• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

One-Punch Man: Updated Supercontinent Size

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
23,369
Reaction score
21,102
I believe it's fair to scale Boros to attack his ship, as he can cause more damage than bullets, especially with MB.
 
I agree
I agree with this.

Boros will be scaling far higher than individual bullets.
The total bombardment is 6-A+, above the value of the meteor and Boros causes more damage than that.
 
Last edited:
I agree

The total bombardment is 6-A+, above the value of the meteor and Boros causes more damage than that.
When was the ship ever hit by its own full bombardment so its damage could be compared?
 
Boros would only scale over a single bullet unfortunately. Multiplying by 30 would be calc stacking.
Even if the sum of 30 or 36 bullets worked, it would still be less than the value of the meteor, albeit by a small margin.

It's a shame it wasn't a full-scale bombardment... I believe there haven't been any other instances of the ship attacking then, right?
 
If it's just replacing the existing calculation and the new calculation is accepted, this should be fine.
 
Btw, i'm just reminding it since it might be misunderstood.
Meteor Destroys Z-City = 980.27577 Teratons | 6-A Continent Level

Spaceship destroys A-City = 3.152 Petatons | 6-A Continent Level+

1 bullet = 23.879 Teratons | 6-B Country Level
We scale the Ship's entire attack above the Meteor, not to City-A's as we don't accept that it destroyed the entire region of City-A.

So in the profiles, it'll be 7.42633159 Teratons from 980.27577/132 like how it was accepted in the previous thread. Still 6-B but almost baseline :d

(There is no problem with the calc though, as this is something decided in the thread rather than calc related issue.)
 
Why is it scaled that way again? The ship's profile doesn't explain how exactly its power is scaling from the meteor.

Plus it's stated several times that it destroyed A-City, am I missing something here?
The destruction of A-City doesn't line up with the count number of projectiles we see from the ship; trying to divide its destruction among the individual bullets doesn't work especially when we look at the amount of damage that the individual shells do.

It was proposed that it scales above the destruction caused by the meteor for some reason, to do with it being percieved as the potential God-level threat while the Meteor wasn't, but I disagreed with that when it originally came up.
 
It was proposed that it scales above the destruction caused by the meteor for some reason, to do with it being percieved as the potential God-level threat while the Meteor wasn't, but I disagreed with that when it originally came up.
Okay, the profile should at least reflect that logic then, especially when so many characters are scaling from that profile. @Kachon123

@Boll8011 Would you mind changing your calc so the power of 1 bullet is coming from Z-City's destruction and not A-City's destruction?
 
Okay, the profile should at least reflect that logic then, especially when so many characters are scaling from that profile. @Kachon123

@Boll8011 Would you mind changing your calc so the power of 1 bullet is coming from Z-City's destruction and not A-City's destruction?
I'm a little confused by your question. Could you please be more specific? (I'm not very good at English.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top