- 35,060
- 41,649
Reporting @Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera for calling @Jinx666's comments and possibly a CRT she made an infection. Here.
Last edited:
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera
He/Him- 5,382
- 1,149
Oh my god. I did not call him an infection. I said the stuff he used to derail the thread was, not him or his arguments.
- 35,060
- 41,649
IDK why you would do that to begin with in the first place.
- 4,810
- 5,968
He appears to be calling the things that Jinx posted an “infection”, not Jinx themselves, so if you wanna continue to pursue the report, you should probably change it to better reflect what he said.
- 34,634
- 41,954
A minor note, Jinx is a She/Her IIRC.
But anyway, I do not think that post specifically was report worthy.
Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera
He/Him- 5,382
- 1,149
- 35,060
- 41,649
I would suggest some better choice of words next time around.
- 177,276
- 90,162
- Thread starter
- #31,248
- 5,030
- 4,046
Honestly, my proposal that they both "ignore" [Block] each other seems like the best option.
- 177,276
- 90,162
- Thread starter
- #31,250
I can make them unable to see each other's posts if they wish to.
Kellex
He/Him- 1,502
- 1,134
I was looking through some profiles and I found this series of bumps under Dalesean027's profile made by Arch0207. Is that even allowed?
- 34,540
- 34,956
Bumping after a while I can understand, but this is looking like spam at this point.
Ebihara
Any/All- 2,109
- 1,651
They have bumped on @Dalesean027 wall again. After seeing and responding to the warning.Thank you for being reasonable.
- 6,234
- 5,716
This seems to be an ongoing problem.
- 4,239
- 4,084
This is indeed an ongoing problem, infact he was warned previously for pestering bambu in not the same, but a similar manner, he's also changed statistics without a crt, all because of one particular verse. That is Shrek. All of this for one verse seem's excessive maybe a month ban from the verse at a minimum, with a final warning towards the user, as this verse is clearly very important to them to the point they spam and vandalise for it.
- 6,234
- 5,716
Yes I saw that.
So this person has pestered multiple staff repeatedly to the point of borderline harassment, has kept doing the same thing despite warnings, and has made unauthorized edits as well.
Last edited:
- 6,544
- 6,291
I'd say atleast 3 now, considering he just got unbanned 10 days ago and started vandalising again.I suppose that we have to ban them then. Would 1 month be sufficient or is more necessary?
1 month.
- 34,634
- 41,954
He was banned for a month before, so I'd say 2 months should be the minimum, but 3 months probably seems a bit reasonable too.
- 6,234
- 5,716
I'd say 3 months. This person shows no sign of improving after being banned for one month before and even went so far as to agree to stop harassing Dalesean and then go right back to doing it.
- 15,203
- 22,454
3 months is fine to me
- 6,234
- 5,716
Vandalism, inserting false information, ignoring warnings, harassing staff after being told not to.Okay. What should we write as the ban reasons text?
Any or all of these would work.
- 6,544
- 6,291
I wouldn’t call what he did was harassment, more like bothering them after being asked to stop.
- 6,234
- 5,716
I suppose. The sheer number of bumps certainly does border on harassment though, if you ask me.
Edit: and remember this person's previous offense included pestering Bambu in a similar fashion.
- 34,634
- 41,954
Being a pest to someone is technically the textbook definition of harassment in basic form; though in this case it's light harassment.
- 34,634
- 41,954
AceOfSpaces3709
He/Him- 2,003
- 983
I can confirm this. When ARCH first made those unauthorized changes to Death's profile and I reverted one of their edits, they immediately messaged me insisting that Death had Class M lifting strength due to a flawed calculation they did on a Spanish powerscaling site. I repeatedly tried explaining to them that statistical changes of that magnitude can't be applied to a profile without a CRT, and that if they continued to make these kinds of edits, it could result in a suspension or even a ban of their account. They then demanded I review the calculation to which I did, and pointed out notable inconsistencies. ARCH then started spamming me messages every time I was online, demanding I come back and review the calculation again. I told them that I wasn't a calc expert, that he should consult a member of the calc group instead, and that the said calculation was already rejected twice.
A few months later, they made more unauthorized changes to another Shrek profile without a CRT. I once again told them to not make edits like this both in the editing section and on my message wall. They said that they did make a CRT but no one gave it any input and that making the changes to the profile was the only way to get attention. However, their CRT did get accepted and the changes were added lawfully.
However, ARCH continued to vandalize Death's profile behind a CRT literally no one agreed to. I undid this edit as it was clearly misleading. I noticed on some threads and from my own personal experiences that ARCH becomes confrontational when they're disagreed with. When I reverted the edit, they sent a heated reply onto my message wall. I admit that I lost my cool in this exchange as I was so sick of them spamming me and repeatedly breaking the site's rules despite me frequently explaing the said rules to them. I did later apologize for some of my words in their CRT.
Shrek profiles aren't the only ones ARCH has vandalized as he also made unauthorized changes to MCU Thor's Profile, most notably adding an entire key/tier based on a calc they made that was quickly rejected.
Finally, they made one more unauthorized change to Death's Profile, with yet another unaccepted CRT. I went on their CRT and told them to please stop making unacceptable changes like this, which resulted in Death's Profile being locked.
This is the reason why I reported them a month ago, because given the history between us, I suspected they were undoing some of my edits out of spite as they tried insinuating that I was a hypocrite for adding a category to a profile, even though categories don't count as vandalism (If it's appropriate for the character) and you don't need a CRT to add them.
Last edited:
- 35,060
- 41,649
Do not comment in this thread without permission from staff.
Kellex
He/Him- 1,502
- 1,134
Spamming like this and ignoring comments from mods is how you get banned
- 34,540
- 34,956
I have applied the 3 month ban to Arch - especially as they've started spamming the thread which I'll now tidy up.
- 858
- 419
Not sure if I'm allowed to comment on the situation, while there is an ongoing support for 3 month ban on Arch, I believe 2 month ban is sufficient as they are just a minor as deduced from their behaviour. I believe during those 2 months off site, someone should provide counseling.
Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
Any/All- 2,021
- 918
I'm wondering if there's a language barrier issue... but even if there was, Arch could use translators to figure out what we're trying to tell them, and it seems unlikely considering how long it's been going on.
