How does the Tiering System consider non-classical logics

[VictoriaGenesisBOA]

High 1-A+ is this:

The apex of this tier, represented also by a "+" modifier in their Attack Potency section (High Outerverse level+), corresponds to characters whose power encompasses meta-qualities, meta-meta-qualities, and any and all conceivable extensions of this process, being on a which in which their power influences the space of all logically possible worlds ("Logical space," where the laws governing it are the three laws of thought), being characters who either have the ability to actualize arbitrarily large worlds, or embody the framework of such worlds itself.

Tier 0 is this:

Entities who are completely transcendent over any and all forms of hierarchical extension. More specifically: They not only encompass the collection of all possible "qualities" represented by High 1-A+, but also exceed it utterly, existing beyond any and all distinctions between ontologies and any division between objects.


How does this handle some non-classical logical entities, which don't seem to fit in both categories.

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

Case-by-case, so it depends on what entities you're referring to.

 

[VeryGoofyToddler2]

How does this handle some non-classical logical entities, which don't seem to fit in both categories.

The case for “non-classic logic” needs to be established from the framework of the verse in question in order to be indexed as something that's inherently tierable.

Obviously, an example would be neded, but in as as far as comparing it to the two tiers?

High 1-A+:

Some things that are not established as bing in the norm which is summarized as the collection of all logistic possibilities infers something that can't be High 1-A since it would need to encompass that. This could just be 0 in direct relation to what’s non-logical to it.

0:

This one is more difficult. The wiki already accept that impossible logic do not work in framing it from the perspective of the philosophical concept. Verses can get away with describing that notion as being contained by the 0 which is substanceless because it would never be “impossible” to begin with and nonsense remains nonsense when trying to decipher impossible logic.

In terms of something being established as non-classical logic in the case of a 0 would ultimately be a rather pointless question.