Good evening. To start, I want to clarify that I did not say that Null is not a real black hole, but rather that it can be manipulated by its user to behave however they want. I will clarify and provide more evidence in my argument.
Let me give you all the information present in the series and outside of the series.
1) In episode 7 (at 7:52), a poster clearly states:
“
The singularity is actively consuming everything.”
So the Null is indeed a singularity
2)
If you buy a JCJanson Pen, there is a note included with a kind of survival tutorial for certain catastrophes, and one of them mentions “singularity”, with the note [not image found] above it a direct reference to the assimilation of Earth.
3) But that’s not all. In episode 2, we can read a document called:
“
Gravitational waves detected at Site 48.”
This means that from Copper-9, they detected the gravitational waves produced by Cyn’s Null, detected from Site 48, most likely one of the laboratories.
So the Null does generate gravitational waves, which is a very important clue.
But what is a gravitational wave?
They are ripples in spacetime, caused by the most violent and energetic events in the universe.
These ripples propagate in all directions from their source.
All Nulls cause this phenomenon. I specify that this is an invisible phenomenon.
Now, we know that the Null produces gravitational waves, and gravitational waves are almost always produced by singularities.
4) And
in episode 4 (at 1:23 and 1:25), we see that Nori is using Albert Einstein’s equations, the ones that describe the curvature of spacetime in general relativity. Which is the fourth proof that null is indeed a singularity.
5) On X (formerly twitter), glitch production
posted this image which literally contains the formula for a black hole, Schwarzschild radius.
6) Glitch Productions
posted a behind-the-scenes footage short on YouTube for Murder Drones, which literally refers to Null as a
black hole.
7) In episode 8,
when Uzi and Cyn perform a Null clash, the two Nulls start orbiting each other just
like black holes would, with one key difference: they don’t merge but instead violently separate, because they were created by different users and don’t have access to one another. That’s why they didn’t merge. However, at first, they were about to merge before being abruptly forced apart.
8) Liam Vickers
created several concept arts of the core located
inside the Solver admins’ bodies, and in these concepts he explicitly refers to them as black holes. This shows that they are connected to black holes primarily through their physiology itself. We can also see these black holes in
episode 2 and
episode 8, which once again demonstrates their clear connection to black holes.
9) The Nulls is
capable of to Bend space and light after creating it , which is main aspect of this. even further more, absorb matter around it.
Now I will now respond on the only argument that contradicts everything I've just said: the claim that null supposedly has no gravitational attraction what is wrong.
Null does have a gravitational attraction, but it’s controllable by its user, who can reduce it at will.
As proof
the small Null thrown by Uzi was able to massively enlarge the hole of Copper-9 because at that moment, Uzi had activated gravitational attraction at 100%. Which means that Null pulled in all that matter, even though it passed through a hole and therefore never physically came into contact with the matter. So how could Null do that without having any gravitational force ?
so in my opinion and conclusion of my argumation is: Null is canonically a black hole and behaves as such, but it can also be freely controlled by its administrator. Which means that even if the Null in episode 5 doesn’t show any attraction, Cyn can change that if she wants, as shown with Uzi. She simply has no reason to activate a gravitational pull on the Null that destroyed Earth. So this calculation just shows the potential of the Null and what it could destroy if Cyn had chosen to do so. And even if my argument didn't convince you, then assume that there is far more evidence showing that it's a black hole than the opposite.
