the nuance of NPI to the context of a particular case rather than making any rule which dictates whether one type implies another or so on.
Thats the point, elemental intangibility is not true intangibility, I even made sure to specify this on the updated page. Its not intangibility in the sense that they move through matter, just that their physical forms are dispersed by attacks. Thats why its 'elemental'Assume you are still keeping this, i feel like this Type isn't even Intangiblity. Because Intangibility is literally passing through physical substance, so if character are still having solid physical characteristics and can be interacted by physical means then it is totally defeat the point of intangibility
We should not be trying to have less accurate standards in the name of 'saving space'. I included those types because they are not the same thing. This is a major reason why this revision was even made in the first place, because the original elemental intangibility page was far too nonspecific in regards to the types of elemental states that exist.Type 2 and Type 3 should be merged into a single Type (Semi Liquid to Liquid)
Type 4 Gas and 5 Aerosol should also be merged into a single type cause they are similar
This save space for the page
Technically they all fall under the 'quantum particles' category so i switched it to that and added quarksType 7 should be Matter which encompasses from Atomic to even Quantum
Hard no on this, shadow-based intangibility is an extremely prevalent power across fiction. Its immaterial in name alone, there is no such thing being nonexistent or abstract elementally as those are not elements.Type 9 should be removed. Immaterial encompasses a lot of thing that are completely lack material existence, from simply being incorporeal to even nonexistent, abstract
I think youre getting confused here, this is not dealing with incorporeality, abstraction, or nonexistence, this is purely physical intangibility. Those things are being revised in a separate thread after this.Physical Intangibility section is oke from a glance but again like the above, Immaterial should be removed as well.
DoneSpatial type could be changed into Dimensional, there are probably some character who can phase through temporal shifting or even spatio-temporal
Removed that outright, i'll deal with that in another threadMetaphysical should be changed into Immaterial, which will encompasses all true non-physical intangbility types, ranging from simply being incorporeal (soul, spirit, ghost stuff) to crazier thing like nonexistent physiology, abstract existence
Since this thread does not seem to progress anywhere, should we follow FinePoint's conclusion and close this thread?My opinion was/is that we should essentially leave the nuance of NPI to the context of a particular case rather than making any rule which dictates whether one type implies another or so on.
The thing is that would only apply to the different types of physical NPI, Elemental intangibility would still have a hierarchy, as would the hierarchy stuff that zeldris brought up for metaphysical intangibilitySince this thread does not seem to progress anywhere, should we follow FinePoint's conclusion and close this thread?![]()
Hhmm, i'm not exactly agree with it since they are mostly physical and get physically affected but whateverThats the point, elemental intangibility is not true intangibility, I even made sure to specify this on the updated page. Its not intangibility in the sense that they move through matter, just that their physical forms are dispersed by attacks. Thats why its 'elemental'
I already grouped them in a way that they are similar enough to be grouped, especially stuff like Gas and Aerosol are very similarWe should not be trying to have less accurate standards in the name of 'saving space'. I included those types because they are not the same thing.
Immaterial physical = non-physical, so it completely go against your definition of physical intangibility, your very category itselfI think youre getting confused here, this is not dealing with incorporeality, abstraction, or nonexistence, this is purely physical intangibility. Those things are being revised in a separate thread after this.
But the thing is similar =/= the same. An aerosol is something like a cloud of dust in the air, whereas a gas is the air itself. Aerosols are still particles suspended in the air, gas is not.I already grouped them in a way that they are similar enough to be grouped, especially stuff like Gas and Aerosol are very similar
Thats the thing though, once this is done i'll be organizing and revising all of the profiles that have intangibility so they are accurate.And it definitely not making thing less accurate, those issues on this site is mostly do not come from the P&A page, they are just guideline, the issues is how profile are indexed and how the justification of ability is wrote, no matter how "accurate" our page is, it is pointless if the profiles themselves aren't accurate
Okay, how would you categorize stuff like ghosts/spirits then? Things that lack physical matter but still exist?Immaterial physical = non-physical, so it completely go against your definition of physical intangibility, your very category itself
Physical Intangibility is you are still physical but can phase through things which is described by your other two types, Monecular and Dimensional. Immaterial mean you are, by definitionz your nature is a non-physical being
Just drop those stuff into other categories, like making a Non-Physical IntangibilityOkay, how would you categorize stuff like ghosts/spirits then? Things that lack physical matter but still exist?
...so just change 'immaterial' to 'non-physical'?Just drop those stuff into other categories, like making a Non-Physical Intangibility
DoneJust drop those stuff into other categories, like making a Non-Physical Intangibility
I will check later when i have time (hope), you still need to ask other staff opinion though, it isn't like my only vote allows you to applies the thread, this is site-wide revision, Admin vote is neededDone
Is this good to apply now?
I will check later when i have time (hope), you still need to ask other staff opinion though, it isn't like my only vote allows you to applies the thread, this is site-wide revision, Admin vote is needed
ImmaterialJust want to ask a quick question, what would illusions classify as?
So wait am i having it be immaterial intangibility or non-physical intangibility?Immaterial
Non-physicalSo wait am i having it be immaterial intangibility or non-physical intangibility?
Considering nobody is responding, I feel like i need to at this pointI don't think you need to bump this frequent. But overall, i think your current sandbox is oke