It’s not ridiculous to say the context is similar. Both are huge amps with feats much higher than the last. Plain and simple.
Yeah, sure, comparing amps that have nothing to do with each other and for one that we can guess actual numbers for is totally a similar context. It's not like Roshi's isn't a transformation, or the difference in power between his base and Max Power isn't as ridiculous as Base Goku and SSG, or like
we hadn't seen it in action before pulling off a completely different feat, absurdly lower feat.
Again it’s not mind boggling. You’re over blowing it. Also the shockwaves were 3-B, matching Beerus isn’t a destructive feat it’s power scaling, and Goku’s only feat that was 3-A was punching out the dense energy ball that had enough power to wipe out the universe.
You are focusing on completely irrelevant things. The amount of context you blow over to call them "comparable" is ridiculous to say the least. And no, Goku has
two feats, actually read AKM's blog. Contributing to the energy ball, and then overpowering Beerus' power null that could nullify the entirety of the energy ball. And I am not sure how having both a destructive feat and scaling to someone that contributed to that feat changes anything... rather, you are just cementing that Goku's reasoning is way better, so the situation is again comparable at only surface level.
I never said he was holding back at all. I said he destroyed it by accident. Also AOE, DB characters know how to attack objects and people without destroying the planet.
So he failed to not destroy the mountain and screwed that up but totally didn't fail in only destroying the mountain, what he didn't try to do. Makes total sense.
I have zero idea what Frieza, Cell or Buu have to do with this. You actually think King Piccolo would end up killing him self if he destroyed the planet with his own power? That’s some “core level Frieza” levels of illogical. King Piccolo can fly up and destroy the planet like every other DB character ever and I’m pretty sure Namekians can breathe in space. Again with Piccolo Jr, area of effect.
... Did you suddenly forget King Piccolo can't survive in space? Like Piccolo? Like Namekians? Unlike those 3 I mentioned? You are free to show me literally any indication that namekians can survive in space. The only one that seriously tried to blow up earth even if he wouldn't survive that is Vegeta, and he has a raging temper that was pushed to its limits at that moment. I see no temper on Piccolo.
So basically, people having smaller feats doesn't matter anymore because "AoE can be controlled and we should totally believe King Piccolo".
Moot. King Piccolo destroying earth is a supporting statement, not a crutch.
A supporting that has absolutely nothing backing it beyond saying "yeah Ki control totally patches any holes due to inconsistent feats."
This outlier ting just hinges on “muh one feat, muh inconsistent, muh anti feats”, etc. It’s super easy to say the moon bust is legit but the wiki has to use a bunch of twists and turns and mental gymnastics to say “nah B, outliner B.” Not only is this argument outdated (2014 for **** sake) but it’s stone walling and an Appeal to Association Fallacy.
This is the genuinely dumbest thing you have said by fair. So anti-feats and inconsistency aren't a thing anymore, and we can completely disregard them, even when they outnumber and are more consistent than the actual supposed feat.
**** it, I said what I had to say. If this is the kind of dumb logic we rely on, I am gonna need to start doing some CRTs, inconsistency and anti-feats are now worth shit.