- 11,384
- 2,530
So....if a person could manipulate how something functions (For example Relativity or Yin and Yang)...would it be considered as manipulating a concept or manipulating a law?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eh? So it just depends on what the theory is in general?Do you mean manipulating the concept of Relativity or the concept of Yin and Yang?
Because the way you phrased you're question makes it seem as if it's just manipulating the knowledge and information regarding the concept Relativity or the concept of Yin and Yang.
No you specifically stated "Manipulate a Specific Theory" which just means manipulating the knowledge and information regarding the concept.Eh? So it just depends on what the theory is in general?
So it's a a high level of information manipulation? Like the information that generally make up reality?No you specifically stated "Manipulate a Specific Theory" which just means manipulating the knowledge and information regarding the concept.
If anything it may be just Information Manipulation?
So why would it be more likely concept manipulation then law manipulation? Because it seems to have very blatant differences.If you mean theory like I think you mean, it would depend on more context but it would most likely be concept manip from that
I don't think so, it's just manipulating the theory or the knowledge and information intended to explain the concept and not the concept itself.So it's a a high level of information manipulation? Like the information that generally make up reality?
I mean the ones that change all information on a universal scale.I don't think so, it's just manipulating the theory or the knowledge and information intended to explain the concept and not the concept itself.
It would just change the information and knowledge within the theory on a global scale to whatever you want it to be.
I'd guess it would be like changing any and all information (Mental information, Written information, Digital information) people have about the thing you want changed
I'm pretty sure great sage is talking about the theory in the sense of laws that define reality with the specification of theories of relativity and ying and yang. The specific part was just seems to be mainly about a theory in particularI don't think so, it's just manipulating the theory or the knowledge and information intended to explain the concept and not the concept itself.
It would just change the information and knowledge within the theory on a global scale to whatever you want it to be.
I'd guess it would be like changing any and all information (Mental information, Written information, Digital information) people have about the thing you want changed
YesI'm pretty sure great sage is talking about the theory in the sense of laws that define reality with the specification of theories of relativity and ying and yang. The specific part was just seems to be mainly about a theory in particular
Tbf it seems likely to be a mix of the 2.So then yeah it seems like law manip
So by manipulating a "theory" you actually meant manipulating how physics, reality, or a concept functions?
Actually physics, reality, and a concept's functionsSo by manipulating a "theory" you actually meant manipulating how physics, reality, or a concept functions?
Actually physics, reality, and a concept's functions
Just a suggestion on the terms and phrasing you useSo....if a person could manipulate how something functions (For example Relativity or Yin-Yang)...would it be considered as manipulating a concept or manipulating a law?
Eh?Just a suggestion on the terms and phrasing you use
Hmm...most likely.then law with a bit of concept mixed in
I think they were trying to say that the conclusion I reached was just a suggestion based on based on the terms and phrasing that you used
A suggestion to change the words and phrasing in your OP
Oh okay my bad ^^llA suggestion to change the words and phrasing in your OP
I think this would be betterOh okay my bad ^^ll
UnderstoodI think this would be better
So....if a person could manipulate how something functions (For example Relativity or Yin and Yang)...would it be considered as manipulating a concept or manipulating a law?
It is probably manipulating more concepts if yang, yin, and relativity are more accurate to their respective definitions.So....if a person could manipulate how something functions (For example Relativity or Yin and Yang)...would it be considered as manipulating a concept or manipulating a law?
Understood.It is probably manipulating more concepts if yang, yin, and relativity are more accurate to their respective definitions.
Not really. Only the literal Taiji or Wuji can lead to 1A and above as far as I know..If yin and yang here is literally yin and yang, that could be conceptual manipulation and can lead to 1-A ratings, potentially
Pretty sure yin and yang represent all conceptual dualities and being above them implies being beyond all conceptsNot really. Only the literal Taiji or Wuji can lead to 1A and above as far as I know..
If that includes plato's concept as well. Sure I guess you could say that.Pretty sure yin and yang represent all conceptual dualities and being above them implies being beyond all concepts
If its the literal yin and yang of course
Don't need to, I think even on this wiki you dont need to transcend platos concepts, you just need to transcend all concepts, which includes dimensionsIf that includes plato's concept as well. Sure I guess you could say that.