• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Ok do you have any proof of him lying? He showed you the definition yet here you are being unjustifiably aggressive.
Sissy (derived from sister), often cissy,[1] also sissy baby, sissy boy, sissy man, sissy pants, etc., is a pejorative term for a boy or man who does not demonstrate masculine traits, is effeminate and shows possible signs of fragility. Generally, sissy implies a lack of courage, strength, athleticism, coordination, testosterone, male libido, and stoicism. A man might also be considered a sissy for being interested in stereotypically feminine hobbies or employment (e.g., being fond of fashion), displaying effeminate behavior, being unathletic or being homosexual.[2]
 
This is uncalled for. Someone saying something you disagree with doesn't mean they're lying. They could be misinformed, or have a different interpretation, or maybe you're the one who is just wrong.
Damage, weren't you the guy desperate to keep the trans label to be put in the trans characters on this wiki? Why should I take you seriously.
And not, I'm not in the wrong here, because the word was objectively used as a homophobic insult, trying to deny that is lying
 
Also, I don't mind if we apply a permanent ban for Sean.

I don't think that most people associate it with that context, or at least neither I nor the Oxford dictionary do. 🙏

View attachment 939
Honestly, some people might take even a small slip up way too Personally, so i already gave them a Heads up earlier, as a precaution.
 
Damage, weren't you the guy desperate to keep the trans label to be put in the trans characters on this wiki?
Why should I take you seriously.
And not, I'm not in the wrong here, because the word was objectively used as a homophobic insult, trying to deny that is lying
What is this Ad Hominem attack? What relevance is that to what I've told you in my above post?
 
It's simple, I can't take your argument seriously, specially when you're defending blatant lies
How about this; if you keep derailing the Rule Violation Reports thread then I will have to thread-ban you for derailing. Does that work?

To be clear; any more posts following this accusing Antvasima or other users of lying when it has nothing to do with the RVR thread will be deleted.
 
@ShakeResounding is a longtime member with a good track record as far as I am aware. I don't deny that he was being unnecessarily rude, but I extremely strongly doubt that he intended to use any type of bigotry towards homosexuals, especially as the "sissy" word is usually associated with simply meaning oversensitivity according to the dictionary, and don't bigots use the f-word for when they want to be bigoted in this area anyway?

Also, I have a mental condition that makes me into too much of an unfiltered blabbermouth/chronically honest, so it is very hard for me to deliberately lie, which should be blatantly obvious for those who have gotten to know me for a prolonged time. 🙏
 
Yes. I am inclined to extend Sean's ban ban to permanent if those comments represent his general attitude in our community and elsewhere. Also, don't we make exceptions for actual severe hate-speech, even if it is made outside of our community? 🙏
I also don't mind us going for permanent btw
 
"Sissy" is NOT homophobic. Though, I can understand why some people interpret as transphobic (That might be the proper word Zyurtinder13 was looking for). However, it's originally just a slang word for coward or wimp. And modern day standards, it's typically a cisgendered who is into feminization lifestyle or dominance and submission type of relationship. And they are NOT intended to be mixed up with transgender women.

And yeah, ShakeResounding is long running and well behaved user, so I highly doubt he meant anything that bad from it. Not to mention, Antvasima openly states all the time that he basically cannot intentionally lie; and at worst, if he says something untrue, it is either accidental or he misunderstood details and there was no deceptive intent. Which according to people who are professional lie detectors, it wouldn't classify as lying in that case.

Edit: Commenting on the Sean situation, in hindsight, the Anti-Semitic statement is a huge red flag and could fall under extreme hate speech, but I think trolling was more so his intent rather than specific targeting. That being said, the fact that it was recent and he is still just pure hostile, toxic, and expressive of his total lack of self control. All characters that lead to his ban being extended to permanent back in 2021 only to have it appealed in 2024, this tells me that Sean Pazdera is the type of person who refuses to grow or change no matter what. And he keeps trying to excuse himself with statements delusional at best and dishonest at worse. Combined the fact that he technically already abused his final chance in general and technically was realistically supposed to be permabanned already, I am in favor of reinstating his permanent ban with no chance to appeal. And he'll need to put on the same list as ZaStando, Misako Mikoto, Jonathan Lighter, ect and others for all these reasons.
 
Last edited:
Accusing Ant and Damage of ill intent isn't reasonable, and people often use the insult "sissy" to refer to anyone they consider too soft. That report strikes me as trying to punish someone for opposing them and then attacking staff for not going along with the report. That behaviour is literally worse than what they're reporting.

On the other issue, I'd comment on Sean's statements in those screenshots, but I don't think anything I can say would tell it better than just reading the screenshots. Off-site behaviour is obviously treated differently, and context is impossible to attain from such small images, but those comments seem to indicate a truly poisonous attitude.
 
Last edited:
Using that as your argument is dumb Ant, the insult was created as a homophobic one and it's used 99% of the time as a homophobic insult, stop lying dude
Man, I live in the Deep South (generally about the most bigoted area you can go to in America), and I have never once heard anyone say “sissy” in a homophobic way; only ever to refer to someone being a wuss or wimp. If it was actually used “99% of the time” as one, believe me, I’d have heard it. Even if it may have started as one (still don’t know if it has or not), it doesn’t mean the same thing anymore, so you can’t punish someone for saying it.

Also, don’t baselessly accuse people of lying, especially not Ant.
 
Edit: I should also mention this behavior of Sean's is even directed toward other Pokemon supporters on this site like StrymULTRA.
Just so the topic of Sean doesn't get drowned, he did say shit like this towards me in the past:
Wanking Arceus is all you're known for.
Don't feel like it. Digimon is my enemy, not Pokemon. I'll let you believe what you want if your wank gets Arceus to 1-A.
So yeah... he definitely argues out of agenda, as long as he gets what he wants, he'll run with it as long as his idea of being "Digimon's #1 enemy" or whatever nonsense he thinks to be in his head, even if he doesn't agree with it.

I agree that being dishonest isn't a rule violation per-se, but this gives more context on the guy overall.
 
Considering that my name has been brought up... no.

The real context of him being banned from that Discord is him starting to derail genuine discussions about Pokémon scalings by bringing out his usual nonsense about his crusade against other monster franchises, other than him starting to attack me out of the blue just because I was talking about YGO in a non-derogatory way, but I disgress (could bring some evidence about that if y'all want, I just can't do that coz I'm pretty busy).

HOWEVER, he did say some pretty messed up stuff on his latest comments (made yesterday, mind you) on that Pokémon vs Digimon video he's been spamming since a decade:
dtEabqT.png

Up to y'all what should be done from this.
Sorry for flooding this, but I'd like to give a quick update on the matter: Sean has deleted the comments in question, implying guilt.

But let's not pretend he didn't say stuff like this too (3 weeks and 1 month ago respectively):
Bhp4YQ9.png

WinddNB.png
 
Unnecessary aggression for no valid reason coupled with unneeded homophobic insult
Responding to this because I am at the center of the report. If it's deemed unneeded, I don't mine it being deleted.

I didn't say that with the intent of it being a homophobic attack on you. I don't even know you beyond seeing you constantly complain and act aggressive when people discuss an opinion you don't like. I used "sissy" in the sense that you're overtly sensitive. Regardless, I'll be sure to be more cautious about my language for you to try and avoid being painted as a bigot.

Sorry to the staff for getting to this late, I am currently working.
 
Anyway, what official text justification should we state for extending Sean's ban time to permanent in our forum and wiki? "Ongoing toxicity, as well as hate-speech against Digimon fans and Jews in general, and used up his final chances."? Or should we add anything more than that? 🙏
 
Not to mention, Antvasima openly states all the time that he basically cannot intentionally lie; and at worst, if he says something untrue, it is either accidental or he misunderstood details and there was no deceptive intent. Which according to people who are professional lie detectors, it wouldn't classify as lying in that case.
Well, I can say that the sky is green, but given my unfiltered sincere mindset, lying doesn't come naturally for me. However, that can also mean that I blurt out things that are not well-considered sometimes, and I later realise are untrue, so it isn't entirely uncomplicated. 🙏
 
Anyway, what official text justification should we state for extending Sean's ban time to permanent in our forum and wiki? "Ongoing toxicity, as well as hate-speech against Digimon fans and Jews in general, and used up his final chances."? Or should we add anything more than that? 🙏
I'd say something on the likes of:
Persistent cases of toxicity both on-site and off-site, with the latter instances including serious anti-semitic claims and explicit wishes of death against the Digimon fanbase, other than also having broken all of the chances that were given to him across the last years.
 
I shortened it down to the following. 🙏

"Ongoing toxicity both on-site and off-site, with the latter instances including serious antisemitism and wishes of death against the Digimon fanbase, and also used up the chances that were given to him over the years."
 
Last edited:
I shortened it dow to the following. 🙏

"Ongoing toxicity both on-site and off-site, with the latter instances including serious antisemitism and wishes of death against the Digimon fanbase, and also used up the chances that were given to him over the years."
Seems fine.

As for 'sissy', in regards to gay people, I hear it far more often as a self-applied fetish term than any kind of insult. Outside of that it's almost always just a synonym for coward/weak, even if the origins of such are questionable.

Historically, it did used to be a popular insult for men perceived as non-masculine in any way, which often included being gay or trans. I only really hear that use still from old conservative people. The f-slur is indeed the most popular choice among modern bigots, though particularly with the youth I've noticed.

Regardless, when a word has so many meanings, you must look at context, and the context here shows no clear signs of homophobia nor transphobia.
 
Last edited:
There's something interesting about these two cases being looked at simultaneously, because it allows for contrast. In the "sissy" case, it's literally just a vague word with little meaning being applied to someone deemed too easily upset. In the Sean case, those comments literally qualify as calls for violence and an endorsement of racial violence, despite no derogatory terms being used.

The actual attitudes being expressed tend to be the key, because even derogatory terms are only used to convey those attitudes.
 
I must ask, are we sure those screenshots are real? They look real, but can they be verified?
I’m not part of this, but the “Pokémon fans are as bad as Jews” one was actually real, not sure if the comments are still up but I did see it when I clicked newest on the Pokémon VS Digimon death battle
 
Sean has quite a lot of arguments for why he thinks a permanent ban is unfair in the thread linked below. I would appreciate if other staff members read and evaluate them. 🙏

Reading that, I'll just say this:
Those Youtube comments were just to let off some steam after getting banned, by the way. They're gone now.
[...]
Gonna be honest though, those last comments did cross the line. I was basically seeing red because I just learned that I had just been cut off from VSBW for the next 52 weeks. If I knew that Strym would post it here, I obviously wouldn't have done it.
This implies he isn't sorry for doing these comments, it only says that... he's sorry for being caught. He's not remotely remorseful for using Jews as an unironic insult in a fit of rage lmfao, you don't do these things on accident.
From the moment I discovered the problem, the things I did post in the Death Battle thread were void of any argument and were often just stuff like this.
Sean became a lolcow atp, and he was keeping to post random years/months long Reddit posts for no reason besides his Digimon obsession. Plus let's not pretend that his usual routine isn't to purposely give a hot take to start arguments, then give half-assed answers to make people angrier (examples here or here, though I could find more if I digged harder). So no, it's just people being rightfully fed up with his bullshit.
I was immensely supportive in the Pokemon VS community, even in the face of criticism (read from there onwards)
Literally just another "I am le big Pokémon verse marthyr!!!", which another reason why none takes him seriously here or everywhere else. He even suggested to make more profiles instead of just focusing on improving the already existing ones, when his average profile is shit like this or this.
Even during a mental break and what I perceived to be a betrayal on Strym's part, I did not take it out on him and even thanked someone else for wanting to help me.
Literally none is talking about a betrayal lmfao. @Bobsican (an actual major Pokémon supporter) was in the thread too and nowhere he was reacting like that, but gave genuine arguments and was civil all the time. It's fully Sean's fault here from start to finish for derailing the thread with his boo-hoos.
I have shown clear intent to improve myself and follow the rules.
Being purposely obnoxious in order to start arguments and flames is a rule violation.
It seems like every time I do something nice, it gets ignored, but every time I so much as raise my voice it's proof that I never changed and that I'm back to my old ways.
Because it is. Remember the old violation that caused his first ban for a year?

He still is doing that, starting arguments to create fights against people who he hates. I do not buy that "I didn't know that people hated me that much." for a second, he does this on purpose way too many times to be oblivious.
 
I'm in full agreement with StrymULTRA and I really think it is time to move on from the drama. I also really don't want a repeat of ZaStando situation where he kept constantly begging staff members on their wall to lift his ban. Or where it was constantly repeated on the RVR every 6 months.
 
Sean has quite a lot of arguments for why he thinks a permanent ban is unfair in the thread linked below. I would appreciate if other staff members read and evaluate them. 🙏

Were it 'just' these offsite antisemitic death wishes, and he were otherwise a saint on our forum, I could consider overlooking it as 'outside our purview'.

But in combination with the constant issues surrounding him here, it really just paints him as a troll who's repeatedly wasting our time. I don't get any indication of serious regret from their pleas hinging on bureaucracy rather than accountability and making amends.
 
Being purposely obnoxious in order to start arguments and flames is a rule violation.

Because it is. Remember the old violation that caused his first ban for a year?

He still is doing that, starting arguments to create fights against people who he hates. I do not buy that "I didn't know that people hated me that much." for a second, he does this on purpose way too many times to be oblivious.

Yes, this was something I noticed in Sean's feud with Jinx and a big part of why I supported Jinx even while Jinx was the one arguing with me. I noticed Sean had a habit of stirring Jinx up, apologising to staff right after, then going quiet while Jinx argued with the staff in the resulting argument Sean had just stirred up. I've dealt with people who did that, so I could tell it was deliberate. It lines up exactly with what's described in those screenshots.
 
Last edited:
I know I'm not staff,
but wasn't Sean supposed to be unable to appeal? Or was that only for the 1-year ban?
Well, the issue was still fresh, and I needed help with evaluating his arguments, as I am not sufficiently well-informed about the full circumstances, but it seems like Sean will stay banned here permanently, yes. 🙏
 
@Azertyhuuh is once again insulting in a CRT, even tho he already had over 3 warnings, this is a recurrent issue because he does it EVERY SINGLE TIME he talks on a crt, can we do something about it?

 
Back
Top