• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
7,723
Reaction score
9,194
(The world of "Doki Doki Literature Club!" is a simulated universe meant to mimic the real one, and is made of data that both shapes its information and governs its reality, something that Monika has learned to manipulate on a Kernel level and allows her to destroy, re-create and modify said universe within said data over and over. The game files are also the basis of reality and its fundamental concepts like time and script, as shown by the latter being one of said files, which Monika can manipulate in order to determine the fate, actions and dialogues of the other characters, or also by the fact that Monika can delete or change an object by directly altering the file linked to it. The game files also make up nonexistence, as they could register the universe within them in both its states of existence and nonexistence when Monika destroyed then recreated over and over, with the game being truly erased only after that Monika deletes all of its files to the point of it being irreparable without resetting the Virtual Machine containing the game)
This is a problem I've had for a bit and now that it's getting more traction I might as well put my problems in a CRT.

So plot and info manip I have no issues with, that's fine. They both explicitly exist together.

However the concept stuff I disagree a lot with.

The game files are also the basis of reality and its fundamental concepts like time and script, as shown by the latter being one of said files, which Monika can manipulate in order to determine the fate, actions and dialogues of the other characters, or also by the fact that Monika can delete or change an object by directly altering the file linked to it.

None of this needs to involve or mentions concepts. In fact, it's already covered by the fact that information governs reality and makes up the plot/script.

This is essentially double dipping in metaphysical aspects for something that can just only be explained with the two given ones (info and plot). Information and plot itself already governs reality and will change reality (time as well) if the information or plot is changed. Info and plot stuff can also exhibit the trait of being independent from existence of what they govern without necessarily being conceptual.

Basically concept manip is pretty redundant and should be removed (and all things related like concept nep).

Edit: Apparently NEP 2 (back to NEP1) should be deleted as well since I was told it was reliant on concept stuff with void that monika is more nonexistent than being treated as a conceptual one. So basically the nothingness Monika is more nonexistent than is not some conceptual thing with concept manip being removed.

Edit 2: The real argument for NEP2 was actually that after universe was destroyed there was a void left in the files and the files still existed and thus Monika is more nonexistent than both existence and nonexistence as she could exist without files. However this argument doesn't really work as the files just contain nonexistence. They aren't part of a 0 1 binary with the nothingness. Monikas NEP would just be 1 layer into NEP1 as being more nonexistent than some nothingness isn't exactly enough but instead needs to completely surpass the binary of existence and nonexistence.
 
Last edited:
The argument against the NEP 2 still plausible so yeah, in the thread where that got accepted was also argued 1 layer of NEP 1, so yeah.
 
The real argument for NEP2 was actually that after universe was destroyed there was a void left in the files and the files still existed and thus Monika is more nonexistent than both existence and nonexistence as she could exist without files. However this argument doesn't really work as the files just contain nonexistence. They aren't part of a 0 1 binary with the nothingness. Monikas NEP would just be 1 layer into NEP1 as being more nonexistent than some nothingness isn't exactly enough but instead needs to completely surpass the binary of existence and nonexistence.
If the files are able to contain nonexistence (0) and existence (1), literally in the form of code/information, then how is Monika being outside of that completely not Type 2? She's literally gone and deleted out of the story lol, with said story and it's information already being able to contain voids.

I honestly disagree with your take on that. I'm fine with concept removal though.
 
If the files are able to contain nonexistence (0) and existence (1), literally in the form of code/information, then how is Monika being outside of that completely not Type 2? She's literally gone and deleted out of the story lol, with said story and it's information already being able to contain voids.
I don't have much thought about NEP2, but iirc, the arguments was:

1. Files contains existence
2. After the universe got erased, left a void, files still there so files should contains both existence and nonexistence
3. Files was deleted, Monika still there
4. Monika got erased, so Monika should be more nonexistent than the deleted files and the void

I didn't see about thing like outside this and that.....anyway i do not vote, just mention what was argued in the upgrade thread, well if no one have problem with arguments being NEP2 then well....
 
Alr. I'm back.

I believe that OP and the agreeing party are both oversimplifying and misunderstanding the argument used to dictate that the Game Files encompass also concepts alongside information and plot.

NEP 2 is a whole other can of worms that deserves its own topic however.
None of this needs to involve or mentions concepts. In fact, it's already covered by the fact that information governs reality and makes up the plot/script.

This is essentially double dipping in metaphysical aspects for something that can just only be explained with the two given ones (info and plot). Information and plot itself already governs reality and will change reality (time as well) if the information or plot is changed. Info and plot stuff can also exhibit the trait of being independent from existence of what they govern without necessarily being conceptual.
This is a very lazy and overly specific rebuttal, ngl.

You do not have to namedrop "concept" in order to qualify as such, as the basis of Conceptual Manipulation is basically to be some kind of abstract and non-physical essence which determines everything in reality, and you alter said essence, then the corresponding objects that are part of it are also affected in the same way (also because things like Dreams in Chrono/Sonic or the Heart in Kingdom Hearts, do not namedrop it either, .

Each concept is linked with its respective "object". In this way, altering the concept will change every object linked to it in the same way the concept itself was changed.

Concept Creation: The ability to create concepts. By using this ability, destroyed concepts can be restored or new ones created, giving the user the ability to create fundamental principles that govern reality and the world around them. With this power, one can create a concept that is unfathomable to the current mind, changing the world to match this new conceptual universal.

Not only this was brought up in the CRT that introduced it, but OP acts as if it's impossible for an abstract substance to be both Concept and Information at the same time, when it just isn't true (see Information Particles in Tensura). In fact, Files in DDLC do things that fit Concept more than only Information (which is just the fundamental data that makes up the, yk, information of the universe):
Now, I am not completely familar with the standards about Fundamental Aspects (they tend to become a bunch of wordsalads which need to be watered down most of the time to get), but can Information in itself affect everything related to the object instead of just the object? I mean, just look at the justifications for Type 1 and 2:

Independent Universal Concepts: Such concepts are completely independent from the part of reality they govern, except maybe of other concepts of this nature. These concepts shape all of reality within their area of influence and at whatever level that area exists in, and everything in it "participates" in these concepts. For example, a circular object is circular because it is "participating" in the concept of "circle-ness". In this way, the alteration of these concepts will change every object of the concept across all of their area of influence, while the opposite wouldn't affect the concept.

Dependent Concepts: Such concepts are abstract and govern all reality within their area of influence. These concepts shape everything, and changing them would either require the alteration of every object of the concept or, if manipulated directly, change all objects of the concept alongside the concept itself. These concepts, however, exist simultaneously with and are bound by the object of the concept. In this way, an abstract dependent concept can be destroyed by destroying all objects of the concept, restored by re-making an object of a previously existent concept, or changed by changing all objects of the concept across reality. This, however, does not qualify for this form of conceptual manipulation, and is rather treated as a by-product of another action akin to a "domino effect". This type of conceptual manipulation can only be obtained if the abstract concept itself is changed directly, and not by indirect methods. For example, destroying humanity and thus "ending the concept of humanity" would not qualify, while directly "ending the concept of humanity" and thus destroying humanity would qualify.

Type 2 Information instead... does not say as much.

Fundamental: These characters can manipulate information that serves as a fundamental building block of reality. This information is shown to compose reality similar to how data underlies a video game world, code defines the rules of a simulation or in a fashion equally fundamental to these examples. This may allow characters to rewrite the world to their whims, often by programming it much like they would a virtual reality. The ability can come on many levels of potency. The possible uses range from being the mechanism behind mundane magical abilities to rewriting information to change reality, causality or the laws of nature.

It only mentions that it's the fundamental blocks of reality akin to code in a simulation, but we see in DDLC it does more than that, as deleting a file literally forces the universe to retcon itself to not make said character a thing anymore. I personally do not think what I linked above can be explained with just Information Manipulation, as Concept is the fundamental idea of something, and altering said idea alters everything related to said idea.

I do agree that the current explanation on the profile is kinda eh, but I think we can work for a better wording which would make the message clear, prolly the Blog won't even be needed anymore, who knows.
Edit 2: The real argument for NEP2 was actually that after universe was destroyed there was a void left in the files and the files still existed and thus Monika is more nonexistent than both existence and nonexistence as she could exist without files. However this argument doesn't really work as the files just contain nonexistence. They aren't part of a 0 1 binary with the nothingness. Monikas NEP would just be 1 layer into NEP1 as being more nonexistent than some nothingness isn't exactly enough but instead needs to completely surpass the binary of existence and nonexistence.
About NEP 2, I personally began to have my doubts more due to "created and destroyed" being taken way too literally. It's mostly likely reffering to just Monika (hehe) retconning the universe like it happened Act 2, 3 and 4. Obviously the old universe won't exist anymore if the new one retcons it and takes its place, as prior the mail mentions that "Is it part of the butterfly effect from some of Monika's fundamental changes, or is it a result of her just messing around with the other characters in VM1 as her own experiment (or for fun)?", rather than some DBZ-like destruction, which kinda shoots down the basis of the files being independent from the universe they govern and encompassing the void left.

This also probably nukes CM 1 and makes it back to 2, and I personally don't really care about that. But as I said above, Concept imo should remain, whether is Type 1 or 2.

Edit: If this goes through, OP should also downgrade Imscared to be coherent, as its basis for Type 2 CM is the exact same as DDLC's. Back in the 1st upgrade thread Roachman (the guy who added said ability), agreed with DDLC also qualifying given the similarity of the argument, so if one goes, both should because of fairness.
 
Last edited:
Alr. I'm back.

I believe that OP and the agreeing party are both oversimplifying and misunderstanding the argument used to dictate that the Game Files encompass also concepts alongside information and plot.

NEP 2 is a whole other can of worms that deserves its own topic however.

This is a very lazy and overly specific rebuttal, ngl.

You do not have to namedrop "concept" in order to qualify as such, as the basis of Conceptual Manipulation is basically to be some kind of abstract and non-physical essence which determines everything in reality, and you alter said essence, then the corresponding objects that are part of it are also affected in the same way (also because things like Dreams in Chrono/Sonic or the Heart in Kingdom Hearts, do not namedrop it either, .





Not only this was brought up in the CRT that introduced it, but OP acts as if it's impossible for an abstract substance to be both Concept and Information at the same time, when it just isn't true (see Information Particles in Tensura). In fact, Files in DDLC do things that fit Concept more than only Information (which is just the fundamental data that makes up the, yk, information of the universe):
Now, I am not completely familar with the standards about Fundamental Aspects (they tend to become a bunch of wordsalads which need to be watered down most of the time to get), but can Information in itself affect everything related to the object instead of just the object? I mean, just look at the justifications for Type 1 and 2:





Type 2 Information instead... does not say as much.



It only mentions that it's the fundamental blocks of reality akin to code in a simulation, but we see in DDLC it does more than that, as deleting a file literally forces the universe to retcon itself to not make said character a thing anymore. I personally do not think what I linked above can be explained with just Information Manipulation, as Concept is the fundamental idea of something, and altering said idea alters everything related to said idea.

I do agree that the current explanation on the profile is kinda eh, but I think we can work for a better wording which would make the message clear, prolly the Blog won't even be needed anymore, who knows.

About NEP 2, I personally began to have my doubts more due to "created and destroyed" being taken way too literally. It's mostly likely reffering to just Monika (hehe) retconning the universe like it happened Act 2, 3 and 4. Obviously the old universe won't exist anymore if the new one retcons it and takes its place, as prior the mail mentions that "Is it part of the butterfly effect from some of Monika's fundamental changes, or is it a result of her just messing around with the other characters in VM1 as her own experiment (or for fun)?", rather than some DBZ-like destruction, which kinda shoots down the basis of the files being independent from the universe they govern and encompassing the void left.

This also probably nukes CM 1 and makes it back to 2, and I personally don't really care about that. But as I said above, Concept imo should remain, whether is Type 1 or 2.

Edit: If this goes through, OP should also downgrade Imscared to be coherent, as its basis for Type 2 CM is the exact same as DDLC's. Back in the 1st upgrade thread Roachman (the guy who added said ability), agreed with DDLC also qualifying given the similarity of the argument, so if one goes, both should because of fairness.

I think Strym makes sense here.
 
but can Information in itself affect everything related to the object instead of just the object?
If the file in question contains information type 2 that constitutes all objects with which it is linked, affecting the information type 2 within the file will also affect the objects.

What is important here is the answer to this question. Affecting Sayori's file, does it affecting Sayori because Sayori's file contains the information that constitutes Sayori, or does it affect Sayori because Sayori's file govern Sayori (or information that constitutes Sayori)?

The first is just information type 2 manipulation and the second is information type 2 manipulation + conceptual manipulation. It could be both, it seems you'll either have to debunk the first and/or find more proof for the second.
 
What is important here is the answer to this question. Affecting Sayori's file, does it affecting Sayori because Sayori's file contains the information that constitutes Sayori, or does it affect Sayori because Sayori's file govern Sayori (or information that constitutes Sayori)?
I don't really see what do mean by that.

Could you be more specific?
 
Alr. I'm back.

I believe that OP and the agreeing party are both oversimplifying and misunderstanding the argument used to dictate that the Game Files encompass also concepts alongside information and plot.

NEP 2 is a whole other can of worms that deserves its own topic however.

This is a very lazy and overly specific rebuttal, ngl.

You do not have to namedrop "concept" in order to qualify as such, as the basis of Conceptual Manipulation is basically to be some kind of abstract and non-physical essence which determines everything in reality, and you alter said essence, then the corresponding objects that are part of it are also affected in the same way (also because things like Dreams in Chrono/Sonic or the Heart in Kingdom Hearts, do not namedrop it either, .





Not only this was brought up in the CRT that introduced it, but OP acts as if it's impossible for an abstract substance to be both Concept and Information at the same time, when it just isn't true (see Information Particles in Tensura). In fact, Files in DDLC do things that fit Concept more than only Information (which is just the fundamental data that makes up the, yk, information of the universe):
Now, I am not completely familar with the standards about Fundamental Aspects (they tend to become a bunch of wordsalads which need to be watered down most of the time to get), but can Information in itself affect everything related to the object instead of just the object? I mean, just look at the justifications for Type 1 and 2:





Type 2 Information instead... does not say as much.



It only mentions that it's the fundamental blocks of reality akin to code in a simulation, but we see in DDLC it does more than that, as deleting a file literally forces the universe to retcon itself to not make said character a thing anymore. I personally do not think what I linked above can be explained with just Information Manipulation, as Concept is the fundamental idea of something, and altering said idea alters everything related to said idea.

All of this is still pretty possible with information type 2. It's a fundamental and abstract component that governs reality and to alter information of someone could just affect anything that could have relation to them.

I think files are taken a bit as more than what they really are as a computer file itself is defined as the collection of data on a computer storage device and DDLC doesn't really deviate from this definition much? Aside from the type 2 info. So for example Sayori's file would contain all information about her as well and would be just fine to also have surrounding information about her so in turn to affect her file would be to affect those things. Or like if information makes up someones history then erasing that information will erase all things intrinsically involved with their history. The points about things being ****** up also is covered by info type 2, cuz if the information of their existence isnt there anymore then reality will be fundamentally altered and reality cannot necessarily accomodate their existence or information about said existence.

The namedrop stuff isn't the main issue (more of a support really) but it's just that none of this is impossible with already given info type 2. I would rather not add in a 2nd metaphysical aspect for something that could very well just be covered with the 1st metaphysical aspect.

Edit: If this goes through, OP should also downgrade Imscared to be coherent, as its basis for Type 2 CM is the exact same as DDLC's. Back in the 1st upgrade thread Roachman (the guy who added said ability), agreed with DDLC also qualifying given the similarity of the argument, so if one goes, both should because of fairness.

I could
 
I don't really see what do mean by that.

Could you be more specific?
I think files are taken a bit as more than what they really are as a computer file itself is defined as the collection of data on a computer storage device and DDLC doesn't really deviate from this definition much? Aside from the type 2 info. So for example Sayori's file would contain all information about her as well and would be just fine to also have surrounding information about her so in turn to affect her file would be to affect those things
Yes, that's what I mean.
 
All of this is still pretty possible with information type 2. It's a fundamental and abstract component that governs reality and to alter information of someone could just affect anything that could have relation to them.
Huh?

No like, genuinely, at this point, in order to answer well to your arguments and concerns, what exactly does cross the line between Type 2 Info and Type 1/2 CM? Because their description are really similar to the point you can confuse one for the other outside of semantics.

I don't really know how to answer this. For you, what exactly is needed for the Files to count as also Concepts other than Information? Because the line seems to be really thin from my viewpoint.
I think files are taken a bit as more than what they really are as a computer file itself is defined as the collection of data on a computer storage device and DDLC doesn't really deviate from this definition much? Aside from the type 2 info. So for example Sayori's file would contain all information about her as well and would be just fine to also have surrounding information about her so in turn to affect her file would be to affect those things. Or like if information makes up someones history then erasing that information will erase all things intrinsically involved with their history. The points about things being ****** up also is covered by info type 2, cuz if the information of their existence isnt there anymore then reality will be fundamentally altered and reality cannot necessarily accomodate their existence or information about said existence.
This is true but, as said above, the "affecting everything related to the object" is said in just the Concept page. This was the core argument used for both DDLC and Imscared.

Because it being the fundamental foundation of the universe, affecting the file causes the related object(s) to be altered in return, and even including abstract stuff like the plot definitely sounds grounds for Conceptual stuff for me.
 
Huh?

No like, genuinely, at this point, in order to answer well to your arguments and concerns, what exactly does cross the line between Type 2 Info and Type 1/2 CM? Because their description are really similar to the point you can confuse one for the other outside of semantics.

I don't really know how to answer this. For you, what exactly is needed for the Files to count as also Concepts other than Information? Because the line seems to be really thin from my viewpoint.
Well the difference between metaphysical aspects really is just arbitrary imo

In the end it really just comes down to names and any sort of analogs for this scenario. With files already being covered by information type 2 I'd say that it does need to be more explicit here like files verbatim being something like the concept of a persons existence or else it just leads to redundancy.

Admittedly, other verses are also kinda bad with this thing where they list any sort of vaguely abstract fundamental force as just being a concept too but those seem to get leeway as there isn't really any other metaphysical aspect that they're covered by and the default for these people seem to be concepts.
This is true but, as said above, the "affecting everything related to the object" is said in just the Concept page. This was the core argument used for both DDLC and Imscared.

Because it being the fundamental foundation of the universe, affecting the file causes the related object(s) to be altered in return, and even including abstract stuff like the plot definitely sounds grounds for Conceptual stuff for me.
That's part of what a concept does, but it's not a trait inherent only to a concept. It's just a result of it being fundamental to that object. Metaphysical aspects also have no default hierarchy so being fundamental to plot isn't really the trait of a concept but more of a verse specific thing where information/files>plot.
 
That's part of what a concept does, but it's not a trait inherent only to a concept. It's just a result of it being fundamental to that object. Metaphysical aspects also have no default hierarchy so being fundamental to plot isn't really the trait of a concept but more of a verse specific thing where information/files>plot.
Ok, so... what exactly prevents it from being both here?

Just saying "lol just PC files" is not really a good rebuttal as fiction does whatever it wants, and if it has enough feats, then it can qualify beyond its potrayal.

It's not even a matter of reduncancy, because the fact that Information Manipulation does literally what I have listed above is new to me. From what I have got, Info is just the physical information that defines objects like data but it stops there, but in DDLC it seems to do even more fundamental stuff tbh.

Also because you answering that there's no real difference makes me question why are the two different abilities to begin with.
 
Ok, so... what exactly prevents it from being both here?

Just saying "lol just PC files" is not really a good rebuttal as fiction does whatever it wants, and if it has enough feats, then it can qualify beyond its potrayal.

It's not even a matter of reduncancy, because the fact that Information Manipulation does literally what I have listed above is new to me. From what I have got, Info is just the physical information that defines objects like data but it stops there, but in DDLC it seems to do even more fundamental stuff tbh.
I mean info is metaphysical and abstract, it isn't physical like an atom or something. I just think here it's a case of "you cant have your cake and eat it too". I agree that fiction can do whatever it wants like make info and concept the same, but that has to be more clearly defined in the verse than what DDLC has.

Also because you answering that there's no real difference makes me question why are the two different abilities to begin with.
there are people who share that sentiment and Ultima is one of them
 
I mean info is metaphysical and abstract, it isn't physical like an atom or something. I just think here it's a case of "you cant have your cake and eat it too". I agree that fiction can do whatever it wants like make info and concept the same, but that has to be more clearly defined in the verse than what DDLC has.
Well, ok...

You didn't answer my question, which was: What needs to be "clearly defined" here? Because we're going nowhere like this.
there are people who share that sentiment and Ultima is one of them
Inb4 this thread ends up as people not knowing where to go and it ends up making a Staff Thread.
 
My point is what it's exactly meant by "governing" here, as opposed to just having information about it.
Affecting/changing/destroying the concept of Sayori affects/changes/destroys the object of this concept, Sayori. This is "governing" in its simplest form.
For you, what exactly is needed for the Files to count as also Concepts other than Information? Because the line seems to be really thin from my viewpoint.
The line in question is often drawn according to common sense.

So it's really hard to prove that a "file" is a concept rather than a collection of information, which it actually is. But for an "idea" this is not the case.
 
Affecting/changing/destroying the concept of Sayori affects/changes/destroys the object of this concept, Sayori. This is "governing" in its simplest form.
Well, if you wanna some stuff, an example is the file manipulation including personality, mind and memories, with Monika using that to amplify Sayori and Yuri's personality to the point of becoming suicidal.

Them both dying didn't affect their files however, as they did pretty much still exist even after physically dying of course.
So it's really hard to prove that a "file" is a concept rather than a collection of information, which it actually is. But for an "idea" this is not the case.
So there's no real difference besides semantics... This is awkward.

Would the script (as in the literal plot that shapes the fate, actions and dialogues of the characters) count as an example of files shaping also abstract ideas though? Because this is pretty much one of the biggest pieces of evidence imo.
 
You didn't answer my question, which was: What needs to be "clearly defined" here? Because we're going nowhere like this.
You need to prove that files are what give things their properties/characteristics, or another way to say it, they’re what make things what they are (even a mentions of concepts does not prove that).
 
I can even see the distinction between Info2 and CM, because with the latter, I see it as manipulating a metaphysical chair, and changing it would change all the "physical" chairs in reality. While the latter directly alters that physical chair, but at a more fundamental level.

Like manipulating an object in a game, like Unity, where each physical object has various pieces of information and its own code.

I just can't differentiate when this information, instead of being "trapped" in the physical object itself, is linked to something else "metaphysical," like the object's file.

Like, having a character file where everything that makes it up is in it, and changing that file changes the character seems very CM3-like. So, I don't know.
 
You need to prove that files are what give things their properties/characteristics, or another way to say it, they’re what make things what they are (even a mentions of concepts does not prove that).
Well, if you wanna some stuff, an example is the file manipulation including personality, mind and memories, with Monika using that to amplify Sayori and Yuri's personality to the point of becoming suicidal.
That or the fact that altering the file of a character/the script alters the story of the game to the point of basically retconning the universe if the change is extreme enough.

Or the fact that the files are literally what the universe is built upon, and Monika erases it through erasing all the files, or retcons it through changes to the code, with the only way to restore it is to hard reset the Virtual Machine containing the game.
Like, having a character file where everything that makes it up is in it, and changing that file changes the character seems very CM3-like. So, I don't know.
It literally cannot be CM3 as the files include also universal stuff like the script or time tho lol.
 
Last edited:
I can even see the distinction between Info2 and CM, because with the latter, I see it as manipulating a metaphysical chair, and changing it would change all the "physical" chairs in reality. While the latter directly alters that physical chair, but at a more fundamental level.
Btw here you used latter twice lol.
 
That or the fact that altering the file of a character/the script alters the story of the game to the point of basically retconning the universe if the change is extreme enough.
It does not work like that. Where does it say "They are what give things their identity, or without them, things would stop being what they are."
 
Idk man, you are asking a pretty specific wording that most works of fiction wouldn't really bother to give and show it in other ways.
That is why CM is very loose, and most verses should not even have it, with vague mentions of concepts that are not even defined. And what I said is how it would be described if it was not called the whatness of something, essence of something, quality that makes something what it is, and concept of something-'ness'.
Besides, there is a thing that is pretty close to that, funnily enough, as there is a character without any data which is missing a real identity, mention and appeareance.
What I meant with identity, for example, the concept of tree-ness is what gives a tree its identity as a tree. Or another way to say it, it is why a tree is a tree. It is what makes a tree a tree.
 
It's technically still possible for it to be Conceptual Manipulation (Type 2) even when there's no instance of any possible uses (concept creation, alteration nor destruction) as long as it's established as a concept and it serves as the fundamental building block of reality which would be the Virtual Machine here — It was established that the Virtual Machine itself is composed of Information (Type 2) with data and everything that is and they all serve as the building block of that Virtual Machine. Which again is described as an Universe, for example: It'd still be a type 2 concept if time and script there were actually elaborated by the game itself to be concept that serves as the building block of reality. That being said however, Monika is capable of manipulating them, yeah. But it's not the type of manipulation that fits the possible uses in concept manip.

So, whilst they could be a type 2 concept if they pertain to the Virtual Machine as the building block of it. I'm still unsure whether it would be a conceptual manipulation in any sort of way. I'm talking about it being type 2 simply because I don't see the independence, someone could explain it but from what I've read on the justification itself, no.

About NEP2, if it's just Monika being deeper than her previous nonexistence (NEP1). It's just 1 layer into NEP1 as you'd have to be neither NEP1 and existence itself (As in the neither state of Nonduality) to even warrant NEP2
 
Last edited:
I am neutral in Nep, since I am not good with NEP.

I agree with the removal of the CM. Everything that was used to argue the files are CM the Info already covers. If it was going to give cm for these reasons, basically any info2 would be by default CM2 as well.
 
Last edited:
Does NEP1 really have layers
Here 0 means nonexistence or simply not 1
And 1 means existence or not 0
If something is emptier than 0 then by definition it is neither 0 nor 1
If that is not NEP2 then what else could it be

Since 0 already means not 1 / non existent
Being emptier than 0 means you are neither 0 nor 1
If this not qualify as nep2 what is it nep 1.5?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top