-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
A stupid question
- Thread starter Orange
- Start date
- 3,417
- 2,500
What do you mean?
See a 11-D by the same way that we see a 4D? If that's it, then maybe 10-D (if those dimensions are infinitely superior to each other)
See a 11-D by the same way a 11-D sees a 4-D? If that's it, then maybe 18-D or something like that (again, if those higher dimensions are infinitely superior to each other)
See a 11-D by the same way that we see a 4D? If that's it, then maybe 10-D (if those dimensions are infinitely superior to each other)
See a 11-D by the same way a 11-D sees a 4-D? If that's it, then maybe 18-D or something like that (again, if those higher dimensions are infinitely superior to each other)
- 3,417
- 2,500
I supose you meant that you see 11-D as 11-D sees 4-D, so, at most 18-D ig
- 3,323
- 1,867
that's not how dimensionality works, maybe the person has sight issues or somethin
but somehow I don't even doubt some fictional author actually made that-
but somehow I don't even doubt some fictional author actually made that-
- 3,417
- 2,500
I mean, if you trascend a 11-D by the same way a 11-D trascends a 4-D, it should be 18-D, shouldn't it?
Last edited:
- 3,323
- 1,867
By wiki logic, yes, but you wouldn't see 11-D stuff as 4-D
You would see 11-D stuff as... 11-D
Not to the same degree, of course, but it is like saying we see a straight line (1D) as a dot (0D) since we are so far above it, as 3D beings
It makes just as much sense-
- 3,323
- 1,867
Nah. They (supposedly) see them as fiction, but it is a very different thing than seeing someone of X dimensions as having less.
azontr
Any/All- 42,033
- 51,136
Probably both.
- 3,708
- 1,759
- Thread starter
- #13
azontr
Any/All- 42,033
- 51,136
...........
take that back-
two can play it that game *****-But in all seriousness, this makes no sense lol.
- 3,323
- 1,867
No, we see 2D as fiction because we are 3D. To us, 2D, 1D, 0D are all fiction, but a 2D being would see 1D and 0D as fiction, and so on. We do not equalize 2D as being 1D, despite both looking like fiction.
A 18D being would see both 11D and 4D as fiction, but the shape would be clearly different.
I mean, again, we see straight lines as different to dots.
- 7,828
- 11,781
That's a bit rude...
How lower dimensions are interpreted/visualized is up to the author. There's a lot of ways to interpret this.
Based on the original question, 10-D would be the most relatable since we're 3-D and view 4-D as 4-D.
Based on the clarified question, I think what they're going for is 18-D.
It is not the right answer though. The layers of infinity don't add, they compound. The difference between 18-D and 11-D is much larger than the difference between 11-D and 4-D.
Similar threads
