• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

@Sooshirohl just give it a moment. I reverted your edits earlier and now I'm reapplying them. Just link the accepted CRT while you change the LS, and then for all of the revisions to the other pages.

Update: done.
alright, everything should be fixed now. went back to update the LS values for all the characters, and i also provided the CRT links in my edit summaries. just let me know if anything else needs to be changed/fixed, sorry again
 
This user is very dismissive of the warning and even aggressive over it. They've been engaged in an edit war with staff over this up to now.

Also, here they're changing abilities without a CRT. Even if it's accurate, it needs a CRT or discussion of some sort. Here they're adding a delete tag with no explained reason.

Also, their behaviour mirrors this user. Sockpuppet?

I also locked the Tier 1 pages they were working on, being Tier 1, they should have been locked anyway.

This person is reverting any reverting done by staff, and is being condescending and rude in their message wall, all over things they're insisting they're allowed to remove from the profiles because they weren't added via a CRT according to them. I'm thinking ban, probably a sockpuppet, but what do people think?

@Agnaa @Damage3245 @DarkDragonMedeus @LephyrTheRevanchist @Mr. Bambu
 
Last edited:
do we really need crts for removing notes made WITHOUT a crt for the said notes?
Same edit was made by another profile, and undone a while back by Antvasima. And yes, we don't go back to old pages and remove things because they were on the page without a CRT. Make a CRT or don't remove information from pages.
 
there was no thread to add the note, yet it was added
That note is a summation of the explanation given in this thread, which was ultimately accepted. That note explains why, despite that statement, the characters are not Low 1-A. That reasoning provided in that post was explicitly accepted by staff members, and a downgrade to 1-B was applied because of it, so I think it was fairly added.
do we really need crts for removing notes made WITHOUT a crt for the said notes?
imo you don't initially, but if people get upset and revert it, then you've played part in an edit war, and a CRT should be created to resolve that situation.
This user is very dismissive of the warning and even aggressive over it. They've been engaged in an edit war with staff over this up to now.
I'm going to assume they're just confused, and explain the situation.
Also, here they're changing abilities without a CRT. Even if it's accurate, it needs a CRT or discussion of some sort. Here they're adding a delete tag with no explained reason.
Yeah, I've given a concrete warning about that.
Also, their behaviour mirrors this user. Sockpuppet?
I have my suspicions, but I wouldn't conclude so yet. Multiple different people can share one belief.
I also locked the Tier 1 pages they were working on, being Tier 1, they should have been locked anyway.
Good.
This person is reverting any reverting done by staff, and is being condescending and rude in their message wall, all over things they're insisting they're allowed to remove from the profiles because they weren't added via a CRT according to them. I'm thinking ban, probably a sockpuppet, but what do people think?
No, I think it can currently be plausibly read as justified stubbornness.
3 warnings now. Also, they did it here as well. I'm starting to think a ban might be necessary here, much as I'd prefer we took steps to avoid that.
I don't think a ban's necessary just yet, some of the previous warnings were a bit unclear. But if they do continue with the same behaviour, I'd endorse a ban.
Troll page. Deleted, please ban troll.
Banned temporarily. I'd call it more of a joke page than a troll page. It's being silly, rather than trying to cause damage to the wiki or infuriate its users.
 
That note is a summation of the explanation given in this thread, which was ultimately accepted. That note explains why, despite that statement, the characters are not Low 1-A. That reasoning provided in that post was explicitly accepted by staff members, and a downgrade to 1-B was applied because of it, so I think it was fairly added.

imo you don't initially, but if people get upset and revert it, then you've played part in an edit war, and a CRT should be created to resolve that situation.
well i also felt veeery upset that i had to see crt get passed trough vandalising a literal Wikipedia website, (lets ask wikipedia owners to give us ability to make CRT there so we can adjust what we dont like for powerscaling agenda 🔥)
Ok ill probably make a crt for that, since the AI stuff is literally tier 0 it does not have a place to that profile anymore.
 
well i also felt veeery upset that i had to see crt get passed trough vandalising a literal Wikipedia website
To clarify (since you're, by saying this, making an allegation about the user who made that thread, and the staff who accepted it).

It wasn't vandalism. The original claim on the article was unsourced, and Telomera's edit provided a source for removing it. This change wasn't later contested by Wikipedia editors or pursued as a violation by Wikipedia staff. That's just an ordinary, above-average Wikipedia edit. More info on staff's view on this situation can be found in my post at the end of that thread.

And of course, the CRT had greater evidence to it. Argumentation was provided, discussed, and ultimately accepted by staff. The edit was done because some detractors of the CRT pointed to that unsourced line on Wikipedia as a counter-argument.
 
This user was previously banned for 3 months due to vandalizing and changing profiles without a CRT along with ignoring warnings, and even after the ban expired he is still vandalizing profiles and changing stats without CRTs.
Bump (Some bans needed)
 
Someone added Tier 0 on Monika's page (Vandalism)
 
Back
Top