• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Alright time for another batch of verses to nuke (If I don't note who to contact for revising then the verse only has inactive supporters):

Vaguest description for 9-B I've ever seen tbh, like changing weight to cause powerful blows tells us nothing and it lacks scans
@Phoenks could try revising the verse I suppose

I'd honestly rather die than read through that manga LMAO

I'm an opponent, aren't I?

anyways you should delete it, they are VERY inaccurate in many ways on top of being sub-par.
 
It seems like all of the suggestions except for Wolf's Rain can be removed based on the above feedback.
 
Thank you for helping out and taking the time to handle the process in a proper manner.
 
i request the deletion of

flapple.

I fused it with this page

The appletun page needs to be renamed to "Applin"
it should also redirect to Flapple and Appletun
 
That seems fine to me. Is somebody here willing to handle it please?
 
Yeah, and whether we allow a certain YouTube series or not (and how they'd be structured if we allowed them) is still under contention.
 
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Stellaris

Unfortunately the profiles are not very good. Sourceless and wildly over-exaggerated (fleets are listed at High 4-C despite a world-cracking ship being a titanic undertaking for the most part, and even that requires significant charge-up). Love the verse but the pages are utter ass.
 
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Stellaris

Unfortunately the profiles are not very good. Sourceless and wildly over-exaggerated (fleets are listed at High 4-C despite a world-cracking ship being a titanic undertaking for the most part, and even that requires significant charge-up). Love the verse but the pages are utter ass.
Fleets are High 4-C due to them being strong enough to kill the Dimensional Horror. Also, with the new dlc, you can turn stars into black holes with a single ship, though it does require a charge up, and it also to be noted that this ship is late game. I can potentially help add sources, but i'm not sure how helpful I can be in that regard.

@Elizhaa @ShrekAlmighty @Edenstar @InfiniteDay

Would any of you be willing and able to improve on the reliability for this verse?
I'll see what I can do.
 
Fleets are High 4-C due to them being strong enough to kill the Dimensional Horror. Also, with the new dlc, you can turn stars into black holes with a single ship, though it does require a charge up, and it also to be noted that this ship is late game. I can potentially help add sources, but i'm not sure how helpful I can be in that regard.


I'll see what I can do.
I'm aware, but Dimensional Horror's High 4-C rating is also ass.

5-B is an extremely high-end feat in-verse. I do know about the Star Eaters, though that's in the same boat as Colossus in that it isn't really a normal ass attack and thus wouldn't scale.
 
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Superboy_(Post-Flashpoint)?so=search


Blatantly terrible. Remaking it from scratch it far better and I am nearly done with his remake.


Also really bad. I am remaking him after Superboy and it's better to start with a blank slate.
 
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Superboy_(Post-Flashpoint)?so=search


Blatantly terrible. Remaking it from scratch it far better and I am nearly done with his remake.


Also really bad. I am remaking him after Superboy and it's better to start with a blank slate.
Lmao multi city block wtf is this
 
Last edited:
Poor state verse, multiple ratings don't have solid backing behind them and so on
@Colonel_Krukov could try revising it
 
i request the deletion of

flapple.

I fused it with this page

The appletun page needs to be renamed to "Applin"
it should also redirect to Flapple and Appletun
You shouldn’t have fused em at all. They’re two different Pokémon.
 
You shouldn’t have fused em at all. They’re two different Pokémon.
nope, they are the evolution of a single pokemon.
Applin evolves into either Flapple or that other fat one i forgot the name of rn.
They come from the same pokemon and they have g-max variants that look exactly the same. It's the same pokemon except they went through slightly different evolutionary routes. It's like how Goku SSJ and Goku UI aren't the same thing but they are still Goku.
 
nope, they are the evolution of a single pokemon.
Applin evolves into either Flapple or that other fat one i forgot the name of rn.
They come from the same pokemon and they have g-max variants that look exactly the same. It's the same pokemon except they went through slightly different evolutionary routes. It's like how Goku SSJ and Goku UI aren't the same thing but they are still Goku.
Yeah and Tyrogue evolves into all three Hitmons. Kirlia evolves into Gardevoir or Gallade. They’re objectively two separate Pokémon. And Goku is a totally different case. Like the most false equivalency of all false equivalencies. You’re comparing an individual to a species.
 
Yeah and Tyrogue evolves into all three Hitmons. Kirlia evolves into Gardevoir or Gallade. They’re objectively two separate Pokémon. And Goku is a totally different case. Like the most false equivalency of all false equivalencies. You’re comparing an individual to a species.
i've already fused the gardevoir line and was planning to fuse the tyrogue line. They come from the same pokemon and they share like 80% of their overall movepool with each other with like 5 moves in difference. Heck, even the breeding moves are the same. Saying they're not the same pokemon is objectively wrong and if you say that then we might as well make a separate page for every pre-evolution and have like 600 profiles.
Oh and btw this was accepted in a revision i made, the fusing of profiles i mean.
Additionally this does what the wiki wants - lowering the amount of unnecessary profiles to avoid cluttering.
Having two pokemon that come from the same pokemon in one profile is more than reasonable and definitely more reasonable than having a separate profile for each of its forms and thus making 3 profiles out of one species with a split end of an evolutionary line.
 
You did what? Let me get this straight. You fused the male only Gallade line with the line where all notable examples of its species are female.

where’s this thread you made? I have to comment.
nvm i didn't bring up gardevoir there.
Either way it isn't a male only line. Gallade is male only, however it's pre-evolutions aren't. You either split the profile into two and have gallade have it's pre-evos but then we'd have two profiles for ralts and kirlia, you either make it like it was before and have Gallade be a solitary profile with Gardevoir having the pre-evos, which is stupid because Ralts and Kirlia don't always make a gardevoir, they can just as well be a gallade in the end. The best option is having the two profiles fused.
Also "notable examples" is bullsh-t since Gardevoir is 50/50 male to female ratio.
 
nvm i didn't bring up gardevoir there.
Either way it isn't a male only line. Gallade is male only, however it's pre-evolutions aren't. You either split the profile into two and have gallade have it's pre-evos but then we'd have two profiles for ralts and kirlia, you either make it like it was before and have Gallade be a solitary profile with Gardevoir having the pre-evos, which is stupid because Ralts and Kirlia don't always make a gardevoir, they can just as well be a gallade in the end. The best option is having the two profiles fused.
Also "notable examples" is bullsh-t since Gardevoir is 50/50 male to female ratio.
The way it was before was perfect. Heck when both profiles were made it didn’t have Ralts and Kirlia on it, as the profiles were just Gardevoir and Gallade with the abilities of them. Frankly I hate how the current Pokémon profiles are formatted. It satisfies the 10% who are looking up Charmander as opposed to the 90% who are looking up Charizard. With a handful of exceptions (Pikachu, Jigglypuff, Bidoof, Braixen, etc.) people are looking up the final forms, and how our profiles are made nowadays, they’ll get the first forms. At best they’ll get a profile named a final form but has the first form’s image as the header. But I digress.
Two totally different evolutions get two totally different profiles. It’s like making chimps and humans the same because common ancestor. Flapple is not Appletun, Gardevoir is not Gallade, Glailie is not Froslass, etcetera. And yes, every notable Gardevoir in the franchise is female. The only one that wasn’t was Wally’s, and that got retconned to a Gallade.
 
The way it was before was perfect. Heck when both profiles were made it didn’t have Ralts and Kirlia on it, as the profiles were just Gardevoir and Gallade with the abilities of them. Frankly I hate how the current Pokémon profiles are formatted. It satisfies the 10% who are looking up Charmander as opposed to the 90% who are looking up Charizard. With a handful of exceptions (Pikachu, Jigglypuff, Bidoof, Braixen, etc.) people are looking up the final forms, and how our profiles are made nowadays, they’ll get the first forms. At best they’ll get a profile named a final form but has the first form’s image as the header. But I digress.
that is a you problem and i am currently working on adding pre-evos to whatever
Two totally different evolutions get two totally different profiles. It’s like making chimps and humans the same because common ancestor. Flapple is not Appletun, Gardevoir is not Gallade, Glailie is not Froslass, etcetera.
Except a human doesn't start as a chimp, they are born as a human. Yet again, not the same thing. Flapple is applin evolved with one apple and Appletun is applin evolved with another apple, big deal, totally chimp>human difference. Uh-huh. A green worm that ate a different plant and ended up turning into a slightly different pokemon while maintaining the exact same g-max form with just one different move. Gardevoir is not Gallade, but Kirlia can be a Gallade. Yet again, nothing chimp and human about this, more like whether a kid wants to grow up to be a veterenarian or a pedeatrician. Same goes for glalie.
If you want to go back to old split profiles that literally have the exact same abilities copy pasted just with different stats and maybe one extra ability, then go to some other place. People voted for fusion of profiles, i did it. People didn't complain...except for you of course.
And yes, every notable Gardevoir in the franchise is female. The only one that wasn’t was Wally’s, and that got retconned to a Gallade.
nobody cares. If people like keeping female tarantulas than male tarantulas doesn't mean we should categorize them separately.
 
I have to agree with Arceus0x here, they're species profiles, and so we should just list a entire evolutionary line in a single page, it isn't like Digimon where evolved forms exclusive to a single form aren't too common, in fact we've yet to see a case of two Pokémon being capable of evolving into a single species (closest is Flapple and Appletun sharing a G-Max form, which is temporary anyways), so Cal's arguments are bad.
Let alone how redirect links are also being done so anyone can look up "Espeon" and just be redirected to Eevee, for instance.
 
Last edited:








Stats all pretty much just scale to the player, pretty redundant. Matt makes sense because he’s physically superior but all of this lots abilities and stats can just be found on the Player’s page and they have little to 0 notability to justify being there on fame alone.
 
Poor state verse, multiple ratings don't have solid backing behind them and so on
@Colonel_Krukov could try revising it
Bump, am I allowed to nuke this?

Also adding this:
Poor state verse, no scans and multiple stats seem to just be lazily put on it and so on
I contacted the man who made the pages to improve them a month ago and they did nothing so
 

This entire verse should probably be removed. No scans or justification for most things aside from some AP stuff. A6colute is no longer active and idk who else have ever worked on these. But either way, bad.
 
Back
Top