• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Johnny Joestar and Gyro Addition

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
31,701
Reaction score
5,478
Act 4 and Ball Breaker should both have the same resistances, as their power comes from the same thing, the infinite rotation. With that in mind, they should also resist Funny Valentine's BFR and Probability Manipulation with Love Train as they bypassed his redirection.

Gyro also had more or less the same power, and it wasn't even weaker then Johnny in terms of Dimension traveling. It was just that Gyro's steel ball was malformed. Both of them use gravity to achieve this effect.

Both should get Resistance Negation since they force the target to obey the laws of physics.
 
Iapitus The Impaler said:
Also, if they don't have it already, they should get soul manip since they can attack even the target's soul
Where does Gyro show this?
 
Can you guys prove that better? I'm skeptical, last time I checked this was a power ACT4 had only. How's it also part of the Infinite Rotation?
 
"Can you prove that (insert) isn't ACT 4 only?" - E

"Are you referring to (insert)?" -Y

"I'll wait for evidence." -E

seems to be a misunderstanding
 
After reading that again, yeah I agree. I thought the "It's just a product of the Infinite Rotation" was as in "it just is" and not "it's stated to be so".
 
I suppose that this seems fairly uncontroversial to add.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top