@Antvasima
Went against Damage with this comment, insinuating Damage disagrees just because (when Damage has been debating the entire thread, but just because they don't agree with his arguments, repeatedly has asked to has his vote invalidated)
Damage tries to clarify that he simply doesn't have the time right now for an in-depth response.
Then doubles down misinterpreting it, practically demanding Damage to change his vote
Damage once again tries to explain and clarify that he only meant that the thread can continue even without it, while leaving his position clear (reminder again, just because they don't like his points, doesn't mean he can't maintain his disagreement)
Yet Samlex continued to want to invalidate Damage's vote, demanding him to keep arguing (when he already has argued throughout the thread to give his position).
This comes after the thread finally calmed down after getting a bit heated, which honestly made it the more egregious to me that they so insistently went after Damage, when literally all Damage did was give a heads up about his lack of time to properly respond OP's most recent argument. As such, I gave him a time out to avoid the thread devolving into that (which if you read the rest of the posts from these, started getting derailed indeed)
Now, Damage did make an off-handed comment after the initial exchanges, but since our policy is for these kind of things to be handled privately (and I know Damage realizes he did wrong there), I didn't comment on it