Here's my summary
Premise
---------
Imaginary space was originally L1-A accepted as per
this thread
But it was later downgraded due to the misconception of Imaginary tree growing through 11D sea of quanta in
this thread.
Current thread
---------------
I have proved that imaginary tree growing through sea of quanta is actually a localization error.
En localized scan that caused the downgrade
original CN scan
Anyone can clearly see that this is a misunderstanding. So we now know that the imaginary tree doesn't grow through 11D sea of quanta. But how is that makes Imaginary space L 1A, you might ask. This is a bit confusing since the terms are loosely used in different contexts.
The Imaginary Tree has two parts. One is real space where MWI happens and the other is imaginary space.
Imaginary sigularity exists in imaginary space as a fixed point, dimensionless and existing in all dimensions. This is what was argued in L1-A upgrade thread.
Since the tree no longer grew through 11D SoQ, downgrade thread becomes invalid and making imaginary space L1-A again.
What're the current problems discussed here?
--------------------------------------------------
1. Imaginary space is delimited to 11D if it's inside the tree and the tree is in rivalry with the sea.
Ans : As I've explained
here, the tree's rivalry with the sea is about the process of leaf worlds falling into the sea and it's happening on real space level without including the imaginary space. Heck, the whole goal of project stigmata is to elavate humanity into imaginary space so that honkai won't destroy us.
2. Chaos is framed into space time
Ans : The text here literally said "Unconstrained by space-time". (But we are waiting TL request to be done to get better conclusion)
You guys can tell me to list more problems if I didn't address them but that's all I can think so far.
Current mods' evaluation:
@Reiner04 seems to agree with 1-A yog sothoth and waiting the consensus to be reached about Low 1-A matter.
@Vietthai96 doesn't say anything about 1-A yog sothoth but seems to disagree with Low 1-A.