I don't remember, no. Can you recall which episode this occurred in, or are you confusing it with the conclusion of the story arc, where Future Trunks uses his Time Machine to rewrite the history of his future and Whis accompanies them to inform the future gods of Zamasu's evil?
Whis later traveled to the timeline that Beerus' erasure of Zamasu had created. I forget the manga chapter but it's the one where he flies off to another timeline (often used to argue immeasurable speed Whis)
Your statement isn’t entirely correct. You are overlooking some important details in Dragon Ball. Yes, any event or decision you make creates many possible futures, and it’s not limited to time travel or changing the past. Even the decisions you make from time to time generate multiple possible futures. Even if you say “I am here,” the universe around you will manifest to create many parallel worlds, and this is confirmed in Dragon Ball here ↓
Source: https://en.dragon-ball-official.com/
It is relevant to the topic. The matter has already been approved. A clash between two Gods of Destruction causes the annihilation of both universes, and this includes a portion of the Neutral Zone located between the two universes. This means the destruction of a small five-dimensional structure. I stated that destroying a small five-dimensional structure is a 2-A feat, because even the smallest five-dimensional part contains an uncountably infinite number of four-dimensional structures within it. That is all—and this is only one part of the topic.
I only lurk here to spy on everyone, but this statement is wrong. An uncountable infinite number of 4D spaces is Low 1-C
You're talking about a countable infinite number of 4D structures, which can only occur if Beerus and Champa temporally erased a partial amount of the space-time of the entire Neutral Zone.
THe arguement they are using differ from the arguement u are proposing mid ways that can derail the actual arguement that needs to be evaluated. If person A has X arguement to prove Tier 1 then he has all rights for his X arguement to be properly evaluated in his own thread. If some other person has Y arguement different from the person A then he should create his own thread (after 26-27 days now) to get it evaluated, rather than derailing person A thread with it.
Delete.
Lol hell no. Jiren stays a 2-C fodder while Zeno gets 1-C.
Too bad Lavender solos him tho.
Buuhan lowkey candy beams GG
True, and Hit dura negs and time haxxed Zeno.
He doesn't, but he still can't be beaten by him thanks to the unlisted rules =P
His EE isn't affected by it except for now having 1-C potency which has nothing to do with layers though.
I agree delete it
Right.
Reiner stealing my pfp again
So, yes, I'm correct. You were talking about the end of the story arc.
Right, so he informs the Beerus of that arc of Zamasu, which would result in that Beerus wiping Zamasu out too, which means a new timeline should also technically be created the same way Trunks' return causing Beerus to wipe present Zamasu is what caused the former timeline to exist, but that wasn't even a concern for either Whis or Beerus or anyone standing there, even though it's essentially the same as what Trunks did. Point is, the statement that only time travel creates parallel worlds is demonstrably false within the series and it is, at best, simply inconsistent and usually just a plot device.
It was mentioned in Dragon Ball that time travel or changing the past is not the only way to create parallel worlds. Even decisions made from time to time create parallel worlds as well. For example, even if you say “I am here,” the universe around you manifests and creates parallel worlds. Dragon Ball follows a Type 3 multiverse theory, involving quantum mechanics, and the Bulma notebook shows this. The work deliberately displays this notebook on-screen so that viewers can understand the type of universe and what happens within it, as shown in the notebook ↓
Are there scans for any of these?
