• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Well, Crimsonobu is a more well-established member and has not behaved badly previously as far as I am aware, so maybe banning them completely is too draconian? Let's wait and see what they have to say for themself. 🙏
I understand.


According to Gamin_Yoon23's comment, Allegxtions and Saint.K.Grass are the same person. Can you check the IP addresses of both?
 
I understand.


According to Gamin_Yoon23's comment, Allegxtions and Saint.K.Grass are the same person. Can you check the IP addresses of both?
While I’m unsure if they’re the same person their actions are very similar. I don’t think it’d hurt to run an assessment just to avoid the worst case scenario. My input doesn’t mean much but I do think it would be mandatory.
 
At first, he said that he was Crimsonobu. But then he said that he shared the account.


So I think he can access this account as well.
aw shucks. this is my last comment from this account. enjoy your time <3 . back to og crimsonobu (the owner of this account) . we arent the same person. alegations is a completely different person. ask anyone on discord 😭 . only 2 offenses for a ban? unfortuane

I understand.


According to Gamin_Yoon23's comment, Allegxtions and Saint.K.Grass are the same person. Can you check the IP addresses of both?
for clarification. i live in spain valencia. i dont belive allegations is even in europe

Maybe not. There were IP address overlaps long afterwards, including yesterday.


What do you have to say in your defence, Crimsonobu? 🙏
crimsonobu had this account before me. hes still active on here mainly on rezero. i come on for lookism. ill be leaving and hes gonna be the sole owner.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think both of them are behaving childish. Still, from what I can tell Saint appears to be the first person to do this and the one loosely implying threatening physical behaviour, a blatant escalation.
pardon. physical behavior? i never threatened anyone physically. yes i did act out of order and i pushed it to a point i shouldnt have but by no means have i threatened anyone. and the last comment i made to viott was a reference to a meme after he replied toa already days old message with passive agression.
 
pardon. physical behavior? i never threatened anyone physically. yes i did act out of order and i pushed it to a point i shouldnt have but by no means have i threatened anyone. and the last comment i made to viott was a reference to a meme after he replied toa already days old message with passive agression.
So much for your last comment from this account.

Yes, you did loosely imply physical threats. The suggestion about challenging someone physically followed by the When a Stranger Calls reference of the call coming from inside the house. These things do vaguely imply physical aggression. Not direct threats, but definitely loosely implied ones.
 
So much for your last comment from this account.

Yes, you did loosely imply physical threats. The suggestion about challenging someone physically followed by the When a Stranger Calls reference of the call coming from inside the house. These things do vaguely imply physical aggression. Not direct threats, but definitely loosely implied ones.
wait going face to face and physique for physique just means comparing them (who looks better/has a better physique) . if that's where the confusion lies. ? same with grade for grade and uni for uni. comparing grades+ university. there wasnt any loosely implied threats of physical violence, thats a clear misunderstanding. and the "sha boing boing" comment was a reference to a meme . its about someone being obsessed. which was related to viott replying to a 3 day old harmless message with aggression . a message that had nothing to do with the conversation which viott clearly used to just make a petty remark .where yes i admit i was being extremely unnecessarily aggressive which i do regret he had no reason to make that follow up remark and i dont belive the "shaboing boing" comment was anything to take seriously.

the call coming inside the house was to refer to his insults to my argument. he made a multiple assumptions and presuppositions while telling me that i was the one doing them. hence the call coming from inside the house or more accurately the pot calling the kettle black. another user just expressed the same remark as me interms of our argument points , (you can check that we have no relation) i made a fair criticsm of a blog he made and he kept ignoring just to asert the same presuppositions. "the cgm will decide" isnt an adequate response to most arguments ngl. while i did end it at my last remark he chose to continue it at a completely undrelated message
 
wait going face to face and physique for physique just means comparing them (who looks better/has a better physique) . if that's where the confusion lies. ? same with grade for grade and uni for uni. comparing grades+ university. there wasnt any loosely implied threats of physical violence, thats a clear misunderstanding. and the "sha boing boing" comment was a reference to a meme . its about someone being obsessed. which was related to viott replying to a 3 day old harmless message with aggression . a message that had nothing to do with the conversation which viott clearly used to just make a petty remark .where yes i admit i was being extremely unnecessarily aggressive which i do regret he had no reason to make that follow up remark and i dont belive the "shaboing boing" comment was anything to take seriously.

the call coming inside the house was to refer to his insults to my argument. he made a multiple assumptions and presuppositions while telling me that i was the one doing them. hence the call coming from inside the house or more accurately the pot calling the kettle black
Hm... That can be a possible interpretation of those comments. Still, there's undeniable aggression from you there. I believe both of you were being immature, no question.
 
Hm... That can be a possible interpretation of those comments. Still, there's undeniable aggression from you there. I believe both of you were being immature, no question.
i completely agree that i took it out of hand in the first place. but a permeant ban is a bit too harsh imo. if i were to ever come back id just stop interacting with him beyond giving one opinion message regarding a calc and leaving it at that. iv rarely if ever been aggressive towards any other member. maybe at worst pettam33 but me and him are friends so none of us take it seriously
 
whyd you edit the blatantly agressive comment to make yourself look better. i just referenced a meme viott thats all . im not the one who replied to a 3 day old (completely normal might i add) comment with agression.
I didn't edit my comment right away. I did it later after you got banned. And my comment was not aggressive. I just said that I didn't care about the feat you mentioned. In short, I wrote 'I don't care.' But later I thought it was childish and edited it again.

Also, the main reason Antvasima permanently banned you is that you used a disgusting word twice. That's unacceptable.
 
Last edited:
I didn't edit my comment right away. I did it later after you got banned. And my comment was not aggressive. I just said that I didn't care about the feat you mentioned. In short, I wrote 'I don't care.' But later I thought it was childish and edited it again.

Also, the main reason Antvasima permanently banned you is that you used a disgusting word twice. That's unacceptable.
disgusting word that could be considered legitametly offensive such as :
if you mean "********" then i find you being offended by something so irrelevant funny. but it is what it is. i do apologize for being that aggressive in the first place over a calc argument
 
This user has been making vandalisms for these pages, currently reversing the edits they've made. Also please lock Vader's page on top of that for blatant reasons.

Thanks for the help. Here is where these go though (:
 
honest to god i didnt even know it was considered a slur . we use it in spain as "subnormal/subhumano" pretty normally. if it is then my bad. ill take the punishment as is
Not a slur per se. But it's considered hate speech as you are literally dehumanizing someone. And same, it's part of normal vocabulary in my country too
 
I want the IP addresses of Saint.K.Grass and Lichgod2 to be checked.


Because after Saint.K.Grass got banned, this guy showed up and started saying the exact same things. That’s why I’m suspicious.
can you check atleast the creation date. not everyone who agrees with me will be an alt. and again this is just desperate on your end. not me tho so feel free to check
 
Not a slur per se. But it's considered hate speech as you are literally dehumanizing someone. And same, it's part of normal vocabulary in my country too
honestly i dont find it Perma ban worthy but ill wait to see if everyone else changes their mind about it. especially since its normalized in spain
 
can you check atleast the creation date. not everyone who agrees with me will be an alt. and again this is just desperate on your end. not me tho so feel free to check
This is not enough, because he(you) might have created an account before.

Checking the IP address will not be a problem.

Also, the staff asked you to change the password and promise never to log in again. When will you do this?
 
When you look at Lichgod2's comment history, there's very little to no activity until today. It's definitely the same dude lol.
ok wait like legit PLEASE CHECK. cuz on GOD that dude is not me lmao. im curioius about the timing now,dont ban some random
 
This is not enough, because he(you) might have created an account before.

Checking the IP address will not be a problem.

Also, the staff asked you to change the password and promise never to log in again. When will you do this?
the second i prove that im not one of those randoms. + i belive a permenant ban is unfair thus i want to talk about it more
go ahead and check just to be safe. im not allegations or legit any of those guys. dudes account is from 2022 i havent eevn been here for half that time

so i was just talking to myself here?
 
Last edited:
i dont know whats going on but apparently the user @AgonistDisorder is a sock of Marshadow/Wankbreaker
I second(?) this report, though apparently even staff members suspect or possibly know about this? I asked in the thread if this whole Marshadow thing was a bit or real, with no response. IDK if there's been a special exception made, some kind of staff discussion ongoing, a lack of understanding of what Marshadow/Wankbreaker's punishment was or if this is just an elaborate joke and @AgonistDisorder and everyone else in the thread are having a little giggle.
 
disgusting word that could be considered legitametly offensive such as :
if you mean "********" then i find you being offended by something so irrelevant funny. but it is what it is. i do apologize for being that aggressive in the first place over a calc argument
I don’t exactly understand what you mean by just putting asterisks.
 
I actually do think the word in question is a tricky matter, with context being important. Many works of fiction use the word to refer to monsters after all. Note that such cases are usually talking very literally about inhuman monsters though, not any kind of people. Using it to refer to another person is a different context.
 
I actually do think the word in question is a tricky matter, with context being important. Many works of fiction use the word to refer to monsters after all. Note that such cases are usually talking very literally about inhuman monsters though, not any kind of people. Using it to refer to another person is a different context.
It has roots in Nazism. 🙏
 
Anyway, maybe the permanent ban for Saint was exaggerated, but Crimsonobu needs to change their password and stop sharing accounts with others, if they actually are two different people, which is difficult for us to properly verify. 🙏
 
Anyway, maybe the permanent ban for Saint was exaggerated, but Crimsonobu needs to change their password and stop sharing accounts with others, if they actually are two different people, which is difficult for us to properly verify. 🙏
Can we really trust him? Because he can log into the account whenever he wants.
 
I do not know. I will ask AKM to help out here. 🙏
 
Back
Top