• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

(GRACE) Adding Pokemon Masters to the canon

Status
Not open for further replies.
But yeah, given how other external OP branches of series canon like Xenoverse in DBZ or Fire Emblem Heroes (another example of canon characterisation, but non-canon storylines and events) are popular in scaling, Masters EX for Pokemon will definitely not be disregarded just for being separate profiles (especially when you can get ridiculous scaling).
FEH is canon, and will eventually be put on the main profiles, so not the same case here.
 
No, do not start Grace. He was referring to the new stuff that was proposed, not to my CRT.
Threads can change proposals midway if its all agreed upon tbh, happened loads of times.

This literally just concludes that all Masters EX stuff can be made into separate profiles and the use of disambiguations boxes for their versions from mainline
 
Threads can change proposals midway if its all agreed upon tbh, happened loads of times.

This literally just concludes that all Masters EX stuff can be made into separate profiles and the use of disambiguations boxes for their versions from mainline
You mean that it must... which I'm not doing.
 
Dont do it then idk, just dont include Masters EX in mainline then since its pretty much been decided that it fits into separate profiles.
 
My initial & current -However tentative that may be- impression is that this standpoint seems reasonable to uphold.

Worst comes to worst, points of contention can be gone over case by case, as seems to be par for the course.

No offense meant, all.
Wait a minute, you're a mod now. Does this mean that you agree with the CRT?
 
Wait a minute, you're a mod now. Does this mean that you agree with the CRT?
I'm not sure. The discussion has continued a lot since when I made that post.
Plus, I mentioned my stance was tentative in case points of contention came up.

What's the current case for the various sides of the arguments, if I may ask, please?
 
That the post and people's stances have changed in how we deal with Masters EX, and how we put it separate to the mainline canon.

You cant just hope another mod will blindly approve it, Get it pushed the way you want it, then ignore what is now being more widely agreed upon.
 
I'm not sure. The discussion has continued a lot since when I made that post.
Plus, I mentioned my stance was tentative in case points of contention came up.

What's the current case for the various sides of the arguments, if I may ask, please?
Actually, would you be able to close this instead? I’ve pretty much lost any desire to touch this again.
 
For the record: Pokémon Masters, as agreed on in this thread, is currently it's own world without many direct connections to mainline Pokémon.
 
Actually, would you be able to close this instead? I’ve pretty much lost any desire to touch this again.
I can do that. However, if any conclusions HAVE reached sufficient Staff Approval, closing this thread won't prevent them being implemented.

Also, this forum is still open & free; An argument's validity should not change just because a different person expresses it. Therefore, Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera: If you do wish to close this thread, or abandon it, please know that with the announcement of the thread's closure will also come with a query on if anyone wishes to adopt &/or recreate this CRT, so as to shoulder the weight of these topics. (Users need not reply, nor does anyone need to take over this if they do not wish to.)

Also, if you do choose to accept this, then the thread is to be closed following a 24 hour "grace period", just in case people wish to speak up responding that offer or in case other issues come up.

Is that acceptable to you, @Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera ?
 
So basically, Masters EX is agreed upon to be included in separate profiles for its iterations of the characters (if anyone wants to make them) and scaling points from Masters EX isnt allowed to be on main profiles (and at most, things about backstory/character interpretation) once this grace period ends.

I can write a statement regarding it on the Verse page too once it gets implemented
 
I agree with the changes as per FinePoint's reasons and findings. It makes sense for Masters EX to be treated as secondary canon with seperate profiles.

If there is a discrepancy or contradiction present in said secondary work, then all there is to do is to objectively index it as you would anything else. Elements from the primary source material may be— and can be— adapted into spin-offs without implying a 1-to-1 translation of feats or main canonicity. Of course, evaluating what is carried over would inherently be a case-by-case process, which supports the need for separation in itself. I think creating profiles for the Masters EX continuity is the most logical and organized approach to handle this.

I also want to gently address the thread's atmosphere, as it is becoming increasingly concerning. I would strongly encourage both parties to disengage from this circular and unproductive back-and-forth. Continuing to engage in personal provocation or inflammatory comments only derails the CRT and risks action from the mods, which has historically been the outcome in these situations or later down the line. As the saying goes: the internet never forgets and always remembers. The same logic applies in this situation.

Lastly, there is a significant procedural issue must be addressed.

It seems that OP is fundamentally opposed to the findings of the discussion and is using their position to gatekeep and shut down discussions they disagree with, which, appears to be motivated by a personal agenda, this discussion of which— I think— should be free of that. Allowing an OP to unilaterally close a CRT when they are in direct opposition to a majority stance, including input from staff and knowledgeable members, sets a dangerous precedent. It also goes without saying that, this isn't an isolated incident, but part of a pattern of behavior that undermines the integrity of how we do revisions as a whole on this site.

That said, if this this thread is closed upon OP's request, it should be reopened immediately.
 
I can do that. However, if any conclusions HAVE reached sufficient Staff Approval, closing this thread won't prevent them being implemented.

Also, this forum is still open & free; An argument's validity should not change just because a different person expresses it. Therefore, Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera: If you do wish to close this thread, or abandon it, please know that with the announcement of the thread's closure will also come with a query on if anyone wishes to adopt &/or recreate this CRT, so as to shoulder the weight of these topics. (Users need not reply, nor does anyone need to take over this if they do not wish to.)

Also, if you do choose to accept this, then the thread is to be closed following a 24 hour "grace period", just in case people wish to speak up responding that offer or in case other issues come up.

Is that acceptable to you, @Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera ?
Well, if people are that against closing this thing even if one of them caused this mess in the first place, I guess we can just see what your vote is and see if that would allow this thing to be passed.
 
So basically, Masters EX is agreed upon to be included in separate profiles for its iterations of the characters (if anyone wants to make them) and scaling points from Masters EX isnt allowed to be on main profiles (and at most, things about backstory/character interpretation) once this grace period ends.

I can write a statement regarding it on the Verse page too once it gets implemented
Yeah, no. I find an octillion different feats and scans to prove that Masters must be canon and then you come in with zero feats, zero scans, zero of anything and misrepresent my arguments, lie about the points I’m making, and you think your proposal to make Masters even more noncanon than it is now gets priority over my entire argument? **** that.
 
Yeah, no. I find an octillion different feats and scans to prove that Masters must be canon and then you come in with zero feats, zero scans, zero of anything and misrepresent my arguments, lie about the points I’m making, and you think your proposal to make Masters even more noncanon than it is now gets priority over my entire argument? **** that.
"an octillion"
four, where only one talks about Masters Ex in regards to its 'canon' and the other three are reaching/taking light statements seriously.

Anyway yeah, lets just get this over with now
 
The fact that Masters EX should obviously be treated as just a secondary source and anything that contradicts the primary ones should be ignored rather than being treated as a retcon for the primary sources.
 
Yeah, because the versions in Masters EX, within a crossover gacha game fanfic-esque story make it far better suited to put them in separate profiles rather than the scrutiny Masters EX faces because it doesnt align with mainline under multiple points. Pokemon, however, is a verse thats large and inconsistent in general so its overall just safer to put Masters EX versions within their own profiles. This also brings up no scaling concerns since theyre their own profiles
 
Well, if people are that against closing this thing even if one of them caused this mess in the first place, I guess we can just see what your vote is and see if that would allow this thing to be passed.
Since the debate's most represented stances seems to be between putting it as main canon & secondary canon, if I understand right: Are there any arguments you or anyone else would like to present that Master EX should be Main Canon rather than Secondary Canon?
 
Since the debate's most represented stances seems to be between putting it as main canon & secondary canon, if I understand right: Are there any arguments you or anyone else would like to present that Master EX should be Main Canon rather than Secondary Canon?
I think that at worst it's a safety net and at best it'll never even come up in VS, so I'm fine with it being secondary canon.
 
I think that at worst it's a safety net and at best it'll never even come up in VS, so I'm fine with it being secondary canon.
Good to know. I'd like to wait a bit for others to weigh in on this, just in case anyone wants to say anything, in part because I'm tired AtM & also I don't know Masters Ex as well as other parts of the franchise as I'd like to. I hope that of me can be forgiven.
 
Good to know. I'd like to wait a bit for others to weigh in on this, just in case anyone wants to say anything, in part because I'm tired AtM & also I don't know Masters Ex as well as other parts of the franchise as I'd like to. I hope that of me can be forgiven.
It can. Hopefully I laid it out well in the OP.
 
Masters EX will most DEFINITELY change tiering, scaling and debates with the massive amount of content and scaling implications it has crossing over (especially with Sean's style of scaling), and theres 0 need for whatever a 'safety net' means.

Its canon within its own realms, and can be part of a 'Pokemon multiverse' or w/e, but it most definitely should not be used to scale mainline or any other games in their own continuity. It's within its own thing and should have separate profiles to illustrate that, as is the case with most similar types of tie-in games like Masters EX to other franchises.
 
Masters EX will most DEFINITELY change tiering, scaling and debates with the massive amount of content and scaling implications it has crossing over (especially with Sean's style of scaling), and theres 0 need for whatever a 'safety net' means.

Its canon within its own realms, and can be part of a 'Pokemon multiverse' or w/e, but it most definitely should not be used to scale mainline or any other games in their own continuity. It's within its own thing and should have separate profiles to illustrate that, as is the case with most similar types of tie-in games like Masters EX to other franchises.
Wait... You only want separate profiles because you want to assume it's noncanon with no proof?
 
I think i've went over many times in this thread already why separate profiles are the best choice for dealing with Masters EX content...as does the majority agree aside from you. Trying to act as if im just making this statement out of nothing isn't the best ragebait atp.
 
I think i've went over many times in this thread already why separate profiles are the best choice for dealing with Masters EX content...as does the majority agree aside from you. Trying to act as if im just making this statement out of nothing isn't the best ragebait atp.
Literally all you're saying is that it's noncanon so it doesn't deserve to be on mainline profiles, while ignoring any proof that it is and hoping that you've spammed enough to finally break through my defenses and any ability to fend you off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top