- 5,246
- 1,618
No its pretty obvious actually.As if this has some agenda to begin with, that's just a poisoning the well fallacy, the intent behind something is irrelevant if it's correct. Beyond that, I'll cite this rule:
Ah, so you're trying to weaponise how long and tedious the process for passing CRTs is on this site.Yeah, if you want to go against this you'd require a site-wide CRT on this standard, if you want to use it for any meaningful result you'll have to extract the substance and argue in defense of such point of view.
No actually, if a proposal is being made by OP, and i disagree, then im free to say those points and why. It feels like you just want to conveniently ignore
No one has even been discussing HOW we're gonna implement Masters EX