- 164
- 125
Proof?“Dimensional” here referring to curled ones.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Proof?“Dimensional” here referring to curled ones.
The anchor’s having everything to do with SoQ’s compactified dimensions…???Proof?
I’m not even sure what the contention is. “Originally” is as much an anti-feat as everything elseI mean, if it was a knot and she cut it, it's logical it's something else afterward
if they become straight, it's fine, trustThe anchor’s having everything to do with SoQ’s compactified dimensions…???
I’m not even sure what the contention is. “Originally” is as much an anti-feat as everything else
I heard you're strong.![]()
2-C is Dragonball's Turf ngl
Can't wait for this peak matchup to spawn oneday
Except for the fact that the dimensions are not treated as compactified, and, even if they were, they are still treated as higher planes that see the lower as fiction, so… I guess we shouldn’t be surprised when a soft sci-fi verse doesn’t play by very theoretical science rules all the time.The anchor’s having everything to do with SoQ’s compactified dimensions…???
Delete all non Hoyoverse content FRADamn this site is only active when its about Hoyoverse related stuff
![]()
Ok, so I believe the Honkai fandom had their fun and stuff with the recent L1A upgrade.
Unfortunately for them though, this gave me time to ruminate on further scaling. Particularly regarding the context of certain concepts within the verse, as I, self-admittedly, am a total Hi3 noob.
And as a result of this, I’ve come to the conclusion that this verse... is hot ass.
Exhibit A
{Sea of Quanta}
I'd like to begin this with the words of our good friend, Vietthai:
Now, why is this relevant? Well, because it ties into general lore about Honkai which is that the Imaginary Tree is equal, is born from, and literally grows through the Sea of Quanta. The same Imaginary Tree, which for all intents and purposes, was upgraded to Low 1-A in the previous CRT.
The reason then, why this is particularly damming, is the issue that the Sea of Quanta is 11-dimensional:
![]()
And I don't believe I am required to explain why something Low 1-A being not only equal to, but also born from an 11D thing, isn't an immediate disqualifier.
Now, I can already hear someone saying:
And to that, I can simply present this rather recent explanation of the SoQ; an explanation, which directly identifies the Sea as the Bathtub:
- But Nova, that scan says "Ether Bathtub", not "Sea of Quanta."
Not that, mind you, the scans already present in the cosmology page didn't functionally say the same thing; they just conflated the terms for different things out of nowhere.
And another thing I might hear is in relation to Imaginary and Real Space:
Issue is, that just as of recently in 3.7, we have attained this statement:
- Well, the cosmos is called the Imaginary Tree, so it must mean that the Tree only extends to the physical universe, and not Imaginary Space (what is Low 1-A here.)
![]()
For the uninitiated, this conversation is happening within Path Space, aka Imaginary Space. And in this same Path Space, Cyrene clearly stating "Cosmos's real Space-Time", implies that the "Cosmos", or the Imaginary Tree, contains both Imaginary and Real Space. Which is to say, that the Imaginary Tree itself, as the "composite whole", is Low 1-A--subsuming both Real and Imaginary Space.
Other proof for it can be stuff like this (singularity here referring to main proponents of the Low 1-A Imaginary Space scale), or for other stuff like this:
Which clearly state the source of Imaginary Energy is the Trunk. A role, which is the equivalent of Imaginary Space.
So what's the conclusion? Well, the Imaginary Tree should go down from Low 1-A, to the same tier which Sea of Quanta resides in.
Which, speaking off... hehe.
Exhibit BI will present merely these 3 scans:
{Sea of Quanta 2.0: Compactification}
![]()
![]()
![]()
Now, if you've read them, then you should hopefully be clear on the mechanics behind how the Bubble Worlds are formed; in that, the various membranes of the Sea of Quanta, by having a distance small enough so that the very membranes (i.e dimensions) that make them up, overlap within each other, creating a 4-dimensional space.
Which is to say: the spatial dimensions of the Sea of Quanta are compactified, or in other words, too small to qualify for tiering.
And if you'll notice in the cosmology blog, you'll realize that this description is consistent every time it is mentioned (I mean, "tied like a knot"? Come on.) Heck, the verse literally affirms, not just M-Theory, but particularly the most popular version of it: string theory. Which is compactified.
In response to this fact, I had been mentioned by the verse-supporters this. In that, the dimensions, even if compacted, would qualify for size since they are infinite.
Well, three problems:
And even if they were actually talking about size, and even if they were truly infinite; they still wouldn't work here. For this, I'd rather just use the words of @BestMGQScalerEver:
- The scans refer to the number of dimensions, not their size.
- This would contradict the earlier statements about SoQ.
- Considering that the verse isn't High 1-B right now, I can accurately assume that there's a very good reason why these scans are untrustworthy. (Which I can expect is to do with the usage of the verb "can be")
So then, what does this leave us? Well, this. In here, although there is little to see--sort of clarifies an R>F relationship between at least 1 single higher dimension, which might be applicable for +1D.
ConclusionSo with all that's been said, I propose that the entire verse is downgraded from already-shaky Possibly Low 1-A down to the measly tier of 2-C (for containing SoQ and IT as definitive and distinct universes), or depending on how we treat the last Welt scan, even Low 1-C. (Should be mentioned, that if Tier 2 is to be the majority-decided conclusion here, the exact number of universes can be argued and debated [preferably in a second]. I just gave the bare-minimum tier possible for the verse.]
Votes:
@Planck69 (Agree for compactification; waiting for Low 1-A)
gay dimensions waowif they become straight, it's fine, trust
If dimensions can be compactified by getting close to each other, that’s an anti-feat. You can’t just say “oh they’re infinite when they’re straightened out” or whatever. An anti-feat is an anti-feat. That’s just how dimensions work.Except for the fact that the dimensions are not treated as compactified, and, even if they were, they are still treated as higher planes that see the lower as fiction, so… I guess we shouldn’t be surprised when a soft sci-fi verse doesn’t play by very theoretical science rules all the time.
Paths = Path Energy = Imaginary Energy. They’re the same thing. Masterless Imaginary Energy is Path Energy before an Aeon takes over.Can you provide me with a scan saying that Path space = Imaginary space?
The same Imaginary Tree that’s also compacted lol?I also want to add that Durandal only being able to go to Imaginary Tree because she is fused with extra dimensions where these dimensions being the dimensions of the bubble world from Durandal Visual Novel which can be up to 11 Dimensional. Bubble world having extra dimensions already mean that some part of Ironmask explanation is still correct like how Bubble worlds can inherit up to 11D from Ether bathtub. It's crazy to throw away all past explanations just because one things is later shown otherwise (something that doesn't impact previous explanation as a whole anyway)
Scan? For the bulk I meanin chapter 2 its just straight up called an 11 dimensional bulk space
Are we still arguing that extra dimensions are compacted when later story shows qualitative superiority between each dimensions??????The same Imaginary Tree that’s also compacted lol?
Nobody is arguing there aren't 11 dimensions. What OP is arguing is that those dimensions are compactified aka super duper mega smolThe images here are pretty damning evidence of 11D i mean multiple times its just outright stated to be 11 dimensional and in chapter 2 its just straight up called an 11 dimensional bulk space so the SoQ should be at least bare minimum 1-C
Non-compactified and compactified higher dimensions can coexistAre we still arguing that extra dimensions are compacted when later story shows qualitative superiority between each dimensions??????
You do know M-Theory is not compactified in itself unless it's elaborated properly to be compactified, no?Not only is all this already addressed in the OP and by me multiple times, but that’s also not how M-Theory works at all.
Like please stop brining ad nauseum arguments man. Im getting tired.
Ether Bathtub uses the standard M-Theory which is the uncompactified version in which it is the 10 dimensional space + 1 dimensional time, the Ether Bathtub cannot be described in a 3 dimensional or 4 dimensional mathematical dimension in which the Bubble Worlds directly inherit from the Ether Bathtub but they're in their compactified forms instead of the uncompactified ones. Ether Bathtub is the same container who's able to contain infinite quantity of said Bubble Worlds..
You have to be ragebaitingAre we still arguing that extra dimensions are compacted when later story shows qualitative superiority between each dimensions??????
btw difference between higher dimensions isn't qualitative, they're quantitativeAre we still arguing that extra dimensions are compacted when later story shows qualitative superiority between each dimensions??????
I can say the same to you.You have to be ragebaiting
Please read the whole thing before saying something. What I am saying here is previous "compactified" stated extra dimensions are later proven to have qualitative superiority over lower ones.Non-compactified and compactified higher dimensions can coexist
Literally everything here is elaborated and explained in my previous messages and OP.You do know M-Theory is not compactified in itself unless it's elaborated properly to be compactified, no?
Ether Bathtub uses the standard M-Theory which is the uncompactified version in which it is the 10 dimensional space + 1 dimensional time, the Ether Bathtub cannot be described in a 3 dimensional or 4 dimensional mathematical dimension in which the Bubble Worlds directly inherit from the Ether Bathtub but they're in their compactified forms instead of the uncompactified ones. Ether Bathtub is the same container who's able to contain infinite quantity of said Bubble Worlds..
You can't debunk my argument other than you repeatedly saying "but it's already addressed" when you clearly didn't in the first place, heck did you even address the threads I linked that disagreed with Ether Bathtub not being High 1-C? You don't, you clearly did not do that.
It is basic literacy that String Theory, M-Theory, Bosonic String Theory and Hilbert Space are uncompactified originally, the only reason why they're compactified is because we don't have extra dimensions IRL.
Ain't no way we still pulling this in the big 26Please read the whole thing before saying something. What I am saying here is previous "compactified" stated extra dimensions are later proven to have qualitative superiority over lower ones.
chill. at the end of the day this is just a video gameLiterally everything here is elaborated and explained in my previous messages and OP.
You keep saying “oh wow, you don’t reply because you can’t debunk” but IT’S LITERALLY TRUE THAT I’VE EXPLAINED THIS STUFF BEFORE. You just keep failing to understand them mannn
Stop doing this Ad Nausem Ad Nausem Ad Nausem bs by spamming long ass messages with no substance
Firstly, I want a TL Helper here. Secondly… these are still anti-feats.I'm here with some discrepancies in the scan translations
First of all, the order of some adjectives are flipped.
"举例来说,我们熟知的”那个宇宙“,就是一类”4个维度无限延申,7个维度有限蜷缩,并且各种常数均符合日常经验“的”膜“”
It should be "four dimensions infinitely extending, seven dimensions finitely curving"
Second, it refers to "that universe", as a type of membrane which "four dimensions infinitely extending, seven dimensions finitely curving, and all constants match everyday experience".
Third, by "when the analagous distance between two stable membranes are small enough", it's not talking about distance, but rather the difference in similarity between the two. Aka, when two "membranes" are similar enough, they will start to interact.
Fourth, the "anchors" are chance encounters or special structures that can stabilize a membrane into a bubbleworld
Fifth, "projections" are when a membrane devolves, causing it to be affected by more membranes, eventually leading to only spaces interacting with other stable membranes to remain.
You do realize this means absolutely nothing…? right? Honkai energy is quite literally Imaginary energy with aids, and there are plenty of similar structures that it had created similar to Path space that were NOT Imaginary spaces, in fact? The term “Imaginary space” was not once used in Star rail, this argument is very flawed and very reliant on assumptions that are weird.gay dimensions waow
If dimensions can be compactified by getting close to each other, that’s an anti-feat. You can’t just say “oh they’re infinite when they’re straightened out” or whatever. An anti-feat is an anti-feat. That’s just how dimensions work.
Like, bulks don’t curl.
Paths = Path Energy = Imaginary Energy. They’re the same thing. Masterless Imaginary Energy is Path Energy before an Aeon takes over.
Not that, Cyrene didn’t just juxtapose Path Space with Real Space but aigh.
NOVA THIS IS THE FIFTH TIME JUST SAY YOU CONCEDED FOR REAL LMAOLiterally everything here is elaborated and explained in my previous messages and OP.
You keep saying “oh wow, you don’t reply because you can’t debunk” but IT’S LITERALLY TRUE THAT I’VE EXPLAINED THIS STUFF BEFORE. You just keep failing to understand them mannn
Stop doing this Ad Nausem Ad Nausem Ad Nausem bs by spamming long ass messages with no substance
powerscaling is THAT important!!Instead of putting words in each other's mouths (they taste horrible I prefer numbers), let's remind ourselves that at the end of the day this is all just a video game
)
that one ig? not sure tho
Ye but when you go 10 pages like this it becomes tiringchill. at the end of the day this is just a video game
But if Imaginary = Paths in Star Rail then can you explain to me how it’d ever make sense for Path Space to somehow be different from Imaginary Space?You do realize this means absolutely nothing…? right? Honkai energy is quite literally Imaginary energy with aids, and there are plenty of similar structures that it had created similar to Path space that were NOT Imaginary spaces, in fact? The term “Imaginary space” was not once used in Star rail, this argument is very flawed and very reliant on assumptions that are weird.
Ts is some sorta ragebait ngl. Not that it matters, cuz I’m not tryna prove anything to you. The mods can very well see the other messages.NOVA THIS IS THE FIFTH TIME JUST SAY YOU CONCEDED FOR REAL LMAO
stop derailingpowerscaling is THAT important!!
Understandable but lets try to still show each other basic respect, some of y'all just accusing the opposition :/Ye but when you go 10 pages like this it becomes tiring
I have absolutely no idea, but there is the location of said quote at the bottom, so unless a supporter knows about it, I'll try to check it myself.Yea what’s the context on this? Is there an actually stated cosmological structure for it? Otherwise it’s just as valid as Loli Yog Tao (ie it’s not)
-_-stop derailing
We don't even have TL helpers who regularly translate ChineseFirstly, I want a TL Helper here. Secondly… these are still anti-feats.
We don't even have TL helpers who regularly translate Chinese
Sure, btw its Durandal VN chapter 3 for anyone who caresFirstly, I want a TL Helper here. Secondly… these are still anti-feats.