- 19,281
- 11,978
Part 2 as this forum won't let me post more than 20 pics in a single post:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The fact that he was previously banned for similar offenses, as well as the warpath-like nature of these new offenses (however petty they are individually) makes me think it's deserving of fairly severe action. I'm not asking him to walk on eggshells or even be particularly careful, just to stop calling Digimon fans slurs.I am fine with a strict warning for Sean, but don't think that his behaviour is bad enough for a ban. He has to shape up or likely face a temporary ban, yes, but we cannot threaten with a permanent ban over something relatively trivial like this, and then expect him to constantly figuratively walk on eggshells all the time because he was banned previously for other types of offences.![]()
Your terms are more than acceptable.I'm not asking him to walk on eggshells or even be particularly careful, just to stop calling Digimon fans slurs.
In theory, this does look nasty. But we do have Offsite rules, none of the following are quite listed here. He may be a YouTube troll, and it's probably worth flagging YT posts like that. But it doesn't look like the type of thing to get banned from this platform. And Bambu also is making good points.Bro, almost all of the banter in the Pokémon vs Digimon comment section literally comes from you.
There are 118 comments made in the last 2 years by just you alone in that video lol
![]()
Besides that, here are some of the worst comments I've managed to find. I'll tell by the start that these ain't doxxing or stuff like that, as these are all made in public, mind you.
And youself have admitted in one of these that you've been spamming its comment section since 2019.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
As I mentioned on a different thread, if someone mentioned the OTL translation for the Chloe's Time Stop mechanics, things would turn out differently. I later asked a different question that I do not think was answered yet.Umm... @PHANtomFELdway made this comment on @DarkDragonMedeus's wall. This can be very misleading. Are these types of messages allowed?
https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/1017830130472726628/1351766179001143346/image.png?ex=67db91db&is=67da405b&hm=52ca456c77186f751d29681d606cb8da07b3a8af460ad3db12a439ae87637e45&
your suggestion to send digimon fans to the camps was a week ago lmaoDespite Strym's attempts to dig up the past
Can you wait a bit more in the thread? I had exams and a bit of more work to do. Will get back to it asap.As I mentioned on a different thread, if someone mentioned the OTL translation for the Chloe's Time Stop mechanics, things would turn out differently. I later asked a different question that I do not think was answered yet.
...Is that not the past?your suggestion to send digimon fans to the camps was a week ago lmao
I dunno man, can I murder someone and then dismiss it because "it's in the past"?...Is that not the past?
False equivalence. I'm not even dismissing it on the basis of it being in the past.I dunno man, can I murder someone and then dismiss it because "it's in the past"?
crazy analogy.I dunno man, can I murder someone and then dismiss it because "it's in the past"?
I think that is perfectly reasonable.The fact that he was previously banned for similar offenses, as well as the warpath-like nature of these new offenses (however petty they are individually) makes me think it's deserving of fairly severe action. I'm not asking him to walk on eggshells or even be particularly careful, just to stop calling Digimon fans slurs.
Four staff members agreed (considering you fully agreed with Bambu here) to give Sean a final warning to improve his behavior and attitude towards other franchises. If he continues after this, he will be permanently banned.Staff members:
So what should we do regarding the current cases here?![]()
Not only shields but also all mana is passive as shown when Gwen used here mana, everytime, it should passive.
- Dimensional Manipulation to "Limited"
- Dimensional Manipulation is the ability to manipulate the dimensions that aren't limited to just three-dimensional space. This did not occur in the evidence, hence, my "limited"
- All that was provided was that the Multi-dimensional property Mana allows shields to prevent dimensional shifting from one area to another. It doesn't actually manipulate dimensions.
- 4-D Mana
They accept as Higher-Dimensional, so it should be at least 4-D
- Nothing from the OP provided justification that Mana manipulates dimensions on a 4-D level.
You should transfer this to Magic
- Intangible Interaction to Purification
- The clip only presents Gwen using a mana to expel Ectonurites possessing their hosts.
- Purification is the act of removing contaminants from a person or object. This can either mean cleansing evil spirits or filtering out materials within a substance (ex. reverse osmosis in the purification of water). In the former case, this can be seen as a form of Soul Manipulation or Spiritual Healing and can be used as a counter to Possession. Purification can also be used to remove status effects.
The clip shown they in intangible, also when they use their possession ability, they will be in the Intangible form
- Intangible Interaction would count if the entity is perpetually or actively intangible, and a user can touch/grab them. Is a spiritual-ish entity possessing a host considered intangible in this case?
- Unless we're, by default, allowing spiritual purification as a form of Intangible Interaction.
This is Non-Physical Interaction (Intangibility [Immaterial]) not Phasing
- It was also determined that Ectonurites are selectively intangible. They are not perpetually intangible. | https://vsbattles.com/threads/ben-10-update-fixing-and-additions-part-9.176885/post-6998119
- The removal of Intangible Interaction was related to this.
Isn't you need CRT?
- I will acknowledge that I made the switch to Purification to allow the original justification to remain on the page. If need be rescinded, that is fine.
Wrong thread?Not only shields but also all mana is passive as shown when Gwen used here mana, everytime, it should passive.
They accept as Higher-Dimensional, so it should be at least 4-D
You should transfer this to Magic
The clip shown they in intangible, also when they use their possession ability, they will be in the Intangible form
This is Non-Physical Interaction (Intangibility [Immaterial]) not Phasing
Isn't you need CRT?
No?Wrong thread?
He is trying to explain what was "wrongfully removed" by Firestorm, due to him going on a cleanup spree after Hellformer and him implimented stuff that was never accepted in the first place should remain on the profiles/pages.Wrong thread?
Edit: Nevermind, it was a response to his post. But sounds like it should be moved to message walls.
I think you should discuss regarding this with @Firestorm808 on his wall or PM. RVT is regarding reports for rule violation and this sounds like misunderstanding at best.
No, he remove some things get accepted, since when did Hellformer add things that weren't accepted?He is trying to explain what was "wrongfully removed" by Firestorm, due to him going on a cleanup spree after Hellformer and him implimented stuff that was never accepted in the first place should remain on the profiles/pages.
A strict warning, but not resulting in that people in our community who dislike Sean can get him permanently banned for almost any small issue afterwards.What, exactly, do you envision regarding a final warning?
@Antvasima @DarkDragonMedeus @Reiner04Not only shields but also all mana is passive as shown when Gwen used here mana, everytime, it should passive.
They accept as Higher-Dimensional, so it should be at least 4-D
You should transfer this to Magic
The clip shown they in intangible, also when they use their possession ability, they will be in the Intangible form
This is Non-Physical Interaction (Intangibility [Immaterial]) not Phasing
Isn't you need CRT?
Okay. That is good then.@Antvasima @DarkDragonMedeus @Reiner04
The matter will be resolved in another CRT to clarify the previous determinations on the proposed abilities.
![]()
Ben 10: Mana Information Page Clean-up
At the moment, the page lists the following abilities: Conceptual Manipulation & Dimensional Manipulation: Type 2 [4-D] - Any sapient species can potentially learn to manipulate mana, an essence for every being in the universe, and it is higher-dimensional flow. It is tied directly to a...vsbattles.com
@Mr. Bambu @AgnaaA strict warning, but not resulting in that people in our community who dislike Sean can get him permanently banned for almost any small issue afterwards.![]()
Stop blaming me when I didn't do any such things, especially in the context which you're referring to i.e. the mana page.He is trying to explain what was "wrongfully removed" by Firestorm, due to him going on a cleanup spree after Hellformer and him implimented stuff that was never accepted in the first place should remain on the profiles/pages.
Stop blaming me when I didn't do any such things, especially in the context which you're referring to i.e. the mana page.
@Firestorm808 @Reiner04 @Antvasima
Is it fine to accuse someone for something he didn't do?
@Planck69 say agree with higher via Dennis' world (meaning he disagree with 1-A)
Also he agreed with The event is an anti-feat for 1-A (Option 1 before to be removed)
So it should be removed 1-A as it didn't get enough votes
How is that I get reported everytime I make a Gravity Falls cosmology CRT because of people not understanding what happened?Here, it's was add 1-A Although it was accepted from 3 staffs but also rejected from 2 staffs
@Qawsedf234 say disagree with 1-A
@Planck69 say agree with higher via Dennis' world (meaning he disagree with 1-A)
Also he agreed with The event is an anti-feat for 1-A/Option 1 before to be removed
So it should be removed 1-A as it didn't get enough votes
Not enough you need 3 agree without any disagree, to add itHow is that I get reported everytime I make a Gravity Falls cosmology CRT because of people not understanding what happened?
@DarkDragonMedeus and @GrathOfLux both agreed with the 1-A option (1 and 2), and @Reiner04 later on agreed with Grath, making it a 3-2 votes.
...no? From where did you get that lmfaoNot enough you need 3 agree without any disagree, to add it
Plancks saying he agrees with 1-B does not necessarily means he disagrees with 1-A. Just saying. He can just be more confident with 1-B.@Planck69 say agree with higher via Dennis' world (meaning he disagree with 1-A)
In that case its the burden of OP to clarify from the staff before applying the changes and closing the thread.Plancks saying he agrees with 1-B does not necessarily means he disagrees with 1-A. Just saying. He can just be more confident with 1-B.
Option 1 is:Plancks saying he agrees with 1-B does not necessarily means he disagrees with 1-A. Just saying. He can just be more confident with 1-B.
Also He explicitly said he's "leaning" towards 1-B.
Is still 3/1 is not enough for 1-AThe event is an anti-feat for 1-A, meaning that Dennis is just +1D compared to the rest of the cosmology
Says who?Is still 3/1 is not enough for 1-A