• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

is this immeasurable

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
9,316
Reaction score
3,439
is shattering a whole in the space time continuum with your kinetic energy with sheer speed causing a portal to open up so you can time travel immeasurable?
 
Kinda confused on what we're talking about. I think for this to be answered you'll need to provide examples or give give the question more refined speech.
 
why would it be mftl speed
Because if the action is "shattering a whole in the space time continuum with your kinetic energy with sheer speed", then the kinetic energy needed to be produced would be MFTL. I havent been using this website for long, so Im not sure if there's a higher "term" than MTFL, what whatever would equate to the speed required to do that, tada there's your measurment.

Like I said before tho, Im un-aware of what we're talking about and I'd have to see what this is a reference to be 100% accurate with my statements, so take them with a pinch of salt.
 
Which isn't giving any feat of speed at all.
There's no definite speed minimum to do so.
I mean isn't he still just time traveling with speed?

Because if the action is "shattering a whole in the space time continuum with your kinetic energy with sheer speed", then the kinetic energy needed to be produced would be MFTL. I havent been using this website for long, so Im not sure if there's a higher "term" than MTFL, what whatever would equate to the speed required to do that, tada there's your measurment.

Like I said before tho, Im un-aware of what we're talking about and I'd have to see what this is a reference to be 100% accurate with my statements, so take them with a pinch of salt.
you literally cannot calc ftl kinetic energy
it's just impossible
light speed is the speed limit of the universe
 
I mean isn't he still just time traveling with speed?


you literally cannot calc ftl kinetic energy
it's just impossible
light speed is the speed limit of the universe
That is incorrect.
The speed of light is the measurement of well, that light travels. Being faster than it just means if you move say 100 meters faster than light, those 100 meters will look delayed for people who's sight is not faster than light. Light is just the limit of our defined perception as Humans.
 
That is incorrect.
The speed of light is the measurement of well, that light travels. Being faster than it just means if you move say 100 meters faster than light, those 100 meters will look delayed for people who's sight is not faster than light. Light is just the limit of our defined perception as Humans.
The speed of light is infinite energy within itself Anything faster than that
You can't calc it
once you reach light speed your mass and energy become infinite. its literally on our page

"No kinetic energy for faster than light speeds: Kinetic energy calculated for faster than light objects, or more precise for objects for which {\displaystyle v\geq 299792458m/s}, is not considered legitimate. That is because the kinetic energy of an object, using the correct physical description through relativistic mechanics, would require infinite energy to reach the speed of light, and for objects above the speed of light the equations wouldn't return real values. Since the energy would approach infinity towards the speed of light it also isn't allowed to use relativistic speed as an approximation for the kinetic energy of faster than light objects, since by using an approximation close enough to the speed of light any given value could be reached through that method."
 
"you cant calc it"
Energy wise yes. Speed wise? You can.
"exactly 299,792,458 meters per second by definition"
It has a number. Energy wise we cant calc it through normal means, if you wanna bring up physics, because we cannot realistically get to that barrier.
As an example;
"To summarize, according to the immutable laws of physics (specifically, Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity), there's no way to reach or exceed the speed of light."

HOWEVER, we clearly have people who can go faster than the speed of light, therefore that whole argument of "oh you cant measure it" is irrelevant.
 
Nope, no definite speed for that, you need to move through time like a spatial dimension, not create a means to travel due to AP/KE, that's just the setting.
 
"you cant calc it"
Energy wise yes. Speed wise? You can.
"exactly 299,792,458 meters per second by definition"
It has a number. Energy wise we cant calc it through normal means, if you wanna bring up physics, because we cannot realistically get to that barrier.
As an example;
"To summarize, according to the immutable laws of physics (specifically, Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity), there's no way to reach or exceed the speed of light."

HOWEVER, we clearly have people who can go faster than the speed of light, therefore that whole argument of "oh you cant measure it" is irrelevant.
yea like clearly KE doesn't work the same, like KE doesn't work the same in fiction that's like the point. it can be calced in fiction cuz they use it differently. ur
trying to apply reality to fiction and say it can be calced because people in fiction do it.
Nope, no definite speed for that, you need to move through time like a spatial dimension, not create a means to travel due to AP/KE, that's just the setting.
actually i agree to this
 
yea like clearly KE doesn't work the same, like KE doesn't work the same in fiction that's like the point. it can be calced in fiction cuz they use it differently. ur
trying to apply reality to fiction and say it can be calced because people in fiction do it.

actually i agree to this
Like I said prior, I need to see an example of this feat happening. Its hard for me to imagine because theres plenty of theoretical speeds that can open a portal, like someone else stated prior,
There's no definite speed minimum to do so.
You could technically "create a portal with speed" depending on who you are.
the original statement being ->
is shattering a whole in the space time continuum with your kinetic energy with sheer speed causing a portal to open up so you can time travel immeasurable?
The best way I could give this a proper answer is how is he doing it with speed? Is the time travel forwards or backwards? Because thinking about it, You could just take the Back To The Future's car as an example. It "drives" through time forwards and back, I dont see how this would be any different in that case except for some reason you're taking the theoretical concept of the space-time continuum and ripping a theoretical hole in that case then.
 
Yeah, this isn't a speed feat, but an AP feat.
 
The first one is an ap feat abd the portal one has no minimum speed requirements so unless the Verse treats the portal creation via speed as something special scaling vise or in some other way it won't be immeasurable speed
 
I'm curious, what AP would this grant? It doesn't seem like a quantifiable AP feat buy more like space time hax
 
Is unquantifiable AP since it is explicitly caused by KE, but still AP, although also spacetime has as a aside effect
 
How do you calculate destroying a 4-dimensional construct? Idk, I saw some random ass CRT about being able to calc higher dimensional bulldick, maybe I'm just stupid. :/
 
The most generous thing I can give speed wise would just be baseline FTL, but as said above "Generous" being a key word and likely an understatement. And yeah, destroying 4-D stuff cannot be calculated traditionally.
 
Now if it was something like breaking out of the bounds of space-time and moving out side of it through sheer speed than that might qualify for immeasurable speed but I could be wrong
 
Now if it was something like breaking out of the bounds of space-time and moving out side of it through sheer speed than that might qualify for immeasurable speed but I could be wrong
That'd be immeasurable I think yeah
 
Now if it was something like breaking out of the bounds of space-time and moving out side of it through sheer speed than that might qualify for immeasurable speed but I could be wrong
That isn't immeasurable afaik
 
Not anymore, moving outside of linear time grants nothing anymore
Immeasurable Movement beyond linear time. This is why the speed cannot be measured. Given that S = D/T, if T is undefined the speed formula cannot be applied. This is the same reason why multiple temporal dimensions also grant immeasurable speed.

This is the standard for immeasurable speed, correct? It says movement beyond linear time, so that's how it is. Unless the standard was changed and nobody updated the speed page.
 
Immeasurable Movement beyond linear time. This is why the speed cannot be measured. Given that S = D/T, if T is undefined the speed formula cannot be applied. This is the same reason why multiple temporal dimensions also grant immeasurable speed.

This is the standard for immeasurable speed, correct? It says movement beyond linear time, so that's how it is. Unless the standard was changed and nobody updated the speed page.
The standard was change a long time ago.
 
In order to be immeasurable, you need to view time as a spatial dimension. For instance, moving through time through sheer speed. Or for instance, Character A can walk from the 1990s to the medieval era by simply moving like how someone would walk from point A to point B, through sheer speed alone and no hax. That is immeasurable speed.
 
Tbh Immeasurable speed is one of the biggest errors on the site, so the fact that it makes less sense overtime is natural.
 
Immeasurable Movement beyond linear time. This is why the speed cannot be measured. Given that S = D/T, if T is undefined the speed formula cannot be applied. This is the same reason why multiple temporal dimensions also grant immeasurable speed.

This is the standard for immeasurable speed, correct? It says movement beyond linear time, so that's how it is. Unless the standard was changed and nobody updated the speed page.
Some characters like Dantes still has immeasurable speed for moving out of linear time so immeasurable speed is just a mess at this point
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top