Wiki All Cardinal Tier

[lordozantr]

First of all, I don't know much about the forum, I don't know if I chose the right topic, forgive me

And what I want to say is that I noticed that not all cardinals are declared on the wiki, so there are people who are ignorant about it, the argument below is an article that will inform and explain about the rank of cardinals. Please indicate if there is an incorrect measurement.

aleph-null=High 1-B
Aleph-1=Low 1-A
Aleph-2=Baseline 1-A
Aleph-Omega=1-A+
inaccesible Cardinal= Baseline High 1-A Hyper inaccesible Cardinal=High 1-A^inf mahlo cardinal=Baseline 0
Weakly Compact Cardinal=0^inf
Ethereal Cardinal=0^inf
Ramsey Cardinal=0^inf
Woodin Cardinal=0^inf(Again, we can't fill it with infinities, I write it like this because we can't define it)
Strongly Compact=0^inf
Super Compact=0^inf
I0=0^inf
Reinhardt Cardinal=0^inf
Berkeley Cardinal=0^ the order from top to bottom is small to large, not complicated, the top gives the fewest tiers, the bottom gives the highest tier (According to the articles and sources I looked at, Woodin< strongly compact≤supercompact is listed as such)( and in another article it is stated that the cardinal axiom I0 comes after Reinhard)

 

[The_forgetten]

I agree no problem

 

[VegetaSama1453]

looks nice

 

[The_forgetten]

güzel görünüyor koçan

OI helped the obese poet, my friend, there's no way he could be wrong

 

[Vietthai96]

Aleph-0 is either High 3-A, 2-A or High 1-B depend on how the verse in question portray it

Aleph-1 is either Low 2-C, Low 1-C or Low 1-A depend on how the verse in question portray it

I'm not sure from Aleph-2 onward but yeah Aleph-Omega is 1-A+. Inaccessible Cardinal is baseline High 1-A and Mahlo Cardinal is baseline tier 0

 

[The_forgetten]

Aleph-0, söz konusu ayetin onu nasıl tasvir ettiğine bağlı olarak Yüksek 3-A, 2-A veya Yüksek 1-B'dir.

Aleph-1, söz konusu ayetin onu nasıl tasvir ettiğine bağlı olarak Düşük 2-C, Düşük 1-C veya Düşük 1-A'dır.

Aleph-2'den itibaren emin değilim ama evet Aleph-Omega 1-A+. Erişilemez Kardinal temel Yüksek 1-A'dır ve Mahlo Kardinal temel düzey 0'dır

BIt would be more correct to support them with dimensions that have a certain level of quality, because N, that is, in the set of natural numbers, also includes integers with an infinite number of integers with spatial dimensions. If it supports and has qualitative superiority for each spatial dimension and ad infinitum goes, this level would be a composite hierarchy h1b anyway, basically looking at the quality of any other number. As it is qualitatively larger than the number, in this case aleph would be 0=h1b,aleph1=1a,aleph2=1a anyway, these have sets that repeat themselves endlessly. This is how it works in cantor's paradox

 

[Vietthai96]

Well, that only work with aleph-0 and aleph-1 which need qualitative superior between each dimension layers, from Aleph-Omega onward, if the cosmology structure being mentioned as large as the cardinal itself, the cosmology automatically gain the tier

 

[The_forgetten]

Bunları belirli bir kalite düzeyine sahip boyutlarla desteklemek daha doğru olacaktır çünkü N, yani doğal sayılar kümesinde, uzamsal boyutlara sahip sonsuz sayıda tam sayı içeren tam sayıları da içerir. Destekliyorsa ve her bir uzamsal boyut için niteliksel üstünlüğe sahipse ve sonsuza kadar giderse, bu düzey zaten, temel olarak başka herhangi bir sayının kalitesine bakarak, bileşik bir h1b hiyerarşisi olacaktır. Nitelik olarak sayıdan büyük olduğu için, bu durumda aleph zaten 0=h1b,aleph1=1a,aleph2=1a olacaktır, bunların kendilerini sonsuza kadar tekrar eden kümeleri vardır. Cantor paradoksunda işler böyle yürür

Actually, what you said is relatively correct, this is something that can change depending on the context in cosmology, in this case, even 2a could be taken as the lowest, but consider the ratio of the numbers to each other. Its quality is greater than the previous number, which means that numbers that go on to infinity in this way form the set of natural numbers, and in any cosmology the proportions of dimensions If it has a qualitative advantage, it is an example of N, that is, the set of natural numbers.

 

[The_forgetten]

Eh, bu sadece Aleph-Omega'dan itibaren her bir boyut katmanı arasında niteliksel üstünlüğe ihtiyaç duyan aleph-0 ve aleph-1 ile çalışır, eğer kozmoloji yapısından kardinalin kendisi kadar büyük bahsedilirse, kozmoloji otomatik olarak kademeyi kazanır.

In fact, it should not be scaled to Aleph-0 unless there is a qualitative advantage over a 4-dimensional dimension that has any basis in cosmology. All of the numbers in the following have a qualitative advantage compared to each other.

 

[Rakih_Elyan]

Quite accurate for a spatial dimension tiering in wiki.

 

[LuisGeno]

They should put this that way somewhere. After the explanation of how the cardinals work.

 

[lordozantr]

Bunu bir yere bu şekilde koymalılar. Kardinallerin nasıl çalıştığı anlatıldıktan sonra.

If they put the forum I wrote in an approved place on the wiki, I could explain them in detail.

 

[BasedNecoScaler69]

If they put the forum I wrote in an approved place on the wiki, I could explain them in detail.

you could request a move to staff discussion in the all purpose thread

 

[BasedNecoScaler69]

Aleph-0 is either High 3-A, 2-A or High 1-B depend on how the verse in question portray it

Aleph-1 is either Low 2-C, Low 1-C or Low 1-A depend on how the verse in question portray it

I'm not sure from Aleph-2 onward but yeah Aleph-Omega is 1-A+. Inaccessible Cardinal is baseline High 1-A and Mahlo Cardinal is baseline tier 0

aleph-2 onward would just be 1 extra dimension in cases not relating to 1-a.
eg aleph two amount of a standard low 2-c universe would be 6-d

 

[Rockysbalboa]

First of all, I don't know much about the forum, I don't know if I chose the right topic, forgive me

And what I want to say is that I noticed that not all cardinals are declared on the wiki, so there are people who are ignorant about it, the argument below is an article that will inform and explain about the rank of cardinals. Please indicate if there is an incorrect measurement.

aleph-null=High 1-B
Aleph-1=Low 1-A
Aleph-2=Baseline 1-A
Aleph-Omega=1-A+
inaccesible Cardinal= Baseline High 1-A Hyper inaccesible Cardinal=High 1-A^inf mahlo cardinal=Baseline 0
Weakly Compact Cardinal=0^inf
Ethereal Cardinal=0^inf
Ramsey Cardinal=0^inf
Woodin Cardinal=0^inf(Again, we can't fill it with infinities, I write it like this because we can't define it)
Strongly Compact=0^inf
Super Compact=0^inf
I0=0^inf
Reinhardt Cardinal=0^inf
Berkeley Cardinal=0^ the order from top to bottom is small to large, not complicated, the top gives the fewest tiers, the bottom gives the highest tier (According to the articles and sources I looked at, Woodin< strongly compact≤supercompact is listed as such)( and in another article it is stated that the cardinal axiom I0 comes after Reinhard)

Looks nice I agree

 

[KingNanaya]

yall tiering birds over here?

 

[Rockysbalboa]

aleph-2 onward would just be 1 extra dimension in cases not relating to 1-a.
eg aleph two amount of a standard low 2-c universe would be 6-d

The last revision for this subject said that Aleph 2 amount of universe = 1a

 

[Rockysbalboa]

yall tiering birds over here?

This text for me?

 

[The_forgetten]

Kuşları buraya mı getiriyorsunuz?

I don't understand what you're saying but if you deny it we can discuss it?

 

[KingNanaya]

I don't understand what you're saying but if you deny it we can discuss it?

I was trying to make a joke. Because Cardinals are also birds

 

[KingNanaya]

This text for me?

I was just saying it to say it. just a tiny joke

 

[The_forgetten]

aleph-2 sonrası, 1-a ile ilgili olmayan durumlarda sadece 1 ekstra boyut olacaktır.
örneğin aleph iki standart düşük 2-c evrenin miktarı 6-d olur

A situation like this would be valid, although if there are dimensions that complement each other and if the upper dimension negates the lower dimension, the aleph of the dimensions stacked on each other can have up to 2 attributes.Unqualified dimensions are not our subject here, as its possession would make it unattainable for all sonic and infinite dimensions.

 

[The_forgetten]

Şaka yapmaya çalışıyordum. Kardinaller de kuş olduğu için

Oh I see, sorry I couldn't understand your joke as there are many people against this issue.

 

[KingNanaya]

Oh I see, sorry I couldn't understand your joke as there are many people against this issue.

it's ok, don't worry about it

 

[The_forgetten]

Böyle bir durum geçerli olabilir, halbuki birbirini tamamlayan boyutlar varsa ve üst boyut alt boyutu olumsuzluyorsa üst üste yığılmış boyutların alefi en fazla 2 niteliğe sahip olabiliyor.

Aleph can have as many attributes as 2* which would be completely inaccessible and unreachable for dimensions both at the finite level and at the infinite level so for aleph2 it would be in the 1a proper position.

 

[Wikisource]

Ok, but can someone explain to me the following cardinal types innacesible cardinal ?

 

[The_forgetten]

Of course, let me explain now, as we know, just having an infinite layer on 1a makes you 1a+, and cardinality is also infinite consecutive numbers omega ordinals, thus infinite for 1a. It gives baseline, so it becomes 1a+, and inaccessible cardinal, this definition must be completely inaccessible and unreachable for a completely finite and infinite cardinal sequence, and in this case for aleph OMEGA Thus we get the inaccessible cardinal. An infinite hierarchy would be required that negates the level completely, which would make it h1a^inf so k-inaccesible hyper^inaccessible cardinal at level

If we take an inaccessible cardinal as a-inaccessible at the basic level, we get a hyper-expanded infinite hierarchy, since the cardinality will also be a set of k>, that is, an infinite recursion.

 

[The_forgetten]

Ok, but can someone explain to me the following cardinal types innacesible cardinal ?

Let me explain the inaccessible cardinality, first let's take aleph2 and aleph omega for this, you don't know that if there is a higher infinite sequence in a hierarchy for aleph1, this would make it N1^1 i.e. aleph2, and anyway, basically aleph2 is inaccessible for the set of all natural numbers and the set of real numbers, which shows that it has no dimensional restriction, so we give 1a. For 1a+ we need higher infinities for aleph2, which we have already obtained, for example the infinite hierarchy of aleph layer hierarchy that continues hierarchically after aleph2, aleph2,aleph3aleph4... This would give us aleph omega and infinite consecutive numbers in cardinality would give us omega ordinal which would give us infinite baseline for 1a.From here we get 1a+, Now let's come to h1a, inaccessible, the inaccessible layer is a kind of completely inaccessible and inaccessible for aleph omega and its sub-layers, we can think of it as aleph omega putting itself into an infinite self-iteration from which aleph omega and its sub-layers are completely irrelevant. for inaccessibility we can take the basic level h1a for inaccessibility now we call the basic inaccessibility a strongly and if we use a hyper set K for the set a shown in the tenel, we have K>a and so you have a hyper-extended infinite hierarchy so that k-inaccesible would give you h1a^inf

 

[BasedNecoScaler69]

The last revision for this subject said that Aleph 2 amount of universe = 1a

I think you’re confusing universe with higher amount of levels

 

[The_forgetten]

I think you’re confusing universe with higher amount of levels

If you have a problem with this revision can I discuss it with you this afternoon?

 

[Rockysbalboa]

I think you’re confusing universe with higher amount of levels

Bump

 

[Rockysbalboa]

I think you’re confusing universe with higher amount of levels

Bump ☠

 

[Georredannea15]

Bump ☠

What he means is space-time continuum of the 4-dimensional universal sized, without any qualitative superiority between them.

In short, standard space-time continua equal to number aleph 2 are equal to R^6, i.e. 6-D.

So you can say (ℵ 2) number space-time continuum = 6-D

As for the OP, if a universe or a hierarchy is as large as the cardinals listed above, then yes it scales that way.

 

[Iamunanimousinthat]

What are all these a set of? Dimensions? Universes?

 

[Barbar01]

So you can say (ℵ 2) number space-time continuum = 6-D

But DT said this is 1a in Low1a wiki wide:

And if a character destroys a space that can contain aleph_2 many 1 m^3 cubes... well, 4D space can't do it, 5D space can't do it, 6D space can't do it... the smallest space that can contain that would be one with aleph_2 many dimensions, no?

 

[Rockysbalboa]

But DT said this is 1a in Low1a wiki wide:

Obviously

 

[Georredannea15]

But DT said this is 1a in Low1a wiki wide:

DT was probably talking about here a space or universe (whatever) large as aleph 2.(Well, i guess)

Because for a space to contain something the size of aleph 2, it must be at least large as aleph 2.

 

[Barbar01]

DT was probably talking about here a space or universe (whatever) large as aleph 2.(Well, i guess)

I already send DT's said. if you want look to the full text. Look Low1a wiki wide page 2
(definitely talking about dimensionality)

 

[Georredannea15]

I already send DT's said. if you want look to the full text. Look Low1a wiki wide page 2
(definitely talking about dimensionality)

A dimensional plane equal to Aleph 2(large as aleph 2) would already be 1-A. But that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the number of universes, not their dimensional planes, dimensionalities and or their large.

 

[Barbar01]

A dimensional plane equal to Aleph 2(large as aleph 2) would already be 1-A. But that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the number of universes, not their dimensional planes, dimensionalities and or their large.

No, in the message I sent, DT says; 1 cubic metre of space as much as Aleph2 cannot fit even in a 6d space, you need a aleph2 dimensional space
Dt's Full message:

Ultima, again, you not liking my answers doesn't mean that I didn't already reply to your points.

Much of your last reply consisted of you quoting parts of your old posts, which should have been a hint towards me perhaps already given replies to those parts when I answered the old posts. Disagreement on the validity of the argument isn't the same as not addressing things.

I can gladly reply once more, but you can't expect things to get stalled indefinitely until you are happy with the outcome.

"ULTİMA'S MESSAGE"



I don't really understand your confusion regarding that point? Like, we default to the smallest structure that could contain those many things.

Like, if a character destroys a space that can contain 100 1 m^3 cubes, then we would default to that space being 100 m^3 in volume, as that's the minimum size of it.

If a character destroys a space that can contain countably infinite many 1 m^3 cubes, we would default to an infinite 3D space, as that's the smallest thing that can manage that.

If a character destroys a space that can contain aleph_1 many 1 m^3 cubes, we would default to 4D space, as that's the minimum space that could contain that many cubes.

And if a character destroys a space that can contain aleph_2 many 1 m^3 cubes... well, 4D space can't do it, 5D space can't do it, 6D space can't do it... the smallest space that can contain that would be one with aleph_2 many dimensions, no?

Or am I overlooking a space that can and is smaller than that?