Apeironaxim
He/Him- 3,618
- 1,400
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Spoiler |
---|
Like this |
Spoiler |
---|
One of the illustrations looks like we might get a destructive feat for Albedo's WCI |
The definition is more associated with supernatural powers than the other definitions that are: old hag, alluring/charming woman, evil woman. Hilma fits two of those, is she the reason for the volume name? Again, like I said you're using things to try to justify your spoiler, even though people can have varying theories. And I have already given another theory.XBlake123 said:" Last time I checked Renner is no witch" like I figured, you misinterpreted and tried to blow it with baseless assumptions. I wasn't talking abut her being a "witch" in a literal sense but as an evil woman which was revealed years ago about her nature and lastly the " Ruined Country" as I explained already in my previous comment.
In your rush to reply you should have noticed why I said that;XBlake123 said:I never even said or implied "'x' character is the reason for 'x' volume", nice strawmanning.
So the title "Witch of the Ruined Country" was really for Renner. | ||
~ XBlake123 |
You've already stated she is the reason the for the volume's title. I don't think I've said 'oh no so she turned into a witch' since beyond the title being spoiled, I was looking forward to reading it for more context. Is that another spoiler?XBlake123 said:Comprehension is a thing, jumping out of conclusion "oh no so she turned into a witch" when no such thing even happened just shows how you were looking to create a baseless drama instead of directly stating your issue in first place but nah "people who's in the know will know". Good thing you understood your fault and dropped the topic.
Not according to google, as the 'informal' definition is that of an evil women and other such stuff while primary one is the one related to supernatural. In fact most sites give this as the primary; A woman thought to have magic powers, especially evil ones.XBlake123 said:"The definition is more associated with supernatural powers". That's your headcanon, not the premise of the Overlord.
If you mean me, no. That is a quote of your post.XBlake123 said:So now you are assuming "Renner" is the reason for V14? Like I said earlier, nice strawmanning.
That was a genuine question as you've put forth something new on the table I didn't say.XBlake123 said:"Is that another spoiler" No. It isn't. But could be according to your assumption?
What is this? It is fine to say you're wrong as you've stated that the definition of a witch is more related to the supernatural is my 'headcanon', followed by me giving evidence as to why it is not and now you're steering clear of that blunder. Also using google is relevant here, as my entire argument was based off 'witch' being supernatural. Are you feeling well?XBlake123 said:"Not according to google"
Except no one here is talking about google definitions, we're talking about Overlord. Renner being a "witch" to her country was revealed way before V14 due to her evil nature, helping Nazarick, etc. Hell, I can even quote the novel chapter where once she was literally referred as a "witch". You assuming her being a "literal witch" and then trying to back it up with google is irrelevant to premise of entire argument.
Since you're saying 'comprehension is a thing' you should be well aware of the topic at hand, that being the title. In fact that first post I explained the 'x' character thing, I heavily implied the issue was the title, even giving my theory of why it should have been Evileye.XBlake123 said:"If you mean me, no. That is a quote of your post"
My quote was to the title, not the entire novel itself. Comprehension is a thing.
You did put something new on the table by stating "oh no so she turned into a witch". When did I say that?XBlake123 said:No, I didn't put anything new on table. Everything I said was in regards to your previous baseless drama.
So in conclusion, I gave no spoiler, your headcanon along with poor comprehension turned your arguments in a mess, you realized it and tried to shift on "google definitions" thinking it will help you, I gave proper context to what I said to prove it indeed wasn't a spoiler.
Tldr; you should read, then comprehend it and then finally actually write.
Hardly anything resists or merits him using such power, so only one time, unless you count the side story where he is warped to the New World, alone, and way before the time he is sent to in the main series.WolfGuyakira said:Did Ainz use Goal of all life is Death only one time so far? It is a pretty powerful spell so I was wondering if he never used it again after fight with Shalltear
Alright. But can I reply to his second last comment? He did that after five minutes of yours and tried to play a safe card by replying to your after doing that comment.LSirLancelotDuLacl said:How about you both cut this shit out?
Also, Blake, I don't care how much you think things are obvious due to build up, put a lid on it and don't discuss without proper spoiler tags.
Am asking nicely.
Oh I see thank youLSirLancelotDuLacl said:Hardly anything resists or merits him using such power, so only one time, unless you count the side story where he is warped to the New World, alone, and way before the time he is sent to in the main series.WolfGuyakira said:Did Ainz use Goal of all life is Death only one time so far? It is a pretty powerful spell so I was wondering if he never used it again after fight with Shalltear
Also, again, drop it please.