I never said you don’t know what you’re talking about in general. I said you’re not up to date on the forum’s current standards, which is a completely different thing. Staff status from the past doesn’t automatically reflect current accepted methodology, especially on a wiki that revises its rules regularly.
www.popularmechanics.com
You implied it in your reply.
It just... Isn't, that goes against our principles.
Agreed. This thread needs to chill. Also, trying to tackle multiple calcs at once isn't very productive.
You know this from experience don’t you? LOL
Yeah I have my problems with the jogo earthquake but this isnt really one of them
I brought this up before but didn't the calc use different dust? The calc just shouldn't be done through dust since it requires ignoring the primary used material. Alternatively though the metal within the area should be used instead which is 411618212 kg steel.
It uses coal dust because its directly stated sukuna changes the particles into thermobaric fuel.
The link you presented shows it occurring from explosive spalling from 600 degrees where the water inside the concrete turns into steam. The steam expands so much that the volume of the concrete cannot contain it and it effectively "blows up" because it literally cannot fit. It's like filling a balloon with so much water that it explodes on it's own. That doesn't mean the concrete explodes from fire, that's a secondary effect from water that is not even close to what Fuga has shown here.Watch Concrete Blow Up When Heated (and See Why It Happens)
The new research could result in more fire-safe concrete.
Dude thinks I make threads with information pulled out of my booty hole.
No, you just strawmanned me. Please read what I'm saying next time.
Which principles? Not even cgm and staff, who establish these principles for calcing in the first place, are agreeing with you lmfao
Heat is uneven, some parts would explode whilst some wouldn't, because again, heat is inconsistent. This doesn't debunk what I've said.
Vaporised the area.
Yeah ik, but I'm not sure if coal dust is the best for the calc. The metal dust is there, it is combustible, think it makes more sense the metal scattered combusted and caused the matted concrete to catch on fire.
Where did all the steam come from then?
There's a difference between smoke and steam.
Can kinda just search it up and see for yourself.
Well yeah I agree. I'm not saying the area (concrete) was vaped, the water was though. I just misread your comment I think?
Is this it?Is this it?Mayfair Lightweight Concrete Outdoor 50,000 BTU Circular Fire Pit (No Tank Holder), Light Gray - Walmart.com
Buy Mayfair Lightweight Concrete Outdoor 50,000 BTU Circular Fire Pit (No Tank Holder), Light Gray at Walmart.comwww.walmart.com
Or this?Amazon.com : Elementi Manhattan Concrete Fire Pit 36" x 36" Outdoor Patio Firepit Includes Lava Rocks Modern Fire Pits & Outdoor Fireplaces for Garden, Deck, Indoor & Outdoor Heating : Patio, Lawn & Garden
Amazon.com : Elementi Manhattan Concrete Fire Pit 36" x 36" Outdoor Patio Firepit Includes Lava Rocks Modern Fire Pits & Outdoor Fireplaces for Garden, Deck, Indoor & Outdoor Heating : Patio, Lawn & Gardenwww.amazon.com
bro what.
JJK takes place in 2018.
Literally any building that goes through extreme temperatures. Look at the photos in the links, they're clearly from the 2010's and 2020's.
Guesswork then, good to know!
Self-evident.
Guesswork. If you do not know, and are merely guessing the timeframe, then it is guesswork.
I think so.
Hot enough to produce steam wherever he goes.
Bro's going on a training arc with druv the yuta victim
In this case, all of the buildings were f*cking gone after the attack lmfao. Plus you're making a circular reasoning here.
It's textbook vapourisation mec, at least according to the very principles you claim you appeal to.
Did you forget the part where the centre of the vapourising attack (aka Fuga) sublimates concrete? There wouldn't be any solid for the steam to pop like popcorn at that point thus the way you posit concrete to explode wouldn't apply here. But it still explodes. Why? The scientist narrator explains why; you still didn't posit a plausible explanation for why the scientist would be wrong here (and the reason u said why was already debunked)
Yes, do it please
You can't say debunk the thread when half of it is already being talked about in other threads, or have already been recalced (Uraume calc). The mech shit was killed last month and just won't be used. The verse page is ass rn so not your fault you didn't read five different threads going over some of this. The Sukuna shit is the only thing with some merit. Should make a thread tackling that in depth.
