Can someone make the summary of the counter-arguments presented in the thread?
Really waiting on translation from mrtayman fr
But mostly my argument is this
1.) magicules make a world more durable. And a world without magicules is smaller and less durable. Our universe is a physical world.in other words, the lowest of worlds. The smallest and most fragile. Something without any magicules at all
Therefore true dragons can destroy “small” and fragile universes . Which is just in reference to how physical worlds are small and weak in comparison to spiritual worlds.
So unless other reasons are given, we take the smallest known world. Which is the size of our universe.(it is literally our universe)
Otherworlds are stated to be bigger than universes,which is in reference to other spiritual worlds being bigger than the universe they were in (they were in a world with almost no magicules) basically a physical world . It is stated that physical worlds exist inside spiritual worlds, proving that small worlds is just in context to spiritual worlds being huge,big enough to contain multiple universes
2.) due to cardinal world having the most magicules it is also the most durable world in existence . It is stated that no one could destroy even the planet because it is protected by veldanava power.as well as treasures that are even more durable than the world. In order to destroy the world you need to destroy the treasures. The world just instantly heals any damage done.
The world is so durable that even guy and velzards aura does nothing besides break a few rocks. Said aura is stated to be strong enough to engulf an entire star system.
The debunk was based on solar system destruction being stronger than velgrynds attack.
In order to destroy the solar system of this world, logically it’s output would have to destroy the planet and outscale guy and velzard aura.
Said attack that was going to destroy the solar system had
1.) Turn null/nhillity collapse (energy that created the world) and can destroy it. (Though obviously less energy than what was used to create or destroy the world)
2.)diablo skill that reproduces the collapse of a world (and more turn null) don’t forget that he can destroy the whole labyrinth which is 100 dimensions at minimum while even velgrynd destroyed 50. So he alone already has a better feat.so obviously it is stronger than hers
3.) zeigon got a new skill.and zelanus power. With zelanus someone who could destroy labyrinth dimensions with pure strength and also comparable to diablo (he is also stronger than zalario who destroyed numerous dimensions)Ziegon is also able to create his own world with it being the same nature as a spiritual world.(in other words. A world with magicules which outscales the durability of a world without one)
4.)dino who is veldanava sword and a mediator of the world who protects the world.who also outscales people with destructive abilities.
5.)All that was then combined into one spell which made it even stronger. Yet all it could do is destroy a solar system of cardinal world and was less energy than it took to create cardinal world universe. so it is clearly durability and not range
Conclusion:
Cardinal world is so durable that people who can destroy at least our universe cannot destroy the planet, due to our world being a physical world. With those same people having trouble destroying the labyrinth = labyrinth has durability on that level. And characters like Diablo and zelanus are able to destroy 100 floors at once, each with at least uni+ durability.
therefore the statement about destruction of the solar system was in reference to being powerful enough to destroy a solar system of the most durable thing in existence.
(Honestly all we need to do is translate vol 22 where Milim destroyed the universe) and vol 21 statement about universe being destroyed.