• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Possible FTL speed upgrade for Zhuo Fan and others

Status
Not open for further replies.

Youngwolf-0.1

He/Him
Messages
632
Reaction score
481
Edit: Hello everyone i dont know if this valid or not let's try this

So Let's Start
Since the calc get accepted by CGM so i can continue this
Here the calc
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Youngwolf-0.1/Upgrade_speed_for_Zhuo_Fan_and_Others



Conclusion:
For the results of the clash (black holes and star erasure) to be seen as the fight happens, their attacks must be MFTL.

Why Zhuo Fan scale on this?​

Zhuo Fan become Supreme Stage that a bove Sovereign. This puts Zhuo Fan’s combat and reaction speed well into the MFTL

Edit: Ohh i forgot to add this

Who scale on this if get accepted

Ten sovereign
- Stronger than sword child
Sword Child
5 Scared Beast
- par to sovereign
Maybe Half Soverign- since they can see the energy of clashing sword maybe perception

Agree: @Mr. Bambu @Elizhaa

Neutral:

Disagree:
 
Last edited:
This would certainly need calculating, yes. We can't just look at a feat and say it's probably FTL.
 
Well. Distance to the sun is easy enough. I don't think we ought to worry about the other stars, since I get the impression them "disappearing" is more due to the sudden appearance of black holes, but I'll agree to the notion of the sun itself being destroyed.

Now we just need timeframe. I'd say using the average human reaction speed would be acceptable since it specifically happened in a timeframe that was too fast for most spectators to witness, so 273 milliseconds.

So:

1.518e11 m / 0.273 seconds = 5.560e11 m/s, or 1854.76c, MFTL.

I would consider this a reasonable end of the feat.
 
Well. Distance to the sun is easy enough. I don't think we ought to worry about the other stars, since I get the impression them "disappearing" is more due to the sudden appearance of black holes, but I'll agree to the notion of the sun itself being destroyed.

Now we just need timeframe. I'd say using the average human reaction speed would be acceptable since it specifically happened in a timeframe that was too fast for most spectators to witness, so 273 milliseconds.

So:

1.518e11 m / 0.273 seconds = 5.560e11 m/s, or 1854.76c, MFTL.

I would consider this a reasonable end of the feat.
Can i use this or i need to move this on blog?
 
Can i use this or i need to move this on blog?
A blog, and you'd need it accepted (by someone other than me, since... I just did it, I can't accept my own blog, even if it is published by you)
 
A blog, and you'd need it accepted (by someone other than me, since... I just did it, I can't accept my own blog, even if it is published by you)
can i put you on agree since your calc has been accepted by cgm
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top