• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Is this fine to be use or does it still count as calc stacking?

Messages
1,539
Reaction score
740
Let say there are statement that said that dragon is larger than Moon capital City. There are no statement regarding it size except it is a large capital city. There however been picture for capital city of water which is consider a small capital city. Is it fine for me to pixel scale the latter and use it to find the size and weight of the dragon?
 
Let say there are statement that said that dragon is larger than Moon capital City. There are no statement regarding it size except it is a large capital city. There however been picture for capital city of water which is consider a small capital city. Is it fine for me to pixel scale the latter and use it to find the size and weight of the dragon?
It is since sizes and masses are constant, unless the result doesnt seem to match the visual showing with the dragon
 
Yeah as long as the size remains constant and aren't contradicted there shouldn't be an issue. Most calculations actually rely on first measuring the size of an object to then measure its destruction.

A bigger issue would probably be that you have to figure out the body proportions of the Dragon to actually apply the calc
 
It is since sizes and masses are constant, unless the result doesnt seem to match the visual showing with the dragon
Yeah as long as the size remains constant and aren't contradicted there shouldn't be an issue. Most calculations actually rely on first measuring the size of an object to then measure its destruction.

A bigger issue would probably be that you have to figure out the body proportions of the Dragon to actually apply the calc
Thanks.

Honestly, the first part came from the novel so there no actual picture of dragon itself. Although, people in the story does refer to as ‘big lizard’ so I might use it and upscale it to the size of the city to find the weight.
 
Thanks.

Honestly, the first part came from the novel so there no actual picture of dragon itself. Although, people in the story does refer to as ‘big lizard’ so I might use it and upscale it to the size of the city to find the weight.
I advice you try finding some similar calculations and see how others have done it before if you're unsure.
 
Back
Top