• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Part 2 as this forum won't let me post more than 20 pics in a single post:
y84hsOj.png

gQ25c6x.png

2Kfkr1j.png

LigwXBA.png

0qz3nXK.png
 
I am fine with a strict warning for Sean, but don't think that his behaviour is bad enough for a ban. He has to shape up or likely face a temporary ban, yes, but we cannot threaten with a permanent ban over something relatively trivial like this, and then expect him to constantly figuratively walk on eggshells all the time because he was banned previously for other types of offences. 🙏
The fact that he was previously banned for similar offenses, as well as the warpath-like nature of these new offenses (however petty they are individually) makes me think it's deserving of fairly severe action. I'm not asking him to walk on eggshells or even be particularly careful, just to stop calling Digimon fans slurs.
 
Despite Strym's attempts to dig up the past, I draw a very fine line between what I write in a Youtube comment section and what I write in the biggest VS indexing site on the planet.
I'm not asking him to walk on eggshells or even be particularly careful, just to stop calling Digimon fans slurs.
Your terms are more than acceptable.
 
Bro, almost all of the banter in the Pokémon vs Digimon comment section literally comes from you.

There are 118 comments made in the last 2 years by just you alone in that video lol

wXsO4J3.png


Besides that, here are some of the worst comments I've managed to find. I'll tell by the start that these ain't doxxing or stuff like that, as these are all made in public, mind you.

And youself have admitted in one of these that you've been spamming its comment section since 2019.
klWkK83.png

R83tM6R.png

lcV8YjX.png

dk69MKQ.png

LWBMqRT.png

uxT4xkk.png

MGxnN6E.png

hNrbTyV.png

oNQsFgc.png

hKaHQOu.png

C0MoIGk.png

murqoWU.png

dhQ4hyI.png

1bl0lDw.png

JhGPBVq.png

m72eMMS.png

KFzbmcw.png

DAtIX29.png
In theory, this does look nasty. But we do have Offsite rules, none of the following are quite listed here. He may be a YouTube troll, and it's probably worth flagging YT posts like that. But it doesn't look like the type of thing to get banned from this platform. And Bambu also is making good points.

Umm... @PHANtomFELdway made this comment on @DarkDragonMedeus's wall. This can be very misleading. Are these types of messages allowed?
https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/1017830130472726628/1351766179001143346/image.png?ex=67db91db&is=67da405b&hm=52ca456c77186f751d29681d606cb8da07b3a8af460ad3db12a439ae87637e45&
As I mentioned on a different thread, if someone mentioned the OTL translation for the Chloe's Time Stop mechanics, things would turn out differently. I later asked a different question that I do not think was answered yet.
 
As I mentioned on a different thread, if someone mentioned the OTL translation for the Chloe's Time Stop mechanics, things would turn out differently. I later asked a different question that I do not think was answered yet.
Can you wait a bit more in the thread? I had exams and a bit of more work to do. Will get back to it asap.
 
The fact that he was previously banned for similar offenses, as well as the warpath-like nature of these new offenses (however petty they are individually) makes me think it's deserving of fairly severe action. I'm not asking him to walk on eggshells or even be particularly careful, just to stop calling Digimon fans slurs.
I think that is perfectly reasonable. 🙏

Also, Sean, please try to calm down in general. The Digimon issue is not remotely worth getting so long-term agitated about.

Is Digimon more powerful in general? Probably.

Is it nearly as popular and entertaining for the public at large? No.

The quality of a fictional work does not depend on how powerful it is in powerscaling terms. If it did, then Lionel Suggs would be the greatest literary genius of our time.
 
  • Dimensional Manipulation to "Limited"
    • Dimensional Manipulation is the ability to manipulate the dimensions that aren't limited to just three-dimensional space. This did not occur in the evidence, hence, my "limited"
    • All that was provided was that the Multi-dimensional property Mana allows shields to prevent dimensional shifting from one area to another. It doesn't actually manipulate dimensions.
    • 4-D Mana
Not only shields but also all mana is passive as shown when Gwen used here mana, everytime, it should passive.
      • Nothing from the OP provided justification that Mana manipulates dimensions on a 4-D level.
They accept as Higher-Dimensional, so it should be at least 4-D
  • Intangible Interaction to Purification
    • The clip only presents Gwen using a mana to expel Ectonurites possessing their hosts.
      • Purification is the act of removing contaminants from a person or object. This can either mean cleansing evil spirits or filtering out materials within a substance (ex. reverse osmosis in the purification of water). In the former case, this can be seen as a form of Soul Manipulation or Spiritual Healing and can be used as a counter to Possession. Purification can also be used to remove status effects.
You should transfer this to Magic
  • Intangible Interaction would count if the entity is perpetually or actively intangible, and a user can touch/grab them. Is a spiritual-ish entity possessing a host considered intangible in this case?
    • Unless we're, by default, allowing spiritual purification as a form of Intangible Interaction.
The clip shown they in intangible, also when they use their possession ability, they will be in the Intangible form
This is Non-Physical Interaction (Intangibility [Immaterial]) not Phasing
  • I will acknowledge that I made the switch to Purification to allow the original justification to remain on the page. If need be rescinded, that is fine.
Isn't you need CRT?
 
Not only shields but also all mana is passive as shown when Gwen used here mana, everytime, it should passive.

They accept as Higher-Dimensional, so it should be at least 4-D

You should transfer this to Magic

The clip shown they in intangible, also when they use their possession ability, they will be in the Intangible form

This is Non-Physical Interaction (Intangibility [Immaterial]) not Phasing

Isn't you need CRT?
Wrong thread?

Edit: Nevermind, it was a response to his post. But sounds like it should be moved to message walls.
 
Wrong thread?

Edit: Nevermind, it was a response to his post. But sounds like it should be moved to message walls.
He is trying to explain what was "wrongfully removed" by Firestorm, due to him going on a cleanup spree after Hellformer and him implimented stuff that was never accepted in the first place should remain on the profiles/pages.
 
He is trying to explain what was "wrongfully removed" by Firestorm, due to him going on a cleanup spree after Hellformer and him implimented stuff that was never accepted in the first place should remain on the profiles/pages.
No, he remove some things get accepted, since when did Hellformer add things that weren't accepted?
 
Not only shields but also all mana is passive as shown when Gwen used here mana, everytime, it should passive.

They accept as Higher-Dimensional, so it should be at least 4-D

You should transfer this to Magic

The clip shown they in intangible, also when they use their possession ability, they will be in the Intangible form

This is Non-Physical Interaction (Intangibility [Immaterial]) not Phasing

Isn't you need CRT?
@Antvasima @DarkDragonMedeus @Reiner04

The matter will be resolved in another CRT to clarify the previous determinations on the proposed abilities.

 
@Antvasima @DarkDragonMedeus @Reiner04

The matter will be resolved in another CRT to clarify the previous determinations on the proposed abilities.

Okay. That is good then. 🙏
 
I'm not sure what you mean by "draft"- are we to set specific clauses to this warning?
 
Well, just a draft text for what his warning should say. 🙏
 
He is trying to explain what was "wrongfully removed" by Firestorm, due to him going on a cleanup spree after Hellformer and him implimented stuff that was never accepted in the first place should remain on the profiles/pages.
Stop blaming me when I didn't do any such things, especially in the context which you're referring to i.e. the mana page.

@Firestorm808 @Reiner04 @Antvasima
Is it fine to accuse someone for something he didn't do?
 
Stop blaming me when I didn't do any such things, especially in the context which you're referring to i.e. the mana page.

@Firestorm808 @Reiner04 @Antvasima
Is it fine to accuse someone for something he didn't do?
I am in btw a chess play that I have to win or else I am...iykyk

It seems to be misunderstanding honestly but yeah. @Dark_Soul20189 I'd suggest to choose the wording and names you take carefully in future. I know you meant to clarify the report and why its being discussed in RVR. but It can come off as accusation sometimes. Nothing else is needed. Let's move on. No more discussions on it.
 
Here, it's was add 1-A Although it was accepted from 3 staffs but also rejected from 2 staffs
@Qawsedf234 say disagree with 1-A
@Planck69 say agree with higher via Dennis' world (meaning he disagree with 1-A)
Also he agreed with The event is an anti-feat for 1-A (Option 1 before to be removed)
So it should be removed 1-A as it didn't get enough votes
 
Last edited:
Here, it's was add 1-A Although it was accepted from 3 staffs but also rejected from 2 staffs
@Qawsedf234 say disagree with 1-A

@Planck69 say agree with higher via Dennis' world (meaning he disagree with 1-A)

Also he agreed with The event is an anti-feat for 1-A/Option 1 before to be removed

So it should be removed 1-A as it didn't get enough votes
How is that I get reported everytime I make a Gravity Falls cosmology CRT because of people not understanding what happened?

@DarkDragonMedeus and @GrathOfLux both agreed with the 1-A option (1 and 2), and @Reiner04 later on agreed with Grath, making it a 3-2 votes.
 
Plancks saying he agrees with 1-B does not necessarily means he disagrees with 1-A. Just saying. He can just be more confident with 1-B.
In that case its the burden of OP to clarify from the staff before applying the changes and closing the thread.
 
It sounds more like 3 to 1 + a neutral. Though, normally, it's if the votes outnumber disagree by three; then it can be an approach. But it's case by case, it has more to do with the points of each side rather than the sheer numbers, and ranks of individual staff can take some consideration into account.
 
Plancks saying he agrees with 1-B does not necessarily means he disagrees with 1-A. Just saying. He can just be more confident with 1-B.

Also He explicitly said he's "leaning" towards 1-B.
Option 1 is:
The event is an anti-feat for 1-A, meaning that Dennis is just +1D compared to the rest of the cosmology
Is still 3/1 is not enough for 1-A
 
Back
Top