Anyway, my vote is
I. I disagree with Low 1-A Imaginary Space.
1. As i have said, having no dimensional information and even transcends dimensions stil only land you at BDE Type 1
2. Imaginary Singularity have no dimensional information doesn't make Imaginary Space have no dimension information either
3. We did you get that cannot be ordered in size automatically mean quantitive distinction is delimited?. BDE1 also cannot be ordered in size but isn't mean quantitive distinction is delimited. Also cannot be ordered in size is nature of imaginary number, i think Qaw already said something about this
4. Real Space flows from Imaginary Singularity hardly mean anything, like a physical dimensions flows from void of nothingness is a normal thing in fiction, your logic will make them all Low 1-A. And being BDE1 already made it not qualified as spatial object to begin with. Don't exist in real coordinate space is another supporting point for BDE1, in fact it will be very strange for it to exist in real space
5. Connected to every spatial dimensions. Oke, again hardly mean anything
Anyway, all i see is BDE1.
Yeah, most of this is just due to the nature of Imaginary Space, from what i gathered, the nature of imaginary space is, thing need to be projected into real space to interact, and that imaginary space is non-physical in nature thus it can't ordered in size, aligned with Imaginary Singularity nature of lacking dimensional information. And that it can't interfere with real thing and need to be projected just killing the entire argument about Imaginary is quantitatively superior to real space, because if it was, real space be a mere extension and reduction of imaginary space and it can freely affect real thing.
I will not say the argument is bad, just the interpretation is too high and the foundation for it is shaky
II. HooH argument
This argument seems convincing. It is mostly based on argument that HooH is a nondual being that is the union of all dual concepts. But again being nondual is not necessarily Low 1-A, especially when it not even involving the duality of space-time (space and non-space, time and non-time)
At best, if i'm being lenient, i can only agree with a possibly Low 1-A rating for HooH argument
Other Aeons who equals to HooH is another problem, as HooH and union of all opposites should and is zero-sum should be greater than individual parts of it