Thanks. To be clear, I prefer to include multiple statements for the same feat (hence the several scans for the UN being able to destroy Galactus) to reinforce consistency for high-end displays, though I can see how that may come off as redundant.
Indeed, I just thing you exaggerated a bit in some instances, especially when recounting the original meeting between Reed and Galactus.
Reference 23.0, sure. But reference 23.1 mentions new information about Reed's usage of the Ultimate Nullifier important for the point made in that small paragraph.
Understandable, I can pass that, considering how specific the argument is.
The Angela rework looks good, but I have still a few qualms.
I'm not a fan of such use of guidebooks, since we don't consider them as neither canon nor reliable. Showing them for trivial notions abundantly made clear by the comics themselves, such as SPC, ES and Longevity among others, isn't a great idea, because then the profile ignores other statements of theirs, such as lifting 50 tons, probably, I rekon, because unsupported by the comics.
Guidebooks should be secondary sources at best to confirm what the comics leave in doubt and still within reasonable margins, otherwise we end up in the fallacy of cherry picking the content we like and excluding the one we dislike.
I would include invulnerability not even as a possibility, because Asgardians are pretty vulnerable and Angela herself seemingly is; they're just absurdly durable, which is probably what the comic means with the term invulnerability.
I would put her regeneration as possibly, or even remove it at all, because I'm not really convinced it was her own doing.
I went reading the issue and Sera first explains how the temple they're in brims with magic born from love, then reassures Angela to enter without fear because "
You come here pure of heart. Whatever happens don't stop, whatever happens, you'll be well"
Angela herself is first taken aback by the fire that burns her ribbons, implying a hint of hesitation. She then moves forward and, as predicted, she is restored by virtue of her good intentions, reinforced by Sera claming she succeeded because she was moved by love.
This makes me believe the temple was indeed magical and supposed to burn to death whomever would have entered moved by negative intentions, but would spare the good ones were they brave enough to face the painful trial.
Is her resistance to forcefields legit? She seems to be entering the wall and suffering from pain or else, but nothing indicates the barrier was solid in the first place and she nullified it. It may have been just painful to traverse and naturally malleable, considering the trolls inside are not suprised at all.
I'm conflicted on her resistance to magic as well, she was seemingly feeling Sera's attacks, although they didn't seem to be effective, even assuming they were supposed to be at all in the first place.
I straight up reject resistance to Disease and Elements because they stem only from guidebooks and what I said above is valid even here.
I don't see the point in including the "flowery text" bit in the speed section just to disprove it in the same sentence, wouldn't it be better to no include it at all?
