The problem is, every time someone refutes you, like in the Low 1-C CRT people kept telling you that "being boundless in all direction" and calc-stacking with a made up timeframe isn't enough for universal size (and so, not enough for Low 1-C), you kept using and repeating the same arguments and that "your proof is solid and everyone else got debunked and would need proof that you are wrong". This is just one example I remember, pretty sure I could find more in your threads but I won't spend more time on that
Not me. That's for sure
Idk why you are bringing the majority here when I didn't mention it.
Yeah, the majority of Dragon Ball fans outside of this wiki that follow powerscaling subs think Dragon Ball is 1-A or above. But you know what? Said majority also doesn't know how 1-A and above works on this wiki.
And that is your problem. For you, even if an statement is an axiom to how this wiki works, i.e.: "Being boundless in every dimension" is not enough proof for universal size. "Transcending dimensions" is not enough for Low 1-A, or trivial things like "this guidebook isn't canon and even if it were it'd contradict your point", you still keep, not only using the same arguments, but deciding for some reason that you have given an answer to all counter arguments and that they are invalid.
I'm not gonna debate you over this trivial matter because I already know by experience debates with you are endless unless a moderator interferes. So, feel free to keep making the same CRTs you are making up to this point, just letting you know this way they won't be accepted unless they are so straightforward that it's strange how no one else noticed it before.
What you said about my position regarding the size of the dimension is incorrect.
It is true that I stated that this dimension has no clearly defined boundaries in any direction, and based on that, I said that it could possibly be considered at least universal in size. After the many objections, I clarified only two points:
First point:
I said that we do not observe any clear boundaries for this dimension, and considering the speeds shown, it can be regarded as at least universal in size, which would place Gogeta and the others at Low 1-C.
Second point:
I stated that if this evidence is not considered sufficient, then I am requesting that Gogeta and the others be rated at 2-A, due to transcending space-time and destroying this five-dimensional structure, regardless of its size.
This is because even the smallest five-dimensional structure contains an uncountably infinite number of four-dimensional and three-dimensional spaces, meaning that destroying such a dimension alone—independent of its size—would constitute a 2-A level feat at minimum.
That is everything I said.
I did not impose my personal opinion on anyone; I merely presented two proposals. I never claimed that the dimension must be considered infinite or universal in size against their will. I personally acknowledge that the evidence regarding its size is limited, which is why I did not object but instead offered two alternatives.
I am personally aware that some Dragon Ball fans are extremely biased and do not understand the tier system. They believe Goku is the strongest character in all of anime, with some even placing him at Tier 0, which is frankly absurd.
Unfortunately, only a small number of Dragon Ball fans actually understand the tier system, have followed other works, and engage respectfully.
Finally, I never said that transcending dimensions automatically places a character at Low 1-A.
What I said is that the Other World lacks the very concepts upon which dimensions themselves are constructed, and it is described as a higher realm. This does not make it null or zero; rather, since it is a higher realm and also lacks the concepts that define dimensions, it would be transcendent over all dimensions, whether infinite or possible.
That is exactly what I said—nothing more, nothing less.