- 2,085
- 996
what would the next ctr should be about?
i wanted to do a general ap/dura and travel speed revision
i wanted to do a general ap/dura and travel speed revision
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Team Fortress General Discussion
- Thread starter Aguywhodoesthings
- Start date
- 3,116
- 1,213
Yes, but we still need to distinguish their physical strength from their weapon's attack potency.
- 3,116
- 1,213
We'll include Pauling and Civillian this time too.
- 3,116
- 1,213
I mean, I'm pretty sure there needs to be in-verse confirmation for that.
- 2,085
- 996
Pyro9278
He/Him- 1,688
- 529
Well, it seems that TFC Heavy is the only exception; all the others seem like fodder.
- 2,085
- 996
they tash
- 2,085
- 996
so what do you say?
- 2,085
- 996
btw almost forgot to add team ajax profile lol
- 3,116
- 1,213
Maybe, we'll iron that out next time.
- 2,085
- 996
since when tf was a team blue profile
???
- 3,116
- 1,213
Since always.since when tf was a team blue profile
Pyro9278
He/Him- 1,688
- 529
It's been on the wiki for a while, although I don't know why there's a profile of the BLU team before a profile of the mercenaries in general.since when tf was a team blue profile
- 2,085
- 996
yeah, it looks very old
i really don't see the need of a team blue profile, exept for really specific cases for hax, but even then you got to think if its even worth it
- 2,085
- 996
i should not be talking considering i added a profile for characters that loterally have negative screen time
Pyro9278
He/Him- 1,688
- 529
I think the differences between Hax and Hax would be so minimal as to be irrelevant. In fact, I think they could be considered the same characters, so... Yes, perhaps it should be discarded and a profile created for the Mercenaries team in general.
- 2,085
- 996
me before i smite down the team blue profile off existence: Just keep looking at the flowers....
I think the differences between Hax and Hax would be so minimal as to be irrelevant. In fact, I think they could be considered the same characters, so... Yes, perhaps it should be discarded and a profile created for the Mercenaries team in general.
- 2,085
- 996
got another version of the meteor shower calc rejected
- 2,085
- 996
is there some calcs between High 8-C/8-B that scales physically to the mercs?
- 3,116
- 1,213
Outside of vaporization weapons? I doubt it.
- 2,085
- 996
i did a calc rn about the destruction of the tank from mvm and it gave me 2,11 tons of tnt baseline ap
weird nobody ever tried to calc that
- 2,085
- 996
- 2,085
- 996
is a stupid question asking if i need a ctr for adding a profile to the wiki page for the verse?
Last edited:
- 869
- 620
I doubt this scales to anyone given how much health the tank has (10k at a minimum, according to the wiki). Also, doesn't the tank have a bomb inside of it that it deploys after reaching the goal? The hollowness should be much higher because of that, like 80% or something.
Not really, but it is recommended that you make a profile in your sandbox, optionally post it in a discussion thread for feedback, and post it when it's complete.
- 2,085
- 996
I mean... we got the destruction of the gigants calc, wouldn't it work the same way? i'm basing this off that tbh
Not really considering you destroy the bomb inside of it too while smashing the tank regardless (even if it was, i doubt that's 80%)
aight, making a blog the base some with some profiles, i'm not the sharpest mind in town for hax/abilities.... or basic grammar sometime
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:LandonTheGuy/TF2_-_Some_profiles
- 3,116
- 1,213
He’s referring to if the bomb’s yield is contributing to the explosion more so that the other weapons.
- 2,085
- 996
the bomb is deactivated (as we see in the animation that the bomb has while deploying), that's provably just the tank exploding like other bots when destroyed
Last edited:
- 2,085
- 996
ok i said kinda of a stupid thing, the bomb does not get destroyed, regardless it doesn't seem that much space on my opinion
- 3,116
- 1,213
I guess if the bomb doesn't detonate, it should be fine.
- 869
- 620
No, I was referring to the fact that the tank should be more hollow due to the fact it's carrying a bomb
Yeah no that's definitely 80%
There isn't any calc involving giants for TF2? Do you mean this calc? Those robots are not considered giants and have considerably lower health than actual giants
- 2,085
- 996
i can agree that it has more hollowness of 30% and that's fair, but 80% would mean that all of the tank is empty (also the mechanical arms that deploy the bomb do take a decent ammounth of space too)
Yeah no that's definitely 80%
Here brotha
- 869
- 620
It's definitely more than 30%. I mean not only does the inside match that of the 70-80% visual, there's also the fact that the outside is not a perfect block of pure steel, it becomes thinner at the top (There's also the fact that the calc uses Hammer Unit Measurements, those things vary per verse)
Eh, I guess? I'm still kinda skeptical at scaling characters to fragmenting thing they definitely can't in a single strike, but sure
- 2,085
- 996
i feel a 60% should match, we are pretty much taking more than half of the block off at that point (and considering the block it's not really empty, expecially with the metal arms inside of t)
i guess i need evaluation (again) if we are gonna apply those changes, right?
Last edited:
- 2,085
- 996
you know what? i'ma recalc everything
- 2,085
- 996
Hi guys, so for the next ctr i'm planning to do i'm trying to do some calcs that should help our case on getting the mercs to an higher scaling on a general level.
Calcs that have been done:
Calcs that have been done:
- Destruction of the mvm tank (High 8-C)
- The payload attack potency (8-B+) (Evaluated)
- Vaporization of bots (8-B+ but it might change) (in evaluation)
- Spy commits murder (Superhuman) (Evaluated)
- 2,471
- 1,795
do we know how heavy the payload is?
Overall seems good Imo outside of the 3rd one since it needs potential changes and Evaluations
Similar threads
