When did Feixiao ever say that. Also that could do to the fact that Heiliobis are immortal and can only be sealed. Also she has countless bodies across the versenot even sure if thats valid atp, iirc feixiao claimed she cant best phantylia and we have mfs like phainon and zephyro being strongest lord ravagers and gased so much its insane (now imagine irontomb and phainon merged)
words on the streets man, dw im still lazy to figure out the scaling, but im not giving high 3-A to everyone.
Bringing out EA like that readily already is something because he considers Phainon a threat enough and acknowledges him being the goat.
Who from Genshin exactly do they argue is a Star Rail slayer?Like, this has to be the best argument ever to pull whenever someone (whether ragebait or not) stated that Genshin Impact / Wuthering Waves beats the heck out of HSR like man 100% of your abilities are limited to your planet what do you mean
Horrible profiles, it came back but the profiles are marked outdated.
Fraudlogi himself (obviously)
Not EA's chain, chains of heaven being Enkidu, but ye.
The moment Fate in HSR has access to imaginary energy
When that happens, the Fate downgrade will ultimately come to HSR, and all the verse will top at planet-level
Dreamscape says no
Very poorly and don't understand what Aeons and Emanators even are let alone.
Not sure that'd back scale to FATE kinda depends on how it's written and how FATE treats collabs in their narratives.
What were the reasons for the downgrades? Translation errors? Simply being out of date? OR was there actually bad scaling before?
Oh my god!! All those statements about incinerating/annihilating galaxies just for them to be star systems that's a planetary system one?!?! This might be the best downplay ever!!
I just looked over it, but there were various reasons. Some were about the understanding of certain lore, like how real a simulation can be to be tiered as an actual construct and what is its actual scope, others were about having to accept certain elements of worldbuilding that directly limited any statements to certain levels (Like one that claimed that any usage of infinity was a metaphor for something that is beyond your ability to count, but that actual infinity does not exist, so most statements that mention infinity should be understood as "something very big that you can't comprehend"), and other stuff.
I see so it was mainly comprehension and interpretation of various statements, which on its own shouldn't have affected their scaling too much. But I suspect, like many verses on this thread, they essentially were argument stacking (much like calc stacking,) which is a very slippery slope.
i didnt say they are emanators of two paths but that alongside being emanator of destruction they posses power of another path, and are at least supposed to oppose the specific path they are against
Well, to be honest, I think the galaxy level is too generalized in the characters' entries.
they dont even scale bcs of that but because of funny multiplier slop and chainscaling, i already annoucent a crt for it so ig waiting is a good option
Both were holding back.
First isnt even explained why is jt exaggeration, secondly he scales to 3C and 3B from already fighting emanators like Phantylia, and Mydei said Nikador strike can nuke WORLDS which is more than planet level
No Low 2-C?
Not yet we still need a proof that the space was universal in size
Whether firefly was restrained or not, assuming that Acheron is a planet being restrained is not a problem. It is even intuitive.
No, wait with the dang heng thing I got confused with another mention I had in mind, the one about dang heng defeating a star-eating beast is legit.
Non-universal space-time isn't High 3-A anymore according to the Tiering system. Non-universal space-time just scales to the lowest significant dimensional level in question, so even though it's destroying all of time and space, it won't be either High 3-A nor Low 2-C.
what the..since when?
Since a like idk a year ago. Its been awhile
Where are Aeons at, Woomy?
