- 6,300
- 5,835
It's okay.ok cool, sounds good. thank you very much, and sorry again for all the trouble
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's okay.ok cool, sounds good. thank you very much, and sorry again for all the trouble
alright, everything should be fixed now. went back to update the LS values for all the characters, and i also provided the CRT links in my edit summaries. just let me know if anything else needs to be changed/fixed, sorry again@Sooshirohl just give it a moment. I reverted your edits earlier and now I'm reapplying them. Just link the accepted CRT while you change the LS, and then for all of the revisions to the other pages.
Update: done.
They made another intentionally vandalizing edit after you undid their first one. I just undid it.
The user said that there was never a discussion to add the note to these profiles, is this true?
there was no thread to add the note, yet it was addedThe user said that there was never a discussion to add the note to these profiles, is this true?
User reapplied their edits after you reverted them. I reverted it again and warned them.
Thanks for reverting it. I warned the user.
^ Intentional Troll. Someone got the Banhammer?They made another intentionally vandalizing edit after you undid their first one. I just undid it.
They also vandalized this page, which I've reverted.
Can someone ban this troll?
Blocked them.
do we really need crts for removing notes made WITHOUT a crt for the said notes?User reapplied their edits after you reverted them. I reverted it again and warned them.
Same edit was made by another profile, and undone a while back by Antvasima. And yes, we don't go back to old pages and remove things because they were on the page without a CRT. Make a CRT or don't remove information from pages.do we really need crts for removing notes made WITHOUT a crt for the said notes?
3 warnings now. Also, they did it here as well. I'm starting to think a ban might be necessary here, much as I'd prefer we took steps to avoid that.This user has 2 warnings btw
That note is a summation of the explanation given in this thread, which was ultimately accepted. That note explains why, despite that statement, the characters are not Low 1-A. That reasoning provided in that post was explicitly accepted by staff members, and a downgrade to 1-B was applied because of it, so I think it was fairly added.there was no thread to add the note, yet it was added
imo you don't initially, but if people get upset and revert it, then you've played part in an edit war, and a CRT should be created to resolve that situation.do we really need crts for removing notes made WITHOUT a crt for the said notes?
I'm going to assume they're just confused, and explain the situation.This user is very dismissive of the warning and even aggressive over it. They've been engaged in an edit war with staff over this up to now.
Yeah, I've given a concrete warning about that.Also, here they're changing abilities without a CRT. Even if it's accurate, it needs a CRT or discussion of some sort. Here they're adding a delete tag with no explained reason.
I have my suspicions, but I wouldn't conclude so yet. Multiple different people can share one belief.Also, their behaviour mirrors this user. Sockpuppet?
Good.I also locked the Tier 1 pages they were working on, being Tier 1, they should have been locked anyway.
No, I think it can currently be plausibly read as justified stubbornness.This person is reverting any reverting done by staff, and is being condescending and rude in their message wall, all over things they're insisting they're allowed to remove from the profiles because they weren't added via a CRT according to them. I'm thinking ban, probably a sockpuppet, but what do people think?
I don't think a ban's necessary just yet, some of the previous warnings were a bit unclear. But if they do continue with the same behaviour, I'd endorse a ban.3 warnings now. Also, they did it here as well. I'm starting to think a ban might be necessary here, much as I'd prefer we took steps to avoid that.
Banned temporarily. I'd call it more of a joke page than a troll page. It's being silly, rather than trying to cause damage to the wiki or infuriate its users.Troll page. Deleted, please ban troll.
well i also felt veeery upset that i had to see crt get passed trough vandalising a literal Wikipedia website, (lets ask wikipedia owners to give us ability to make CRT there so we can adjust what we dont like for powerscaling agendaThat note is a summation of the explanation given in this thread, which was ultimately accepted. That note explains why, despite that statement, the characters are not Low 1-A. That reasoning provided in that post was explicitly accepted by staff members, and a downgrade to 1-B was applied because of it, so I think it was fairly added.
imo you don't initially, but if people get upset and revert it, then you've played part in an edit war, and a CRT should be created to resolve that situation.
To clarify (since you're, by saying this, making an allegation about the user who made that thread, and the staff who accepted it).well i also felt veeery upset that i had to see crt get passed trough vandalising a literal Wikipedia website
Bump (Some bans needed)This user was previously banned for 3 months due to vandalizing and changing profiles without a CRT along with ignoring warnings, and even after the ban expired he is still vandalizing profiles and changing stats without CRTs.
@SageF
Here as well: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Ino_Yamanaka?curid=878433&diff=9271937&oldid=9252911
Unapproved. Already been warned for the same thing in the past, I added an update to that message and undid the edit.
Sorry to interrupt here, but yes, it is a valid addition. However, I don’t actually know this user, to be honest.@Agnaa not super knowledgeable on anything above tier 2, so is this valid or not?
user ignored the warning and continued