Bleach Formatting

[Arc7Kuroi]

Cant say I remember.

 

[LordTracer]

I’m pretty sure it’s from 5x the 7-A+ calc

 

[OneBleachHurricane]

I've seem to have found the values

7-A+ - 906.24 Megatons - Shikai

6-C - 4.5312 Gigatons - Bankai

6-C - 22.656 Gigatons - Bankai X Hollowfication

 

[OneBleachHurricane]

The only profiles that seem to have "Likely 6-C" are SS Arc Ichigo, Zaraki, and Tosen.

 

[LordTracer]

This seems to be the only gripe with the suggested profile clean up, everything else is supposedly fine.

Btw if nobody has any problems with the rest of the OP, I can go ahead and edit those.

 

[LordTracer]

The only profiles that seem to have "Likely 6-C" are SS Arc Ichigo, Zaraki, and Tosen.

And Byakuya.

 

[OneBleachHurricane]

What was the reason for them having "Likely 6-C"?

 

[Antvasima]

@DemonGodMitchAubin

Can you summarise the issue of content here?

 

[LordTracer]

What was the reason for them having "Likely 6-C"?

I think it’s because Kenpachi forced Sajin to use his Bankai and was about to fight it, and everyone else scales to Kenpachi.

 

[Arc7Kuroi]

@DemonGodMitchAubin

Can you summarise the issue of content here?

"Putting 6-C twice is redundant, and it should be changed to “7-A, likely 6-C, higher with Bankai, even higher with Hollowfication.”

Hard Disagree with this

Above, it would mean that the Bankai and Hollowfication are unquanitifably above "7-A, likely 6-C" and are not fully 6-C

This is all Mitch has said, the rest has been him sticking to it.

 

[Antvasima]

Well, it doesn't seem like a very big deal, but he does have a valid point. It doesn't hurt to try to avoid misunderstandings.

 

[OneBleachHurricane]

I think it’s because Kenpachi forced Sajin to use his Bankai and was about to fight it, and everyone else scales to Kenpachi.

So their Likely 6-C Value is:

4.5312 Gigatons - Bankai

 

[LordTracer]

So their Likely 6-C Value is:

4.5312 Gigatons - Bankai

Yeah, I think so.

 

[LordTracer]

Well, it doesn't seem like a very big deal, but he does have a valid point. It doesn't hurt to try to avoid misunderstandings.

But like I said, there won’t be an understanding if people just read the AP description. Cause the Bankai rating is a solid multiplier, it’s impossible for people to interpret it as being “unquantifiably above 7-A+” unless they just don’t read the Attack Potency section (and if they don’t read that, it’s kinda their fault at that point)

 

[OneBleachHurricane]

This is just for Post-Bankai Training Ichigo

His Regular Statistics

7-A+ - 906.24 Megatons - Shikai

6-C - 4.5312 Gigatons - Bankai

6-C - 22.656 Gigatons - Bankai X Hollowfication

His Likely Statistics

6-C - 4.5312 Gigatons - Shikai

6-C - 22.656 Gigatons - Bankai

High 6-C - 113.28 Gigatons - Bankai X Hollowfication

 

[Arc7Kuroi]

I’m pretty sure we plainly scale his Bankai to 22.65 Gigatons as per the notes page on Bleach’s page indicates.

 

[OneBleachHurricane]

I’m pretty sure we plainly scale his Bankai to 22.65 Gigatons as per the notes page on Bleach’s page indicates.

• Characters that are Island level from Arrancar Arc is 22.65 Gigatons

 

[Arc7Kuroi]

Yes I don’t remember if we simply upscale his beginning of AA Bankai to that value or if we rate his beginning of AA Bankai as = to his SS Arc Bankai.

 

[Antvasima]

But like I said, there won’t be an understanding if people just read the AP description. Cause the Bankai rating is a solid multiplier, it’s impossible for people to interpret it as being “unquantifiably above 7-A+” unless they just don’t read the Attack Potency section (and if they don’t read that, it’s kinda their fault at that point)

Okay. Never mind. Your version is probably fine then.

 

[DemonGodMitchAubin]

Okay. Never mind. Your version is probably fine then.

I mean his version is wrong, but sure, he can do whatever he wants

 

[Arc7Kuroi]

I’m fairly certain Mitch is right on technicality with how things our formatted on wiki.

 

[DemonGodMitchAubin]

Imma leave now, I've said my piece, it's up to y'all if you want to take my advice or not

 

[Antvasima]

I’m fairly certain Mitch is right on technicality with how things our formatted on wiki.

Okay. We should use his version then. My apologies. I am exhausted.

 

[Arc7Kuroi]

Don’t worry about it bro!

 

[LordTracer]

I’m fairly certain Mitch is right on technicality with how things our formatted on wiki.

Not really, we don’t put the same tier twice in one key unless one of them is a + rating, and even then it’s usually just done as a “higher” rating.

 

[Antvasima]

I do not remember so well, and am very tired, but can ask a few other staff members for input.

@DemonGodMitchAubin

Are you willing to summarise your views about this issue for them to evaluate please?

 

[LordTracer]

I asked Damage to evaluate a while ago, but ig he hasn’t gotten around to it yet.

 

[Antvasima]

I asked Damage to evaluate a while ago, but ig he hasn’t gotten around to it yet.

Okay.

@Damage3245

Would you be willing to help out here please?

 

[Damage3245]

Does everything in the OP need commenting on or have some parts been accepted without issue?

 

[LordTracer]

Does everything in the OP need commenting on or have some parts been accepted without issue?

Just the formatting of Bankai Ichigo. Mitch things it should stay as normal, I think it should be changed as I mentioned in the OP.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for helping out Damage.

 

[Cyberblader90]

how goes it

 

[Arc7Kuroi]

Good how are you

 

[Antvasima]

Can somebody summarise what currently needs to be done here and who agrees with what please?

 

[Arc7Kuroi]

Does everything in the OP need commenting on or have some parts been accepted without issue?

"Putting 6-C twice is redundant, and it should be changed to “7-A, likely 6-C, higher with Bankai, even higher with Hollowfication.”

Hard Disagree with this

Above, it would mean that the Bankai and Hollowfication are unquanitifably above "7-A, likely 6-C" and are not fully 6-C

Everything else is allegedly fine

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. We should use what our usual wiki standard formatting is for that type of situation then, likely what Mitch mentioned earlier.

The rest of what has been accepted can probably be applied.

 

[LordTracer]

I’m pretty sure that my suggestion is the usual wiki formatting though. As far as I can tell, we don’t put the same tier next to each other in the same key unless one of them is a + rating.

I’ll go ahead and apply everything else.

 

[Antvasima]

From what I recall, that seems correct, but I am rather bad at keeping track.

What do you think @Damage3245 ?

 

[LordTracer]

Actually I need Ichigo Kurosaki (Post-Timeskip) to be unlocked.

 

[Damage3245]

We do put the same tier next to each other in the same key I believe.

This current one:

“7-A, likely 6-C, 6-C with Bankai, higher with Hollowfication.”

Seems fine to me.