• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All-purpose request thread (New forum)


Profiles need to be open to add this match
 
So ignoring the fact that these dudes are starting continents away from each other as a starting distance, the match looks like a stomp since no one can name a win con
 

Someone close this thread. The real debate was only up to page 2-3, after that it was just circular discussions about nothing burguer and a lot of "brainrot"
 

Someone close this thread. The real debate was only up to page 2-3, after that it was just circular discussions about nothing burguer and a lot of "brainrot"
Brainrot?

You mean cultural conversation
 

Profiles need to be open to add this match
Bump
 
can someone close this, don't wanna continue this matchup anymore
 

Profiles need to be open to add this match
bump
 
Hello!
this was posted without the intent of doing so and should be deleted for me to finish writing and properly tagging, please!
 
Pretty obvious stomp. Close.
 


has been added to profiles please close.
 

massive mismatch
"Uzi is like, 255 times stronger or smth, while Mark is 1 387 727 times faster
Mark cant damage Uzi, Uzi can never touch Mark" - @Mommyleona
 

This is a stomp please close.
 

necro
 

massive mismatch
"Uzi is like, 255 times stronger or smth, while Mark is 1 387 727 times faster
Mark cant damage Uzi, Uzi can never touch Mark" - @Mommyleona
Tbh, I like the ideas of matchups like "who will win: guy who one-shots or guy who speedblitzes", but I guess those types of matchups are unviable
 

massive mismatch
"Uzi is like, 255 times stronger or smth, while Mark is 1 387 727 times faster
Mark cant damage Uzi, Uzi can never touch Mark" - @Mommyleona

This is a stomp please close.

necro
Oblivion_Of_The_Endless and Vietthai96 handled it. 🙏
 

just links to a off site post (reddit) should be closed.
I handled it. 🙏
 
I think we can close this thread, two staff members disagree with it already:
 
Last edited:
I think we can close this thread, two staff members disagree with it already:

stomp
Handled
 
I would ask that the following thread be reviewed for re-opening, as the reasons for closing and creating a new in a Staff discussion are meaningless.

In light of the recent comments, there seems to be a genuine vote confusion (among some of the staff here as well not having 100 percent certainty) here and it's gotten out of control and extremely messy.
There was genuinely no confusion on the part of the staff. On the other hand, the real "confusion" arose from Griffin's vote, which the OP considered option 2 and option 3, with Chariot emphasizing why this interpretation of the argument was incorrect.
On the other hand, the Staff has made sure to read the entire thread.

We're still arguing despite options and summaries being posted which manages to fill the thread with more post than is needed.
In fact all the arguments have been brought up in the thread. There's nothing new to discuss, including the OP mentioning it, and saying he wouldn't not responding anymore.
I mean I already said I was tired of these long back and forth wall of text arguments that say the same thing over and over again. We aren't going to agree with each other. I agree with reaper about most of what's being said being nothingburger arguments or just objectively wrong. But I disagree on the outlier portion entirely.
I wasn't planning on responding anymore but since this is in response to the thread I'll tackle it since I have some issues.

This decision is extremely arbitrary, with at least 7 staff votes included, disrespecting the time and comments that have been brought by users to the thread, asking to Chariot to summarize his points, disrespecting the user's time and is not something the OP would detail, or at least an impartial moderator. At worst, this decision is only to prolong the discussion that, in my view, is already decided based on the staff responses, so I would ask that it be reopened and ended there.
 
Last edited:
I would ask that the following thread be reviewed for re-opening, as the reasons for closing and creating a new in a Staff discussion are meaningless.


There was genuinely no confusion on the part of the staff. On the other hand, the real "confusion" arose from Griffin's vote, which the OP considered option 2 and option 3, with Chariot emphasizing why this interpretation of the argument was incorrect.
On the other hand, the Staff has made sure to read the entire thread.


In fact all the arguments have been brought up in the thread. There's nothing new to discuss, including the OP mentioning it, and saying he wouldn't not responding anymore.



This decision is extremely arbitrary, with at least 7 staff votes included, disrespecting the time and comments that have been brought by users to the thread, asking to Chariot to summarize his points, disrespecting the user's time and is not something the OP would detail, or at least an impartial moderator. At worst, this decision is only to prolong the discussion that, in my view, is already decided based on the staff responses, so I would ask that it be reopened and ended there.
Since you closed the thread your opinion here would be appreciated, @Qawsedf234
 
I think that AmonInChains' assessment makes sense. I didn't notice a lot of vote confusion among the staff members at least.
same, I disagreed with the low 1-C stuffs usage and it scaling to anyone very clearly as well so ik my vote should have been placed in option 1 and the others were pretty clear where they stood. So this makes sense to me as well
 
same, I disagreed with the low 1-C stuffs usage and it scaling to anyone very clearly as well so ik my vote should have been placed in option 1 and the others were pretty clear where they stood. So this makes sense to me as well
I remember you said you disagree with the thread?, so i put your vote in total disagreement rather than any of the option

DDM admitted read the thread and put his vote.
This is linked to LordGriffin comment instead. DDM made two to three comments iirc, his last comment was put him in the same opinion as Maverick and Damage
 
Back
Top