• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Page Deletion Requests Thread (New forum)

Yes, thank you for helping out.
 
Only supporter has last been active 2 years ago and the only scan on the pages is a private YouTube video

Only supporter has been last active last year, and otherwise the verse doesn't have a calc for tier 8 physicals or scans in general and seems to have circular scaling

No supporters and outside one rating for one page it all relies on none calced feats without scans for anything

Also no supporters, and while it has calcs they are Naruto Forum ones and the speed calc uses the strength of shockwaves to get speed which we just don't do

Doesn't even have profiles

No supporters, mountain rating comes from splitting a mountain, no scans and in general pages don't seem that good

No supporters, 9-B rating is pulled out of nowhere and no scans

So yah can I nuke all of this?
 
Only supporter has last been active 2 years ago and the only scan on the pages is a private YouTube video
Was thinking I might try to revise this someday, it's a notable-ish game verse and it shouldn't be too hard since the game is like 40 min
 
Is it fine if Tllmbrg deletes his other listed unreliable pages then?
 
Last edited:
They can probably be deleted as well. Is somebody here willing to handle it please?
 




None of these follow properly the Standard Team Profiles Format, not to mention most of these are better stated as organization and better suited for a modified Civilization format
 
I'll delete the stuff people don't plan on revising then
Alright all the other pages have been deleted
Thank you for helping out. Please be careful to always remember to remove all regular VSB wiki links to the deleted pages as well. You have not always done this in the past.
 




None of these follow properly the Standard Team Profiles Format, not to mention most of these are better stated as organization and better suited for a modified Civilization format
@RoTt35
 




None of these follow properly the Standard Team Profiles Format, not to mention most of these are better stated as organization and better suited for a modified Civilization format
I have nothing to do with the ASOIAF profiles, @Hakim is the one who does them, I only do Game of Thrones ones
@Hakim
 
Are you willing to handle it please?
I'm willing to do so, but I need to find their feats first especially considering that they have considerable numbers of feats and haxes, such as Jackie Chan uses everything in battlefield to fight and I may list them all. In a word, it takes time. The references for quote added by me in their profiles are just the first step of revision.
 
Okay. No problem.
 
He seems to appear in the 2004 Punisher movie so
 
Yeah he was like, the main antagonist in that iirc
I don't think he was the main villain (iirc that was Howard Saint), but he was certainly one of the villains, and he got a brutal beating.
 
Last edited:
So, I've been told that some profiles deleted here which had supporters weren't asked if they are willing to fix them before deletion was enacted. I know most of the talk is done here if a profile is to be deleted for having bad statistics, no scans or references, blogs or calcs...but I think first the supporter(s) should be pinged and asked on their wall if they will fix the profiles...and likely 2-3 days period to let them respond before any action is taken on deletion - this should be a standard. If there are no supporters then look at History and see who created the profile...or who edited it a lot and maybe they are knowledgeable. Of course, if no active supporter or the like can be found, delete it without the waiting period. This is not applicable to troll or absurd profiles like what I deleted a few days ago (Tier 0 profile based on a Reddit short story with pictures from Hollow Knight).

Basically, tag and send a message on the wall of the supporter/creator of the profile(s) and wait 2-3 days before an action is taken.
 
So, I've been told that some profiles deleted here which had supporters weren't asked if they are willing to fix them before deletion was enacted. I know most of the talk is done here if a profile is to be deleted for having bad statistics, no scans or references, blogs or calcs...but I think first the supporter(s) should be pinged and asked on their wall if they will fix the profiles...and likely 2-3 days period to let them respond before any action is taken on deletion - this should be a standard. If there are no supporters then look at History and see who created the profile...or who edited it a lot and maybe they are knowledgeable. Of course, if no active supporter or the like can be found, delete it without the waiting period. This is not applicable to troll or absurd profiles like what I deleted a few days ago (Tier 0 profile based on a Reddit short story with pictures from Hollow Knight).

Basically, tag and send a message on the wall of the supporter/creator of the profile(s) and wait 2-3 days before an action is taken.
I agree with this.

Everybody here, please keep this in mind.
 
honestly i feel it should be a rule to tag people about the profiles they made, unless they're inactive
 
That may be impractical if the pages are very outdated and badly crafted, but it should definitely be heavily encouraged.

Should we mention it in the first post of this thread?
 
Yes, something like "Before the deletion of a page or verse, the creators of the page or, failing that, other, active supporters of it, should be tagged in this thread to ask their opinion."
 
Yes, that could work. What do the rest of you think?
 
I think it works out fine, getting others page deleted without their knowledge could cause something heated unless they're inactive
 
This has been getting on my nerves for a decent while, but Squid Game as the current batch of files is, needs to be deleted.

Not ONLY are all of these extremely unnotable characters with no extraordinary stats, they mostly don't even fight, not enough to even be considered action. The only things in Squid Game capable of getting files MAYBE, are the traps, and that as location files. Nothing else adds anything from a Vs. Debating sense.
 
Back
Top