-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Er Gen, Nep nature type 3 for 4th step cultivators.
- Thread starter Larssx
- Start date
- Status
- 633
- 698
- Thread starter
- #82
Why does the air does not exist in a specified place?
Are you claiming that there is no air in the atmosphere?
literally does not exist in space
but air is exist in the atmosphere.
- 1,165
- 776
if essence is stated to take up no space, then i agree with it being non existent
- 633
- 698
- Thread starter
- #85
It is literally stated like this
Then should I put you in the agree section?
- 1,165
- 776
"doesn not exist in a specified place" as in doesn't exist in a specific place, it's everywhere
that's what i meant by the analogy, it may have simply meant that essence exists everywhere and thus contains everything
- 1,165
- 776
ah if that's the case my bad
if something takes up no space then it definitely doesn't exist,
i agree
- 522
- 628
Nah man don't self-loathe, it's okay to have doubts and question everything. You're not an idiot!
- 1,165
- 776
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,232
- 2,760
It's natural for mistakes to happen where there are people. Don't worry about it too much man.
- 633
- 698
- Thread starter
- #91
Yes, but the analogy is irrelevant because in expression said that the essence contains all places but also does not exist in any specific place.
The air is limited to such things as atmosphere and nothing beyond.
So air not contain all places.
Anyway, brother, I'm not gonna deal with this any longer.
Because you've already accepted op.
Also stay motivated.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,232
- 2,760
Bro first buried him and then praised him
- 18,393
- 14,311
Your implication of state of existence has no grounds while scans don't even state that.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,232
- 2,760
Just read
- 633
- 698
- Thread starter
- #96
"its almost like it doesnt even exist."
"Has no form or shape"
"the essence does not exist in a specific place"
"Essence takes up no space"
Why do you disagree that? when there are so many extra statements that they do not exist?
We have already explained them sufficiently above
.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,232
- 2,760
- 544
- 406
"its almost like it doesnt even exist."
"Has no form or shape"
"the essence does not exist in a specific place"
"Essence takes up no space"
Why do you disagree that? when there are so many extra statements that they do not exist?
We have already explained them sufficiently above
Oh, I'm sorry, you must be so angry with me for making a joke about you to your boyfriend
- 229
- 152
Murat in my bosom Turat
- 633
- 698
- Thread starter
- #100
Oh, brother, what's your name, Dread?
- 633
- 698
- Thread starter
- #102
This already exists in the op
At least it's on the imgur link I sent.
I will still add it as a text.
- 18,393
- 14,311
Having no shape or form does not sounds like any paradoxical means.
God has no eyes but can see everything does not indicate anything complicated. It simply means he can see without eyes. Makes sense? Perhaps, within our logical terms, it does not but that's theological means.
Explaining it without any additional context won't help the case.
Don't see any relevance to the conversation.Oh, I'm sorry, you must be so angry with me for making a joke about you to your boyfriend
- 633
- 698
- Thread starter
- #104
Irrelevant because I use "no form or shape" and "contains all forms and shapes"
The example you should give
It would lead to something absurd like God has no eyes, but he has eyes, in which case he would again be in a paradoxical situation.
And this is not the only scene where we give an example of non existence.
""its almost like it doesnt even exist."
"the essence does not exist in a specific place"
"Essence takes up no space"
You completely ignore them
- 18,393
- 14,311
Your counter-argument that it leads to absurd while your example is already absurd to some extent is kinda not counter.
- 633
- 698
- Thread starter
- #106
What I mean by absurd is that it's a paradoxical thing.
And the example you give is your own nonsense
The example you should have given is that God has no a but has a, and this will be something paradoxical
But you used an example like God has no a and has b.
You're the one making the topic irrelevant
Also, you still didnt answer 3 example.
And the example you give is your own nonsense
The example you should have given is that God has no a but has a, and this will be something paradoxical
But you used an example like God has no a and has b.
You're the one making the topic irrelevant
Also, you still didnt answer 3 example.
- 18,393
- 14,311
I don't see how it is paradoxical. The context behind the example is the same as yours but simply in other context. The outcome of statement is tends to say he has vision.
- 633
- 698
- Thread starter
- #108
And again you just reject something and cannot even give a logical reason
Also still continue to ignore examples
Gj Dread.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,232
- 2,760
Yes, let's agree to disagree because both of you have been going round in circles on this issue. Let's let the staff decide.
- 18,393
- 14,311
The statement is not logical. So no need to throw me with logical reasons.
Everyone interpret it differently.
- 18,393
- 14,311
It's not explicit, so no. It's not really clear.
- 18,393
- 14,311
I think you miss a point; majority does not equate correctness. So you are not really here countering any points.
Sure you can wait, but you are the one who asked me and quoted me. So no need to get passive aggressive here.
Sure you can wait, but you are the one who asked me and quoted me. So no need to get passive aggressive here.
- 633
- 698
- Thread starter
- #115
I didn't claim it was like that.
I am calm, I think you misunderstood
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,232
- 2,760
His point is that you interpret it differently while everyone else has no problem. One person's personal opinion doesn't really matter unless you're DT or Ultima.
- 10,291
- 17,316
Residing in a state that exists as nothing but contains everything that you're supposedly nothing of would be considered as paradoxical since you can't be nonexistent and existent at that same time, on the same level, as the same property without being paradoxical, that's definitively what paradoxical means.
I agree with the thread.
I agree with the thread.
Rakih_Elyan
He/Him- 3,937
- 2,761
A shame that Zara and Plank will recreate Er Gen profile in the future.
TheGreatJedi13
Username Only- 5,018
- 3,191
why is that a shame?
- 19,662
- 16,005
What are the arguments?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
