- 24,183
- 3,938
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Sonic VS Lavos
- Thread starter ZacharyGrossman273
- Start date
- 28,213
- 1,742
Sweet Jeez, Rick...
- 40,470
- 12,953
I still think this is a fair match but absorption + bfr to nonexistence + some of the best acausality on this website = screwed Sonic.
- 12,524
- 3,492
Pretty sure Sonic can get out of nonexistence BFR with At least Multiversal+ range. The BFR to 2D sounds like it's more effective.
Though I need a run-down over what Lavos's best abilities are before I can make a decision.
Though I need a run-down over what Lavos's best abilities are before I can make a decision.
ShakeResounding
He/Him- 8,789
- 7,722
I agree with needing more info. Lavos is kinda just a figure I know is really formidable, but I haven't looked into any thread with him. I'll hold my vote for now.
- 10,971
- 4,941
what about sonic passive fate hax?
- 10,971
- 4,941
Lavos does not have type 4 so his acausality won`t neg itMYHERO said:
- 10,971
- 4,941
also zach you linked lavos to sonic and sonic to lavos can ou please fix that
- 12,524
- 3,492
After looking through Lavos's profile, you can call me crazy, but I think Sonic can take it.
Lavos's absorption is a big deal, Sonic though can counter it with his own passive holy manipulation to nullify Lavos and his type 8 allows him to retain his life force.
The existence + non existence erasure, this is basically similar to conceptual manipulation, which Sonic resists as he was unaffected when tanking the Super Genesis Wave, also helps that Enerjak outright said he couldn't destroy Super Sonic.
As for how Sonic can win here? He has experience with type 3 acausality and going by previous threads, Lavos is vulnerable to conceptual manipulation. Sonic also uses Chaos Control more often later in the comics, so what he could do is repeat like he did in Worlds Collide and go outside of the multiverse to nuke it of any Lavos clones (IDK if Time Devourer still has the clone business or not like the earlier keys), thus taking care of Lavos for good and he'd have no Eggman to mess him up.
Lavos's absorption is a big deal, Sonic though can counter it with his own passive holy manipulation to nullify Lavos and his type 8 allows him to retain his life force.
The existence + non existence erasure, this is basically similar to conceptual manipulation, which Sonic resists as he was unaffected when tanking the Super Genesis Wave, also helps that Enerjak outright said he couldn't destroy Super Sonic.
As for how Sonic can win here? He has experience with type 3 acausality and going by previous threads, Lavos is vulnerable to conceptual manipulation. Sonic also uses Chaos Control more often later in the comics, so what he could do is repeat like he did in Worlds Collide and go outside of the multiverse to nuke it of any Lavos clones (IDK if Time Devourer still has the clone business or not like the earlier keys), thus taking care of Lavos for good and he'd have no Eggman to mess him up.
- 10,971
- 4,941
Lavos is not vulnerable to concept stuff he just does not have resistance to it
- 12,524
- 3,492
He has no resistance so yeah, it'll work.
- 12,524
- 3,492
Cal is already here.
- 40,470
- 12,953
One minute. Forcing Fate to come.
- 40,470
- 12,953
Holy manipulation is completely useless here, btw. Lavos absorbs holy attacks passively. If anything, it makes him stronger.
Same with fate manipulation. Literally the entire plot of Chrono Cross would make that child's play here.
Same with fate manipulation. Literally the entire plot of Chrono Cross would make that child's play here.
- 12,524
- 3,492
What do holy attacks in Chrono Trigger do? Is it similar to Sonic's.
- 40,470
- 12,953
Doesn't really matter. They're holy based, that's all that matters. It doesn't matter the hax behind it if the source of the power gets negated. The primary effect being shut down stops the secondary effect.
- 24,183
- 3,938
- Thread starter
- #22
Holy manipulation is one of those dumb powers that can mean a fuckton of things
- 40,470
- 12,953
Also, Solaris's acausality is actual sh*t compared to base Lavos's, let alone Time Devourer.
- 24,183
- 3,938
- Thread starter
- #24
Both are type 3s to be fair
But we have like, four type 3s on the whole site
But we have like, four type 3s on the whole site
- 10,971
- 4,941
high level smt demons have itZacharyGrossman273 said:
- 40,470
- 12,953
There's also that Sonic's immortality doesn't come into play when it Lavos kills him naturally, he'll be denied the right to have ever existed, and this works on acausals.
- 12,524
- 3,492
The Super Genesis Wave does the same thing and Sonic tanked it.The real cal howard said:
- 40,470
- 12,953
SGW is vastly different. I know what the SGW does.
- 12,524
- 3,492
That doesn't sound too different. SGW can rewrite the multiverse on a conceptual level and can erase beings to make it as if they never existed at all.
- 40,470
- 12,953
Denied the right to have ever existed isn't the same as erasing from existence.
- 24,183
- 3,938
- Thread starter
- #33
That sounds like erasing someone from the present and past at once, like monika
- 12,524
- 3,492
That's Mid-Godly negging, which is what conceptual erasure does.
- 40,470
- 12,953
Sonic also needs to actively nuke an infinite multiverse to counter Lavos, which I doubt he would do if he ever could even figure it out.
I also forgot that Lavos can get rid of resistances, so Sonic's resistances fall short too. Granted, that requires an attack. It's not passive.
I also forgot that Lavos can get rid of resistances, so Sonic's resistances fall short too. Granted, that requires an attack. It's not passive.
- 40,470
- 12,953
Why is speed equal? Why are the names reversed?
- 24,183
- 3,938
- Thread starter
- #37
The names are reversed to mess with people
- 40,470
- 12,953
But...why?
- 12,524
- 3,492
Sonic has dealt with type 3 acausality before, so I don't think he'd be clueless in figuring out about Lavos's nature.
Yeah equalizing is redundant when both are immeasurable, plus I noticed the links being reversed as well.
Yeah equalizing is redundant when both are immeasurable, plus I noticed the links being reversed as well.
Similar threads
